• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

NAO on the New Homes Bonus

0
  • by Jo Tura
  • in Interviews
  • — 10 Apr, 2013

The National Audit Office recently published a 42-page report on New Homes Bonus and has called for an “urgent and essential” review of the scheme so that the Department of Communities and Local Government can understand the “substantial financial risks to local authorities”. NAO director for the study, Angela Hands, and audit manager for the study Andrew Whittingham talked to Room 151.

Room 151: One of the main questions you wanted to get the answer to with your report was “is the New Homes Bonus Scheme well designed to achieve its objectives?” Is it?

Andrew Whittingham: We were complimentary about much of the design. Certainly when we went out and spoke with local authorities they were complimentary about the design in that it was easy for them to understand and to explain to their communities. There were other elements we were positive about that the Department had worked on during the consultation, for example that the payments were based on average council tax levels across the country rather than locally.

So generally we were positive about the design but we didn’t find much evidence that it was having much impact at the moment.

Angela Hands: The sense that we got was that where it was having most impact was in areas that would have been having quite a lot of building anyway. It was supporting councils in those areas in the kind of infrastructure and resourcing that they need; discussions with developers, identifying the right sites, consultation with communities, getting through the planning and all of that sort of thing, those areas were the kind of things that the money was being used for. That was a relatively small proportion of the money and how it was being used though.

Room 151: In the report you talk about local authorities that have difficulty with housebuilding and the fact that in these areas authorities are “more likely to spend any bonus on maintaining statutory services”. Can you talk to us about that?

AH: Where we’re coming from is that in the kind of authorities I was just talking about there is a strong incentive to keep some of the money back and spend it on the areas we just discussed. In other authorities though, that incentive is not there and many of them talked about the fact that they couldn’t afford to put money into that kind of expenditure to any great extent. They knew that the market in their area wasn’t going to be receptive to substantial new housing anyway.

Having accepted that the conditions were not right for them to spend the money in those areas, they might as well spend the money on maintaining statutory services.

Quite a lot of the finance directors in particular that we spoke to were making it clear that they were trying their best to spend this money on discretionary services rather than on core budgets that they could see could store up potential problems for them in the future – they were trying to spend it on services that would have to be reduced anyway.

There were two advantages to them doing that: firstly, they were spending on a service that could be reduced later if they ran out of money and the secondly,  it was more visible to communities that they were retaining their services and not reducing them.

AW: It is important to say that we didn’t survey local authorities for this study so we can’t make any quantitative statements about the proportions of local authorities using the bonus to maintain statutory services and those that are using it on housing-related services.

Room 151: Our readership would be interested to know what sort of proportion of councils are using the Bonus for frontline services.

AH: Our general sense was that a lot of the money, a very large amount, is being spent on statutory services, but that is not from an across the board survey. Because the focus of the report is on the Department, not on local authorities. We didn’t get too deep into what they are doing with the money because it wasn’t the focus of what we looked at.

Room 151: Can you tell us about the arithmetical error the Department made in calculating the projected number of new homes?

AW: Overall we didn’t think the modeling was realistic. We make the point that it was based on unrealistic assumptions. Furthermore, we found an arithmetical error in the modeling. If the Department are going to model these initiatives and ministers are then going to use the output from these models to state how many homes are likely to be built they have got to be realistic. To have an error such as the one we found which reduces the number by about a third means that the quality of the modeling is not good enough.

AH: We state in the report that the whole model wasn’t a realistic model, it wasn’t based on any evidence of the behaviour that local authorities would follow when this bonus came in. It was based on the Department’s idea of what local authorities would do and not any more than that.

AW: Absolutely. We didn’t have any evidence that they had gone out and talked to local authorities in different circumstances and asked them how they would respond to the bonus. We were not impressed with the model.

Room 151: You found shortcomings in the design of the survey on New Homes Bonus that the Department conducted. What were they?

AW: The main thing was they had not added up the responses correctly so in fact in their report on the outcome of the survey, all the percentages of those in favour and not in favour were wrong. It is a very similar point to the arithmetical error: if they had properly quality-assured their work they would have realised that they were not adding things up correctly.

Room 151: What is the main recommendation to have come from this report?

AH: They should have been trying to set the monitoring up right from the start. What you would expect is that they do the modeling properly and use the results of the modeling to work with local government. That is really important. Working with local government they should then try to see if what they predicted in the first instance is actually what happens. There hasn’t been anything done on that. They decided right from the beginning to start doing the monitoring in the third year. They based that on its being a very long term programme and of course houses take a great deal of time to get built.

Our argument, though, is that that doesn’t stop you monitoring right from the beginning what starts to happen. There are lots of indicators you need to review if you are doing a scheme like this, not just whether or not the houses get built. There are things like planning data, they could be talking to local authorities about the numbers of approaches they’re getting from developers, talking to developers themselves. It surprised us that there was virtually nothing like that going on.

AW: Given the New Homes Bonus is designed to change behaviour, and not just of people within local authority but its developers and its communities too, we were surprised that they haven’t done anything to look at whether that is actually happening.

AH: There was no dialogue that we could see between local government and the Department on this.

AW: And as well as monitoring the impact of the bonus (we obviously talk about the financial implications of the bonus because of the redistribution of core funding) we’re also saying, there is another reason why the Department should be monitoring right from the beginning and not just looking at whether the new homes are getting built, but what is the change that will ultimately lead to new homes and what is the wider financial impact of the scheme.

AH: And using that to help start to think about the impact of the changes in council tax localisation and business rates, these are all incentive-based schemes and there is a tendency in government to only evaluate and review things that look pretty concrete. They don’t seem to recognise yet that they need to look at how incentives play out. If government wants to use incentive-based funding they need to start developing ways of looking at it. Incentive-based funding is not predictable.

Room 151: They particularly need to get it right if they’re going to fund it from core funding.

AH: Well yes, it’s the unpredictability of it and the fact that you need to predict at the beginning and then review your predictions on a regular basis. They just haven’t been doing that. The Department said to us, how would you have done it?

I said I would have looked at my modeling and chosen maybe ten councils to work in depth with. Get a spread of different types of councils and do some detailed work with them. The Department said, oh, yes.

AW: They are doing an annual survey and have done two but that is not enough.

AH: Although we have criticized the survey we’re glad they’ve done it.

AW: Authorities don’t have to respond and they can be anonymous but the thing of most concern is that from one survey to the next the response rate dropped by half. That’s not good and if that is the trend it is a monitoring regime which is getting worse.

AH: The way the Government worked with troubled families showed a very different way of working with local government and that sort of way would be helpful on all programmes, not just the one we are talking about now.

Room 151: Is the next news we can expect on NHB the 2013/14 review?

AH: A Public Accounts Committee on it is very likely to happen, they’re likely to be interested in having a hearing and I think that the Department will want to wait for that. We know they are doing work now because they’ve talked to us about it but they will also want to know the outcome of any hearing before a review. They are beginning to do some of the review work now from what I have gathered.

Share

You may also like...

  • Ben Lockwood on bonds, MMFs and understanding risk Ben Lockwood on bonds, MMFs and understanding risk 11 Oct, 2012
  • Interview: Public sector deposit fund reaches £1bn as councils look for liquid safe havens 3 Jun, 2020
  • Q&A with Dom Piper: evolving treasury investment strategies Q&A with Dom Piper: evolving treasury investment strategies 25 Apr, 2014
  • Richard Paver on cuts, borrowing and derivatives Richard Paver on cuts, borrowing and derivatives 21 Jun, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    All three days of #LATIF & FDs' Summit are available on our webcast channel gotostage.com/channel/room151

    Room151 5 days ago

    FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’: As Room151’s FDs’ Summit conference explores local government’s investment in commercial property MPs once again lable it a “significant risk to government”. Once again MPs… dlvr.it/Rr7lZx pic.twitter.com/jPvcZjDAS4

    Room151 5 days ago

    Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine: Sponsored article: Salman Ahmed argues monetary policy, a global vaccine rollout and fiscal stimulus are likely to put “upward pressure” on bond yields. Much like the latter half of 2020,[...] dlvr.it/Rr60nt pic.twitter.com/qsymBWmKmV

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom: Recent speculation that the UK may be heading toward negative interest rates prompts questions for treasury officers managing local authority funds at LATIF. Speculation is rife that the UK… dlvr.it/Rr3Mrj pic.twitter.com/wtxYAB20PO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Haircuts, monetary easing and EU membership: what a week!
  • Next story Enfield Energy Contract, Slough Seeks Chinese Investors, Fraud Funding, Data Disaster Looms

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK