• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Surrey’s cancelled referendum: good for Surrey, no change for everyone else

0
  • by Editor
  • in Funding · Resources
  • — 9 Feb, 2017

Surrey CC council chamber. Photo: Surrey CC, Flickr.

Surrey County Council has cancelled its referendum on a 15% hike in council tax aimed at paying for social care. The reason will see Surrey benefit but will leave other authorities asking how their funding issues will be solved.

It’s off. The referendum that would have seen the residents of Surrey vote on a 15% hike in council tax will not go ahead.

Announced in January, every local government officer up and down the country had been watching what would happen when council tax payers were asked to back a hefty rise in taxes for a council beset by social care funding issues. But after a tense meeting of Surrey County Council on Tuesday evening this week the referendum will now not happen.

The circumstances prompted an angry response from Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn who demanded to know which “sweeteners” had been offered to Surrey’s Tory-led council. Text messages had allegedly gone astray, handing the Labour leader a rare opportunity to seize the initiative at PMQs.

Questions about why the referendum was killed were understandable. Reports said that Surrey’s council leader, David Hodge, withdrew his referendum proposal after delaying the council meeting for three hours while “negotiating” on the phone with Whitehall.

Hodge has also been quoted in the Financial Times saying “The government has listened and we believe the government now understands,” and that by next year the finance position would be quite different. The implication was that something big was on its way, enough to make the council leader change his mind. However, he remained tight lipped about what it was.

David Hodge. Photo: Surrey CC, Flickr

Later we received some further insight. The suggestion from a think tank, the Local Government Information Unit (LGiU), on the BBC’s Today programme, was that Surrey will be included in business rates devolution trials due to kick off in April, well ahead of the 2020 start date for a nation wide launch.

That’s a boon for Surrey. The county council, pained by a £170m drop in grant money since 2010, will now opt for a 4.99% rise in council tax — a figure much below its referendum target — safe in the knowledge that cash is coming early from rates devolution.

It’s debatable whether Surrey’s leaders ever really expected its residents to back a 15% rise in council tax. Many interpreted the move as an effort to focus central government’s attention on social care funding. Others read referendums as a way of preparing the ground for councils to rebel against balanced budgets, an act that would force central government into action.

But opinion was split over who stood to gain or lose. Some saw central government benefiting: a win would work out well, tax payers would be taking responsibility; a loss would indicate a lack of appetite for increased spending and current government policy would be in the clear.

In the end the government emerges from the episode without  a winner’s rosette. The last minute efforts appear to indicate a desperate effort to avoid a referendum. Many believe this is because Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, has his constituency in Surrey and could not risk having the referendum turn into a vote on his efforts to make the health service work in tandem with social care.

A slide from the Surrey CC press office. Photo: Surrey CC, Flickr

What we do know is that Surrey’s action has worked — for Surrey. The brinkmanship involved has won the county an important funding reprieve.

But dodging the referendum will provide little comfort to other local authorities up and down the country battling to pay for social care now. It will also provide little reassurance to those authorities who do not expect business rates devolution to be their saviour come 2020, and are still unclear how the new system will work.

As the LGiU said in a blog at the end of last month: “Although in principle this new system could offer a greater degree of fiscal freedom, areas with a low business rate intake are justifiably concerned about how the redistribution element will work after the Revenue Support Grant is fully phased out.”

The referendum didn’t just stand for Surrey’s finances. It symbolised local government finances as a whole. But Surrey’s settlement stands for a short-term fix. Local government finance officers across Britain will continue to wonder how the social care question will be resolved for them, if the government genuinely now understands the position local authorities are in. .

Get the Room151 Newsletter

 

Share

You may also like...

  • What’s the benefit of using the PSAA? 17th Aug, 2021
  • How to be net zero by 2030 23rd Feb, 2022
  • Finance chiefs may have to ’embrace the uncertainty’ in financial planning 11th Jun, 2021
  • Warrington’s credit rating downgraded by Moody’s 3rd May, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 2 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 3 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 4 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 4 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story News round-up: Surrey denies ‘sweetheart deal’, outsourcing spike, IR35 ’emergency’, Islington says postpone rates revaluation
  • Next story Government calls for LGPS investment in new homes

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares