• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Innes Edwards on beating benchmarks and treasury centres of excellence

1
  • by Editor
  • in Interviews
  • — 31 Oct, 2012

Innes Edwards is Treasury Manager of The City of Edinburgh Council. His responsibilities cover both treasury (including leasing and investment of Lothian Pension Fund cash) and banking.

Room151: How did your approach to cash management achieve its benchmark-beating gains during the credit crisis?

Innes Edwards: If you have a look at Performance Graph 1 which shows what our net performance was before and during the credit crunch against benchmark and money market funds at the time.  Our in-house fund (CEC Cash Fund) gained in the region of £5.5m relative to the benchmark and that was achieved in a number of ways.

Firstly, we went out longer with some banks like HSBC right at the top of the crunch. As we saw things were getting bad we went out to a year and as rates came down, significantly and very rapidly, we made a large gain through that lengthening of the weighted average maturity.

The other thing we’ve done is use innovative instruments. We used treasury bills (T-bills) for a while when there was a decent return on those relative to, say, the DMO. We used government guaranteed bonds which offer a high level of security and put very little of your capital at risk but were gaining a much greater level of interest than a similar direct government investment. We used floating rate notes (FRNs) as well.

One of the advantages of doing things in-house is the ability to know your cash flows in detail. We’re able to make a better estimate about what’s going to be there for a while, both for ourselves and the pension fund, and so take on greater, longer-term volatility in the weighted average maturity of our fund which is why we went out longer with HSBC and a couple of Irish banks, once the government had stepped in with a government guarantee, and how we got a better investment rate at those times.

Room151: So were you taking liquidity risk that other authorities would have been uncomfortable with had a money market fund been taking the same risk on their behalf?

IE: Well, we were taking liquidity risk basically because we had a better in-house understanding of our cash flows than a money market fund would be allowed to have. We could take a reasonable view on a one year basis of what we thought our core cash would be and altered our maturity to take advantage of that, taking liquidity risk as interest rates fell.

Room151: What have you been doing more recently to generate additional returns?

IE: We entered into strong negotiations with a number of UK and oversees banks regarding both interest rates and terms with our intentions to achieve a premium rate for the cash invested. We were getting substantially above base on call accounts although some of those banks have recently served notice that their rates are coming down.

More importantly, we took government guaranteed FRNs way back in August 2011 just as Libor was starting to be squeezed upwards because of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. By buying FRNs which are set every quarter we made significant gains but retained a high level of security because the nominal and interest were guaranteed. So by using FRNs, which a lot of authorities probably wouldn’t look at, we’ve been able to leverage up some of the performance.

Room151: Does running a treasury unit like this boil down to size?

IE: I think there are two things to it. Firstly, we’ve got a good team here who’ve got the knowledge and been through various qualifications. Secondly, we’ve got the arrangement with the pension fund, the Police Board, the Fire Board and the Transport Authority and we manage their cash in one whole fund. By putting it all together we have anywhere between £250m and, at times, over £500m in funds under management. That allows us to be more innovative. Thanks to the close relationship with the pension fund we were able to piggy-back on their custody accounts and have access to multiple brokers as opposed to an arrangement where you’re stuck with a single nominee.  We mostly buy on a ‘hold to-maturity’ basis but having access to different brokers means we can look around for the best offers in the market.

Room151: Is your model scalable or does requiring a thorough understanding of cash flow limit you to the organisations you’re currently managing cash for?

IE: I think it is scalable to an extent. If you look at our portfolio we tend to have quite a high allocation in the inter-authority market. If you wanted to be a fund of several billion pounds then you couldn’t maintain the same percentage allocation of cash with other locals as the capacity isn’t there.

The other issue is the shared service agenda and the regulatory position which has never really been resolved. We manage cash for a number of different organisations but they’re all linked in one way or another. The arrangement is almost like a private company doing it for joint subsidiaries. So you can interpret the perimeter guidance within the FSA’s Conduct of Business Sourcebook reasonably in a local authority context there.  If you want to manage cash for another local authority then deposits with a bank might be fine but if we wanted to buy T-bills, for example, that would need to come under investment authorisation and I don’t think we would particularly want to go down the route of being regulated by the FSA or whoever’s going to succeed them.

It’s always seemed a wee bit daft that we could manage the cash of another authority purely by depositing it with, say, Icelandic banks, and that might not need to be regulated. But if we wanted the secturiy of buying T-bills or Gilts, it would.

However, I do think the whole concept of ‘centres for excellence’ works. I know at one stage a number of my colleagues had quite a lot of money with the DMO even when other government guaranteed instruments were yielding much more. We were tempted to look into setting up a government bond fund for them at competitive fee rates.

Room151: Is the treasury centres for excellence idea a well-developed one? How far down the road are we with them?

IE: It depends how you get into it. I see people in London like Jonathan (Jonathan Hunt, Westminster & Tri-Borough) who bring a certain level of expertise that maybe some of the smaller authorities don’t have. I think it’s fair to say that the report the Audit Commission did after Iceland found that there was quite a range of experience and ability within authorities. Some are very well geared up and know what they’re doing and some less so. So is there willingness for authorities to look at an arrangement where bigger, better resourced teams manage cash on their behalf?

Certainly up here, the reality is that most people don’t want to give up their treasury function. A, because it’s quite sexy and B, because compared to some of the other shared service initiatives there’s simply not a great saving to be generated in terms of people.

Room151: How would Scottish independence affect treasurers north of border in respect of ratings and their relationship with the DMO and PWLB?

IE: As it stands at the moment because it’s a couple of years away even until a referendum I think it’s basically business as usual.

Room151: What role can the treasury play in shoring up the balance sheet?

IE: For years treasury management has dug local authorities out of large holes in their revenue budgets. If you look in our last annual report you’ll see how much the cost of our debt has come down and how much cumulatively we have saved over the last ten years or so – about £150m – which is a phenomenal amount. I don’t think that treasury managers across the country have really got the credit for what they have delivered. The difficulty of course is that debt restructuring was effectively killed off by the PWLB a few years ago now so there’s very little pro-active debt management we can do at the moment to make the big, big savings we did during the 2000s.

Share

You may also like...

  • Q&A with Amundi’s Nathalie Coffre Q&A with Amundi’s Nathalie Coffre 13 Nov, 2014
  • Interview: Ben Still & David Hewitt of the Sheffield City Region LEP Interview: Ben Still & David Hewitt of the Sheffield City Region LEP 3 Oct, 2013
  • Interview: Doug Heron, CEO, Lothian Pension Fund Interview: Doug Heron, CEO, Lothian Pension Fund 1 Dec, 2019
  • Treasury Q&A: Innes Edwards, Edinburgh City Council Treasury Q&A: Innes Edwards, Edinburgh City Council 3 Mar, 2016

1 Comment

  1. m_jensen says:
    2012/11/02 at 11:17

    Credit spreads in sovereign and supranational bonds currently offer good value for cash, buy and hold investors whilst liquidity in the class is also very high.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    Impact Awards: Cheltenham’s tech hub and Hackney’s recovery from cyber attack: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards spotlight  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we explore Cheltenham Borough Council’s… dlvr.it/Rxg53h pic.twitter.com/iH8oGKOfSs

    Room151 4 days ago

    Collaboration the key to district recovery post-pandemic: Regeneration and economic growth will depend on districts’ ability to secure funding and work with public and private partners, argues Sanjiv Kohli. Covid hit us in March 2020 and immediately[...] dlvr.it/Rxb4VK pic.twitter.com/FiMynEQVPU

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 1 week ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 1 week ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 1 week ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 1 week ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 1 week ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 1 week ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Government invites 20 new City Deal bids
  • Next story Settlement date blues

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.