• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Interview: Ben Still & David Hewitt of the Sheffield City Region LEP

0
  • by Jo Tura
  • in Interviews
  • — 3 Oct, 2013

Ben Still is the chief executive of the Sheffield City Region Local Enterprise Partnership and David Hewitt is economic policy officer. The City Region comprises the nine local authority areas of Barnsley, Bassetlaw, Bolsover, Chesterfield, Derbyshire Dales, Doncaster, North East Derbyshire, Rotherham and Sheffield and has been working on plans for a combined Sheffield City Region authority. The area also has a City Deal. Consultation on the Combined Authority ends this Friday.

Room 151: How does the relationship work between the LEP, the City Region and the Combined Authority work?

David Hewitt: If you think of all the areas where the local authorities and the private sector work together, that is the Sheffield City Region.

A subset of those areas are under the direction of the Local Enterprise Partnership and the LEP board and soon the Combined Authority will provide the accountable body for those areas as well as the mechanisms for contract and the ability to hold public funds.

There are also areas outside the scope of the LEP where the nine local authorities look to work together on a more independent basis. Public transport in South Yorkshire would be an example where the Combined Authority will manage that function, so it wouldn’t be a LEP function.

Room 151: How is the Combined Authority the accountable body and who will provide the S151 role?

Ben Still: The key thing with the accountable body is that the Combined Authority itself is a statutory body, it has been established in statute and has many of the characteristics of a local authority.

The set-up is similar to the one in Manchester in that the Combined Authority will have its own S151, Larraine Manley, the S151 for Sheffield City Council. The chief executives and the Leaders sat down and decided who should be the S151.

The set-up has tried to ensure that the Combined Authority structures were light touch and efficient, drawing upon the partner bodies where it can.

Room 151: What was the genesis of the Combined Authority?

DH: It was initially driven through something called the Northern Way Agenda in 2007/8, which was about closing the gap between the North and the rest of the country. That evolved into the Sheffield City Region Forum, which was closer to the geography we have today and led to an informal Leader’s group and LEP. This is the next step, putting it into legislation.

BS: In the early years things ebbed and flowed. Derbyshire Dales were an associate member as was Bassetlaw. If all goes to plan the CA will be the accountable body from April 2014.

Room 151: How did things crystalise to where you are now?

BS: It has been a staged process which has been running for a year. The Leaders felt it was important that they understood each step in the decision process and took 6-9 months to provide themselves with enough comfort that this was a sensible thing to do. They’ve not entered into it lightly.

Now we’re working on things like how financial transactions, HR and legal will work to support the Combined Authority.

Room 151: Is the Combined Authority limited?

DH: It’s limited to economic development, regeneration and transport. It’s not a county council and so will be limited in its remit. Equally it’s limited in terms of local ambition, it won’t strip function and power away from local authorities but will lead on a small number of strategic issues.

BS: The way to think of it is that the Combined Authority will be the body that is responsible for our growth plan with the LEP setting the direction and key objectives for that plan. The CA will sit behind the LEP being the accountable body and making sure that contracting arrangements are in place and efficient.

Room 151: You have a consultation on the CA closing this week, are you expecting or hoping for anything in particular to come out of that?

BS: It is a statutory process that the Secretary of State needs to go through before laying down the order so we’re not expecting anything from that perspective not least because all nine authorities have already taken it through their own councils. I think what will be interesting is what the counties, Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire will say. They’ve both indicated that they will be supportive but cautious because potentially they might see this as setting a course that might be detrimental to them, although we don’t think that is the case.

We also have our issue with government over the name of the CA because we suggest it be called Sheffield City Region CA and the government wants to call it the South Yorkshire Authority. Our response to the consultation will suggest a compromise name. We can’t say just yet what that will be.

Room 151: How does the Sheffield City Region Investment Fund (SCRIF) work?

BS: The way to think about SCRIF, which is the capsule term for our investment fund, is that it is several things. At its heart it is a decision making framework, a mechanism to allow our Leaders Board, which will in the future become our Combined Authority, to prioritise their investments at a City Region level and ensure value for money in those decisions.

It can draw in any funding at a City Region level or below that the Leaders Board want to pitch in. At the moment it pretty much only comprises the devolved major scheme transport money from the Department of Transport.

We would look to put to the Leaders the option that they could put other capital funds alongside that into SCRIF if they wanted to.

Room 151: So the aim is to put other funds from the nine authorities in the Sheffield City Region into the structure?

BS: Kind of. Where the funds are allocated from government at a City Region level they’re either in or they’re not. Then local authorities are able to put in any additional funds (as local match funding) they want to. They’re also looking at raising money locally through borrowing.

The idea is that SCRIF allows you to maximise value for money spent because you can prioritise over the whole City Region and it also helps speed up delivery because a scheme promoter can come to SCRIF and get one decision at one time rather than have to go to various places to get funding.

As part of the City Deal we got flexibility to spend transport money on things other than transport. The majority of our current infrastructure schemes have got transport in them but some are packages and there are some with no transport at all in them.

Room 151: How much is in the fund at the moment?

BS: In the City Deal we got ten years of transport funding to go in there and that is £113m. We’re then looking at options through our Regional Growth Plan, through European funding and some other sources. There are 19 schemes on the list we have published and they should start at or around 2015.

There are no very major infrastructure schemes in there but there are things like Junction 36 of the M1 where we’ll develop the site by building units and putting in the infrastructure. We have the last kilometer of the link road between the M18 and the Doncaster/ Sheffield airport, a suite of measures around developing the Waverley housing development and an associated advanced manufacturing park in Rotherham.

Room 151: A number of combined authorities seem to be surfacing at the moment, with Manchester, Liverpool, Newcastle, Leeds and yourselves at various stages. Are they the solution to the local government resources problems?

BS: It is local authority’s response to the government wanting to engage with localities at a city region level. The government wants to use LEPs and devolve funds at a LEP level and we have seen that over the last couple of years. The challenge has always been that LEPs can’t spend public money. So creating combined authorities that mirror the geography of the LEPs is a sensible way for local authorities to crack the accountable body problem.

Share

You may also like...

  • How a digital revolution is upon us 7th Feb, 2022
  • ‘Funding cuts have changed the scale, shape and scope of local government’ 31st Jan, 2022
  • Pension power: beyond net zero 4th Feb, 2022
  • Jackie Weaver calls for more ‘hyper-localism’ to revitalise local government 9th Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 7 hours ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 1 day ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 1 day ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 1 day ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 1 day ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 2 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 2 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 3 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Southwest One Deal, Unitarisation Moves, Liverpool Developer Loans, Oxford Borrowing Cap
  • Next story Accounting for bonds and funds

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares