• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

China and commodities

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan · LGPSi
  • — 21 Mar, 2012

It is very hard to read China’s data and to have a clear understanding of what lies ahead but it is clear that the Chinese economy has performed strongly over recent years, despite the global financial crisis and its aftermath which involved a fall in global GDP in 2009 – the first time output at a global level has contracted in at least 60 years.

China’s relative strength is in part the result of China not having a financial crisis, and also the result of China’s massive policy stimulus. The stimulus achieved its objective of boosting growth, but as it has begun to fade, so it has exposed China’s economy to new challenges, and given the historically unprecedented development path followed by China over the past 30 years, the outlook for the Chinese economy is almost, by definition, uncertain.

Against this backcloth, there are a range of views on the outlook for economic growth and in particular for basic material demand and when assessing the pace of growth in basic material demand in the near term, arguably the best indicator is current momentum, and at a macro level the key indicators of demand are fixed asset investment and industrial production.

In tracking momentum in China, it is important to assess high-frequency movements, reflecting distortions seen in the level of activity as a result of stimulus measures. Meanwhile, as with many economies, fixed asset investment (FAI) flows are highly volatile month to month and quarter to quarter, as by their nature, many large investments are relatively lumpy. Although many analysts have suggested that investment is slowing (some suggest sharply), an analysis of the level of real investment shows that investment growth through February remains very much on trend (no slowdown). Indeed, after dipping in December, as often happens toward year-end, investment rebounded very strongly in the first two months of 2012. Commodity-intensive construction also rebounded in early 2012.

Much of the bear argument about FAI over the remainder of 2012 focuses on the housing sector. Although private housing sales have been weak, seasonal data suggest that they have stabilized and may have even begun to recover. In addition it looks as if a small fall in private housing sales will be offset by robust commercial construction. House prices themselves have fallen, driven lower by policy rather than a result of a deterioration in underlying demand. Macro-prudential policy tightening appears to have come to an end and broader monetary policy has already been eased (normalized), with M2 growth returning to around its average pace.

In contrast to continued robust growth in fixed asset investment, the data for industrial production (IP) for January and February, as well as revisions to earlier data, clearly indicate a gradual slowing, with the pace of growth in Q1 this far this year well below the average of previous years. Looking forward, the new orders component of the PMI looks to have bottomed and this, combined with the gradual recovery in the US, Europe, and Japan, suggests that IP growth is also likely to have troughed.

While we can expect a modest improvement over coming months, we may not see a return to the growth rates seen in recent years, in part because exports look relatively weak and in part because the slowdown has been policy-driven: the government now prefers growth in the 8%-9% range rather than the historical 10%-plus. As for the numbers themselves, the evidence is that IP growth is stabilizing at a weak level. The March data are released in early April and may confirm this trend, with numbers on air-conditioner production and motor cars consistent with this conclusion.

Looking beyond the near-term data, a key issue for China is the outlook for inflation. The rhetoric of the authorities is cautious but stabilisation of global food prices has removed the main risk. Importantly, both the headline CPI and the non-food CPI have actually fallen a little over recent months for the first time since 2009, and the fallback in inflationary pressures provides the authorities with scope to ease policy if they so desire. We can also get some insight on potential GDP growth for China from the nature and scale of inflationary pressures, and the trajectory of inflation over the past year suggests that potential GDP growth remains comfortably above 8%.

Looking further out, there is uncertainty on the structural pace of commodity consumption in China. One objective of China’s 12th 5-Year Plan is to rebalance the Chinese economy away from exports and investment, toward consumption and efficient, value-adding industry and services. That said, we should not expect a step change this year. Premier Wen has stated that the Chinese authorities will target 7½% GDP growth in 2012, down from the 8% target of recent years but the official GDP target for the 10th 5-Year Plan (2001-2005) was 7% and that GDP growth came in at 9.8%, while growth between 2006 and 2010 averaged 11.2% despite the 11th 5-Year Plan targeting 7.5%. Meanwhile, although the rate of investment has been very strong (the flow), the level of the capital stock in China remains very low compared to that of most industrial economies and, more importantly, compared to the needs (recognized in Beijing) of the country’s large and crowded urban and rural populations – suggesting that much remains to be built. The IMF presently expects investment growth of 9.4% in 2012 and 8.9% in 2013, only modestly slower than that in 2011, consistent with very little rebalancing in the near term.

China will remain a very significant contributor to global growth and as it gets bigger so its growth is more important. For example, 10% growth off a base of 100 is the same in terms of absolute increment as 5% growth off a base of 200. In the 1980s, China’s GDP growth averaged 10%, with China contributing less than 10% of global growth. Then in the 1990s, Chinese GDP growth was also 10%, but its contribution stepped up to nearly 20%, and in the 2000s GDP growth again averaged approximately 10%, but the contribution grew to over 25%. Even if Chinese GDP growth slows to 8% per annum in 2012-2014 (substantially slower than in the past decade), its contribution to global growth should continue to increase, to more than a third in the first half of this decade. We can also note that the consensus has almost always underestimated the pace of Chinese growth.

Of course there are risks. A difficult outlook for China’s infrastructure and property sectors, combined with construction-biased Chinese commodity demand, may lead to disappointment in growth expectations for China’s demand for commodities. Also the passing of the baton from one driver of growth to others carries the risk of mismatched timing and can lead to disappointment in demand. Certainly 2012 may be a difficult year for commodity demand and a so-called soft landing could involve commodity demand taking most of the “pain.”

It follows that whilst China’s commodity demand super cycle was driven by China’s extraordinary growth in infrastructure construction, export, and urbanization, China’s commodity demand growth may be significantly below market expectations as the growth rates of these factors fade.

Most economies have undergone transition to consumption-driven growth but what is different about China is its heavy investment/construction-biased growth model. It has made the commodity cycle more powerful in the growth phase and can now work the other way.

We will monitor ongoing developments, especially China’s policies, production, construction and stocking patterns.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • James Bevan: Signs of global growth point to better equity markets James Bevan: Signs of global growth point to better equity markets 27 Jul, 2016
  • Chancellor’s Autumn Statement and the OBR Chancellor’s Autumn Statement and the OBR 5 Dec, 2012
  • Linda Selman on active investment, CIVs and LGPS governance Linda Selman on active investment, CIVs and LGPS governance 22 May, 2014
  • Mike Weston on climate change, infrastructure and meeting the needs of partner funds Mike Weston on climate change, infrastructure and meeting the needs of partner funds 22 Jul, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Price and flexibility leave bonds on the back burner
  • Next story Treasury outflanks the City (again) as PWLB rate drops 20bps

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.