• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Graham Liddell: It’s budget season – time for internal audit to add value

0
  • by Graham Liddell
  • in Graham Liddell · Technical
  • — 9 Nov, 2016

Budget setting is underway and what better time for internal audit to show it can add value and do a better job than artificial intelligence.

Graham Liddell

Graham Liddell

Finance teams are now fully immersed in budget setting for 2017–18. Most councils have a well-established annual processes, but cracks may be starting to show as budgetary pressures mount.

The next few months are probably not the right time to start inserting the audit nose and carrying out detailed testing, but it is a good time to start thinking about our approach.

We know that we are good at auditing the nuts and bolts of the process. But in today’s climate, this is not good enough. Internal audit teams are under threat, in the short term from contributing to back-office savings and in the longer term from our work being carried out by artificial intelligence. We need to demonstrate that we can add real value and what better place to start than the audit of the annual budget cycle.

In pursuit of complexity

We are at our most potent when we deliver complex and sometimes contradictory objectives:

  • providing objective assurance together with subjective insights and advice
  • commenting on governance arrangements whilst getting right into the detail of how a system works in practice
  • assessing compliance with controls and the impact of control failures.

To deliver this complexity we will need creativity and imagination to determine how we obtain audit evidence and then use our critical thinking skills to interpret the results.

Data analysis

If there is one area that is crying out for using data imaginatively it is the audit of budgetary control. There is a wealth of information that can be used at various stages of the audit. Your chief finance officer will have some great ideas and, working with a data analyst, it shouldn’t be too tricky to develop a suite of information. This could include:

For targeting audit work

  • services that regularly over or underspend
  • services that have processed a large number of virements

For assessing whether controls are operating as intended

  • number of budget holders who have not completed training in the last two years
  • frequency that budget holders interrogate the financial management system to update budget outturn projections

For assessing effectiveness

  • how the predicted outturn varies during the course of the year
  • the extent of reliance on one-off windfalls and use of year-end adjustments/reserves
  • how have these patterns changed over recent years?

The testing programme

The budget process involves the whole council from members to front-line service providers and so we have a lot of ground to cover. The good news is that we will probably have pretty good documentation of the system from previous years. The bad news is that we are unlikely to add much by simply re-performing last year’s testing programme.

The challenge, then, is to step back from previous years and design a creative and manageable programme of tests that will tell us something new and valuable. The best audit programmes use a variety of sources of evidence:

  • data analysis, ideally to gain evidence about the whole population
  • detailed sample tests to gain a deeper insight into specific areas
  • talking to people to find out what works and what doesn’t

The programme will be informed by any data analysis we have carried out at the planning stage, the views of key stakeholders, including budget holders and the chief finance officer. To this mix, we can add the wealth of cumulative audit knowledge and experience gained from other audit work. This might include concerns about the control environment in particular services or control weaknesses for specific systems types of income or expenditure (payroll, contract management etc).

Audit insights and advice

During the course of the audit review we will, no doubt, have heard a range of strongly held views on what is wrong with the budget process and how it can be fixed. What distinguishes audit from these views is that our insights and advice are driven by evidence and application of some serious thinking. This comes towards the end of the audit and there are some important traps to avoid, particularly when time is tight.

  • The first danger is that we miss out the serious thinking stage by jumping to prescriptive recommendations. In some cases, it may be appropriate to be prescriptive (if the control to ensure that the budget has been completely and accurately loaded onto the general ledger has lapsed, we would recommend that it should be reinstated). More often than not, however, prescriptive recommendations don’t address the underlying issue and irritate client managers.
  • Just as bad, however, is to provide the analysis setting out the risks to the council without providing any meaningful way forward. If we can’t work with managers to develop practical audit recommendations, what value do we really add?

And finally…

There are, of course, many different ways to review the annual budget process. But what we can’t do is the same audit year after year. We need to take the opportunity to showcase our work and demonstrate our worth to the organisation. This means thinking creatively, applying professional judgement and working with managers to develop practical solutions. If we don’t, we might not get another chance.

Graham Liddell is head of Internal Audit at Brighton & Hove City Council.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • IFRS 16: A lot of effort, but a great opportunity too 25th Jan, 2022
  • ‘We need to shift the focus of local authority accounting’ 20th Apr, 2022
  • Crisis in local audit unlikely to be solved by coming reforms 1st Sep, 2021
  • Council auditors are in ‘shackles’ and need to be released 3rd Aug, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 1 day ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story James Bevan: Inflation and demographics
  • Next story GMCA treasurer defends use of LOBO loans

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares