• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

LGPS Q&A: Fiona Miller talks about progress on Border to Coast and an LGPS infrastructure fund

0
  • by Editor
  • in Interviews · LGPSi
  • — 11 Jul, 2017

Photo: Pixabay, CC0

Cumbria County Council’s Fiona Miller is at the heart of efforts to build the Border to Coast pension pool as well as a project to create a cross-pool group to invest in infrastructure. Room151 caught up with her to talk progress so far.

Fiona Miller. Photo: PLSA

Room151: So how is pooling going? Are you on course, broadly speaking?
Fiona Miller: We (Border to Coast, or BCPP) were the only pool in the spring update to government that said we will be ready by June, not April 2018. We said right from the beginning that if we didn’t get approval from the minister in September 2016 then, because of local elections, it would be very difficult for us to recruit people by the April deadline, which has proved the case.

We had elections in seven out of the twelve Border to Coast councils and have seem some churn in others; not necessarily at the pension fund chair level, but it has meant that we’ve had to get people back in place before we can run the recruitment process for the pool.

The interview for the chairman was last week and then everything sort of tiers down from that.

Room151: How have things changed in respect of how the twelve funds make investment decisions?
FM: They haven’t.

Room151: So you get to June 2018 and the light goes on and everything changes?
Fiona Miller: No, that’s not how it works at all. I mean basically now we are doing a lot of collaborative work. If anybody’s looking at anything, or they’ve done due diligence on some things, then we’re not advising each other but we are sharing anything we’re looking at.

So, there’s a greater degree of awareness and collaboration across the partner funds. We’ve  already secured savings on the passive management. The majority of us had the same passive manager, so that’s in the bag and done.

There is only so much capacity both internally and in the market to bring on regulated sub-funds which means this huge transition process is planned over a period of time. The plan is for a three-to-five year transition period. In the meantime,  until the pool has a sub-fund up and running that meets the requirements of each of the partner funds to put one of their allocations into, then the funds just continue as normal. None of us can afford to be out of the market for a prolonged period of time.

This idea that seems to be held that June 2018 is a big bang moment when we move £43bn—which is what we have as of March 31, 2017—is  just not how this is going to work.

An additional issue for BCPP, and key to understanding how the  transition process will work, is that we’ve also got to manage how we move the three internal teams. We’ve got a huge book of internal management—about a third of the pool by assets under management (AUM)—when we move those staff, so we’ve got to be able to trade effectively for those funds. The regulatory permissions being sought  require that there will be an initial  focus on getting those internal teams up and running.


Register for the Room151 LGPS Quarterly Briefing


Room151: Is there a plan in terms of how that percentage of internally managed money might change after 2018 or during the three to five-year period?

FM:  We see internal management very much as a philosophical decision for each fund. There is absolutely no compulsion for any externally managed fund to go internal. For those of us that think [internal management] is a good idea and may consider taking advantage of it, we will want to see a  track record first.

It’s up to each fund to decide whether it wants internal or external management. Wherever there’s an internal offering, there will be an external offering and it will be for each fund to make a decision on a sub-fund by sub-fund basis.

Several of the funds, and I can speak for Cumbria here, think there is tremendous value in some of the internal offering and we will be looking just to get a feel for that internal performance.

But once the pool is up and running and the teams are in place, we will seriously be looking at moving some of our assets to internal management. But the proposal as submitted to DCLG does not assume any savings  on the back of doing that.

Room151: Arguably, there are some less problematic pools than others. Where do you put Border to Coast in that scheme of things?
FM: This is horrendously difficult for anybody and we’ve all got different problems. I mean, London corralling 33 councils has its own set of problems; us managing internal and external money and having to TUPE staff brings its own problems; Northern having only three partners of very different sizes has its own problems; Brunel— obviously they’re leading the way with a different structure and that will have its own problems.

I see each pool doing something slightly different with a different set of problems and we’re all working unbelievably hard to make this happen. I’ve said all along there is no single model that fits all pools, each pool must be structured to meet the needs and capabilities of the underlying funds.

Room151: Are they the problems you thought you’d see when you set out on the journey?
FM: It’s a project, and it’s a project that’s off the scale in both size and complexity. Nobody has done this at the scale and speed we’re looking to do it. It doesn’t matter who you talk to: the regulators haven’t seen movement of this scale and speed before; the custodians can’t imagine moving this much money into some many newly created sub-funds.

The biggest issue is people understanding that local government legislation and Financial Conduct Authority legislation do not necessarily make good bed fellows. So, yes, but as with any large project we have a detailed project plan, have employed a lot of professional support and then just tackle each unexpected issue as it comes up and tick them off the list.

There’s no solution out there that you can just go and lift off the shelf. … The fact that we’ve got as far as we have, as fast as we have, I think speaks volumes about the the dedication of the implementation officers and the support received from the councillors and statutory officers to help the fund officers make this work..

Room151: Can you give us an example of how the different legislation is problematic?
FM: It’s things like ensuring you’re Teckal compliant, which is the local government legislation. So that we can actually give this pool our money, we have to be able to demonstrate significant control of the company. But the FCA legislation is all about independence; independence of decision making and no external influence in investments. That’s been a very fine line, writing all the legal documents to make sure that we are Teckal compliant but we are a standalone company in so far as investment management is concerned.

Infrastructure

Room151: You’re also responsible for a huge infrastructure project. Can you give us an update on that?
FM:  We’ve set up the officers’ cross-pool group and that is there for us to share experience, and gain efficiencies if possible through doing things not just within the pools but across pools.

For example, if you’re seeking a legal opinion, two or three pools can get together to save on costs. We also wanted to ensure a consistent messaging to and from government, so both cabinet office, DCLG and LGA representatives attend each meeting.

It’s been a very, very successful officer group. It doesn’t make any decisions as such, it is purely about collaboration at the level above your individual pool. In addition, there’s now three work streams from the main group: infrastructure, responsible investing and, now, a tax workstream.

On infrastructure, which is the group I chair, we’ve had a lot of meetings with chief investment officers of the big Canadian, Dutch and Australian pension funds to discuss how they invest and what works well and how they would do it if they were starting afresh. There’s no point looking at something that was set up to answer a question 20 years ago and assume that the market is the same now.

The one thing that is clear from everybody we’ve spoken to is this isn’t just about capital. This is about the governance structure you put in [place] to make this work.

There’s a lot of money chasing infrastructure, especially in the UK at the moment. Projects have their pick of who they want to actually take the money from, and a lot of it is about the governance structure and whether you are a reliable partner? Can you commit the money? Can you make the deal work? Have you got the resource to do the due diligence? All the things that are just impossible to marshal as 89 funds.

So, any infrastructure platform, or whatever it is we end up building, has to follow after the pools.

It’s only when you’ve got the staff and the delegations to the pools that you can operate a reasonable governance structure.

At the moment we’re just constructing a template to go out to all the funds to ask what they want to buy from any collaborative platform. It is such a huge asset class and we’ve had a lot of conversations with governments because they have one definition of what infrastructure is and the industry and ourselves tend to operate to a different definition.

Room151: How does that differ?
FM: Things like social housing we would tend to put in a property allocation. They would call it infrastructure.

There’s just been a lot of educational discussions going back and forth about who means what when we’re discussing infrastructure so we can get to a point where at least we have a common language.

Room151: Now that there’s GLIL and the Pensions Infrastructure Platform (PIP) and your own project; is it fair to say that this idea of national infrastructure platform won’t happen?
FM: No I don’t think so. I mean PIP is what it is.  Is it what people want to buy? I don’t know. Then there’s GLIL and the governance structure around that at the moment couldn’t take in extra funds, so you would need a change there. Could both of those come in as managers through a national collaboration? I don’t know. We’re not at that point yet but nothing is off the table.

What is certain is that there will be a collaboration across the pools in one form or another to look at infrastructure for the UK. Now, none of us, as far as I know, are looking just for a UK infrastructure allocation. Cumbria has a 9% infrastructure allocation and none of that goes to a dedicated UK investment.

At Border to Coast, we are very clear, whatever national platform is built, it will form only a small part of our infrastructure offering.

Infrastructure needs to be global to be well-diversified and cost effective.

Room151: Local government is commercialising rapidly, particularly in commercial property and arguably wants to invest more in infrastructure. Is there scope, given the agenda for LGPS, to invest more in UK infrastructure, to work with local government?
FM: The LGPS will look at everything on a deal-by-deal basis and on a risk/return basis. If there is a profitable deal to be had at the right risk that meets our asset allocation, we’ll take it every day of the week.

Room151: But you won’t be doing local government any special favours? If they can get very cheap borrowing from PWLB, it will be difficult for you to beat that, I suppose?
FM: I cannot see why we would ever be able to offer borrowing at similar rates to PWLB.

But from a pension fund’s point of view, if I can offer a loan to the market for a similar risk level and get more return for my money, why would I give it to the council? That’s not a funds duty.

Some of the deals that Manchester has done, collaborative arrangements between the council, the pension fund and a third party, they make sense. And I think at scale, with resource in the funds, potentially they become a lot easier to do. But they’ll be done because they have the right risk/return for the fund, they give a social benefit for the council and they give a financial return for the third party.

Everybody will have to be clear what each party’s getting out of that deal and those may be different things, but that doesn’t mean that it can’t be a very constructive collaboration. There’s nothing off the table as such, it just has to stack up for the pension fund on a risk return basis, which some of the deals out there currently have proved can be achieved.

Room151: Are you optimistic? After the pools are all up and running, that you’ll be able to achieve sort of the goals that you want to?
FM:  I’m very optimistic, yes. There’s an awful long way to go and a lot of tears before then, but the benefits of doing this are huge. Savings is one of them, but for the internal teams, it helps mitigate the key man (or woman) risk. You’ve got opportunity to collaborate in the pool and outside the pool. There’s an awful lot more intangible collaboration going on already because our people meet monthly. So yes, definitely optimistic.

Fiona Miller is head of pensions and financial services, and deputy section 151 officer at Cumbria County Council.

Share

You may also like...

  • Pension pools warned on governance structures Pension pools warned on governance structures 21 Apr, 2016
  • Investing in water: demographics, market access and political risk Investing in water: demographics, market access and political risk 23 Jan, 2019
  • Fund mergers off the table as DCLG announces new LGPS consultation Fund mergers off the table as DCLG announces new LGPS consultation 2 May, 2014
  • Preview: An interview with Mike Jensen Preview: An interview with Mike Jensen 7 May, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 hours ago

    ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom: Recent speculation that the UK may be heading toward negative interest rates prompts questions for treasury officers managing local authority funds at LATIF. Speculation is rife that the UK… dlvr.it/Rr3Mrj pic.twitter.com/wtxYAB20PO

    Room151 2 days ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 1 week ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 1 week ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 1 week ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 1 week ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 1 week ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 1 week ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 1 week ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 1 week ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 1 week ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 1 week ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 1 week ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 1 month ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 1 month ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Agent 151: Grenfell inquiry must look at government housing policy
  • Next story Richard Harbord: Pension board scrutiny can improve governance

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK