• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: Support deficit

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in Richard Harbord
  • — 4 Feb, 2015

It is interesting to look back at the last five years of this Parliament in the context of being a local authority. Arguably local authorities have not been in such a difficult and dark place since before the 1835 reforms.

The question is deciding whether or not authorities have been well served by those in the DCLG, or whether opportunities have been missed to make things better.

The parliament is characterised by the need to make economies with the lion’s share of those savings falling on local authorities. That has been a well discussed result of making the priorities for protection education (to some extent), the National Health Service and overseas aid.

The difficulty is that these priorities do not seem to be set for change going forward. This is a real problem because the future of the health service needs great vision and leadership. Sadly there is a danger that it will swallow all our resources and still fail to give the service that is needed. The increased demand for children and adult services has added to the protection for health services because they too are the responsibility of the health department.

There is no doubt that the DCLG is no longer at the centre of government. Its services are plainly not those accorded the highest priority, or indeed any priority at all. Managers in local government feel they are not supported as well as they might be by the Secretary of State and his team. Events like DCLG being the first department to agree savings requested by the Treasury did not send the correct message about the value of local services.

There have been two major landmarks. However the benefits of both to local authorities has been rendered less effective by timing and the condition of the economy.

The Localism Act 2011 was billed as passing new freedoms and powers to town halls. The most significant element was the inclusion of a general power of competence, but this came in just as resources disappeared. The Act also contained rate discounts and additional powers for communities to influence council policy, and there are good examples of this in action.

The other major change was change to the way authorities were financed from the revenue support grant to retention of business rates. It wasn’t quite what local authorities had in mind when they campaigned for the return of control of business rates from central government. True the level of discontent on the grant system was consistently high but the retention scheme lacks any certainty. Long-term forecasting is difficult and again it is a system implemented at the most difficult time to ensure success.

DCLG has consistently encouraged shared services along with shared management teams and transformation grants have been offered to support these sorts of reforms. What has happened needs a thorough study because savings generated by these initiatives have been variable and the success patchy.

One major omission by DCLG has been the failure to offer any guidance on the structure of local government. Many districts find it difficult to provide comprehensive services and there are gaps among first tier authorities in meeting care and education needs. Whoever is elected in May needs to have a coherent strategy for the future. It may be combined authorities, but here to the stresses and strains of these sorts of arrangements are easily overlooked.

Interestingly the secretary of state has been willing to involve himself in detailed areas. The one concession on re-organisation has been to make it easier to set up town and parish councils. Many doubt this is a great or affordable priority. There have also been a number of detailed personal letters to chief executives urging less bureaucracy around street parties. There has also been a huge and enduring obsession around refuse collection where generally the public is happy with the service provided (I read somewhere recently that only one authority had actually received the relevant grant offered).

So in conclusion, there have been a number of good things. But it all has to be looked at against the national backcloth. Local authorities have undoubtedly felt a lack of support and leadership in maintaining the vital services they provide.

Share

You may also like...

  • Richard Harbord: ‘Effective governance’ the key to commercial activity 17th Aug, 2021
  • Budget 2021: A missed opportunity while bidding could prove a strain 5th Mar, 2021
  • Richard Harbord: What will happen with business rates? 30th Nov, 2021
  • Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing 7th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 21 hours ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 21 hours ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 7 days ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Guy Ware: So what’s a co-op council?
  • Next story S&P downgrades UK banks

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK