• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: Urgent – solve the local government question

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in Richard Harbord
  • — 27 May, 2015

richard_harbord 520There are a number of important issues in need of resolution at the start of this Parliament but unless the future of local government receives some time and discussion I fear for the worst. The time has come for leadership from central government on the funding and purpose of local authorities. Above all else, there is a need for some clarity about future structures.

One of the major difficulties of the last five years has been the lack of influence and authority of DCLG. Indeed, there was some speculation that DCLG would disappear in a shake up of government departments. But it is crucial that DCLG now takes back the initiative from the Treasury to ensure that devolution is properly and fairly implemented.

The devolution question is given added importance by the funding question. The former chairman of the Local Government Association, councillor David Sparks, has been quoted saying that some local authorities will go bankrupt in the next five years unless the financing of local government is reformed.

Morning after
Ever since the morning after the Scottish devolution referendum local authorities seemed to think that the Prime Minister’s remarks about devolution to England meant an increase in devolution to local authorities.

The chancellor conceived the Northern Powerhouse project to “gather the north’s cities into an economic formation that could rival London and combined can take on the world”.

Manchester was the natural place to start. The authorities forming Greater Manchester have long worked together and have a solid record of achievement. Of any area this is the one most likely to be successful.  It is a major project including policing, skills, housing and control of a £6bn health budget.

But it will have implications for everyone else.

In October 2013 The Economist suggested that instead of subsidising cities such as Hull, Huddersfield and Wolverhampton they should be allowed to decline. This has not been the story of the launch of the Northern Powerhouse Project but many think that it is an inevitable conclusion. As always in major change there will be those who will benefit from devolution. But it could well widen the gap between those who are capable of joining in and those who can’t.

The problems for the future of local government will be crystallised in the July budget.

The NHS questions
Devolution also raises questions for the NHS (actually, the devolution project will see the end of the National Health Service and the creation of a number of smaller regionalised hubs).

The Budget will have to deal with the current need for finance in order to keep the NHS going. The commitment is £8bn but already there are those that believe that anything up to £30bn is needed to achieve all that is needed.  There is a danger that the £8bn currently on offer will just disappear to meet current deficits and difficulties whereas what is really needed is a change in the way the NHS works.

However, given we remain in an age of austerity, the more that goes to the NHS the less there is for other public services.

The Budget also has to deal with £12-13bn welfare savings. However these are made (and as I write this there seems to be a sharp divergence of opinion in the Cabinet over how it should be achieved) it will have an effect on local authorities. The demand for emergency payments and discretionary housing payments has grown considerably and will continue to do so.

Structures
It is clear then that continuing austerity is one of the driving forces in the fight for devolved funds. This last week has seen, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Northampton combine in an effort to be in place for devolved funds whilst Lincolnshire, in a rather different move, announced that the way forward was a County Unitary.

In this drive to larger and larger devolved authorities it would seem that the concept of localism may be declared moribund.

Talk from the Treasury was that devolved authorities would keep a larger share of their business rates. This was already promised by Eric Pickles. There is a finite amount of resource available and increasing the proportion retained by one authority will inevitably cause a correction elsewhere.

The government must seize the devolution project and lead it, preferably by DCLG rather than the Treasury. They need to decide, at the very least, on the outlines of a future structure for local government, while the devolution project must give some thought to all authorities. There needs to be decisions about fundamental reforms in the health budget and an increase in the working together of health and local government as well as other agencies.

The one topic that everyone managed to avoid in the election campaign was the funding of care for the elderly. There needs to be a properly costed strategy to deal with this too.

The Guardian has suggested that not everyone in the north may be happy to acknowledge Manchester as the northern capital and we may hear more of this in due course.

When the cabinet discusses welfare reform perhaps they could remove housing costs from Universal Credit and leave them where they are best dealt with in local authorities.

Richard Harbord is a consultant and former chief executive of Boston Borough Council.

 

Share

You may also like...

  • Skills in short supply for local government audit 12th Oct, 2021
  • Budget 2021: A missed opportunity while bidding could prove a strain 5th Mar, 2021
  • Richard Harbord Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point 11th Jan, 2021
  • Richard Harbord: What will happen with business rates? 30th Nov, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 17 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 17 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 7 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story James Bevan: The coming infrastructure finance boom
  • Next story Queen’s Speech: Accelerate business rate appeals

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares