• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

The trouble with big numbers

0
  • by Guest
  • in Funding
  • — 13 Aug, 2014

Lambeth council has to save £115m over four years.  Tackling fraud and “flogging” assets won’t fill the gap alone, says Guy Ware, Lambeth’s s151 officer. 

This year, Lambeth Council is saving £25m to  balance a budget of £315m. Next year it will be  £37m, then £26m, then another £27m. That’s  £115m over four years. On top of the £79m we’ve cut in the last three years.
The only shocking thing about these numbers  is that they’re no longer shocking. We’re not alone. Anyone in local government who’s been paying attention will have seen or managed or been given sleepless nights by numbers just like these. The LGA’s Future Funding Outlook 2014 says the funding gap for local councils is set to rise by £2.1bn a year, to £12.4bn by the end of the decade.
These are big numbers. And the trouble with big numbers is that many people – possibly most –  have trouble grasping what they mean. So they focus on the little ones instead.
On the day the LGA report was published, Eric  Pickles told CIPFA’s conference that the answer  is “simple”: “Don’t spend what you haven’t got.  Don’t waste the taxes you don’t need to have.”  But councils, unlike the government, don’t have the luxury of spending what we haven’t got (it’s against the law) and delegates were struck by the mis-match between the scale of our task and the remedies offered: tackling fraud and flogging “idle” assets.
There’s nothing wrong with either, of course.  Lambeth is good at detecting and preventing  fraud – and at prosecuting those who commit  it. In the last year we’ve saved ourselves and others £3m that way. We’re proud of that. But it’s not a solution – simple or otherwise – to our budget problem.
We’re also pretty good at squeezing value out  of our assets – increasing their productivity, or selling them off. Over the last four years, we’ve realised over £100m, and reinvested the cash in new homes and schools and better roads –  and in transforming our services. We haven’t used it to fill gaps in our revenue budget, which would be short-sighted (and illegal). Like many councils, we’re also reducing our offices, from 14 buildings to two, freeing up space, capital and development potential for affordable housing  and business premises in the heart of Brixton,  while cutting our revenue costs by £4.5m a year. And yet, and yet…We still have another £115m to find.
In response to questions, Pickles told us to put away the begging bowl. Localised business  rates gave us greater financial flexibility, he said.  Well, yes and no. Simply changing the name of a pound from ‘Revenue Support Grant’ to  ‘retained business rate’ doesn’t let us spend it  more than once.
We welcome the chance to keep some of the benefits of growth in our local economy, of course. For Lambeth, we reckon our share might be about £1m. So we’ve added that into our budget. (The one with the £115m hole.) Pickles said he wants to increase the proportion of rates  we keep, an ambition he repeated to the LGA  conference a week later. Which means we might  get to keep another £1m. Better than a poke  in the eye with a blunt stick, but… still another  £114m to go. Which doesn’t feel all that flexible.
So what else are we doing? Well, a lot of stuff everybody else is doing, of course, because, as I  say, we’re not alone. And some important things that many aren’t. Being a co-operative council for us means fundamentally re-shaping the  relationship and the balance of power between the council and our citizens. Because it’s right;  and because we can’t afford the one we’ve got.  Together with our citizens, we’re focusing on what we all want to happen, not the services the  council runs. We’re shifting the money  we do have, and the resources our citizens can bring, to invest in building resilient communities and reducing the demand for traditional public services.
We’re experimenting – using randomised control trials to find out how to change the way  people behave – whether it’s paying Council  Tax, recycling waste or looking after their family and neighbours. We’re in a partnership that’s won £38m from the Big Lottery to research and make fundamental changes in the early years of  children’s lives over the next ten years. Changes we’ll be able to prove deliver huge benefits – and big number savings – in the future.
Some of this is familiar, some of it genuinely new. It’s exciting, and challenging, and hard.  None of it, whatever the secretary of state might think, is simple. But it’s what keeps us going.

Photo (cropped) by Dustin Liebenow

Share

You may also like...

  • Bradford councillor fears £33.8m children’s services overspend could lead to s114 20th Jul, 2022
  • To Michael Gove: a modest proposal 11th May, 2022
  • Impact Awards: Cheltenham’s tech hub and Hackney’s recovery from cyber attack 14th Apr, 2021
  • Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment 19th May, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 9 hours ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 12 hours ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 2 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 2 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 3 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 1 week ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Bonds with impact
  • Next story Q&A with Barry Hunter

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares