• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

James Bevan: The outlook for rates and fiscal policy

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan
  • — 12 Jan, 2015
James Bevan

In the past few months markets have more or less priced out the possibility of a BoE rate increase this year and have also continued the trend – that dominated much of last year – of steadily reducing the expected terminal rate. Both of those assumptions could be challenged this year.

On the timing of the first rate hike, if the UK economy enjoys solid growth, rising pay growth and falling unemployment, then the market looks extremely mispriced for the first rate increase.Secondly, the MPC’s current forward guidance states that the Committee expects rates to rise only gradually.

This reflects not only judgments on the outlook for inflation-related variables, but also the constraint on the ability of the MPC to normalise policy imposed by the high leverage of the household sector and its sensitivity to short-term interest rates. But there’s the issue as to what happens if rates are hiked late, and the BoE will be wary of getting behind the curve as this might then require more tightening than would be the case if tightening occurs ‘on time’. Thus, with an eye on the possible hit to household spending from significant hikes in rates, and the need to avoid getting too behind in tightening policy, the BoE may decide that to ensure that rates only rise gradually, it needs to start policy normalisation sooner rather than later, perhaps starting to raise rates in Q3, possibly July or August.

If the onset of policy tightening comes sooner than expected, this may also lead markets to reconsider the terminal rate. The MPC’s current forward guidance states that the Committee expects the terminal rate to be below the average rate that prevailed before the financial crisis, and MPC members have signalled that the terminal rate in any tightening cycle could be 2-3%. At present markets are expecting a terminal rate of 1.52%.

A key reason the MPC gave for expecting a lower terminal rate was the wide spread between lending and deposit rates from banks and the Bank Rate relative to the pre-crisis years. That remains the case, but spreads have been narrowing, and the more they narrow, the more they represent de facto monetary loosening that could need to be offset by tighter policy.

One factor that could lead to delayed tightening of monetary policy would be any significant shift to tighter fiscal policy, possibly announced after the May general election. At present the UK suffers from both significant fiscal and external deficits, with the public sector deficit now more or less the same size as the current account deficit, at roughly 6% of UK GDP. These imbalances have persisted for some time without unfortunate market or economic consequences and can continue to do so, but there is a risk that a change in market sentiment precipitates a disorderly and abrupt correction in one or both.

One of the unknowns is how much of the fiscal deficit is structural or cyclical. On most estimates, the UK’s output gap is now relatively small, and this suggests that the deficit is largely structural, and indeed, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimates that the structural deficit is slightly more than 4%. The risk is that it is larger than that, implying the need for significant further fiscal consolidation if the next government is to reduce the deficit to levels that would allow the public sector debt ratio to fall. That looks to be a significant challenge given that since the end of the financial crisis, the UK economy has only experienced two years of fiscal tightening: 2010 and 2011, and since then there has been no further fiscal squeeze, and this may be one reason why the recovery has been so vigorous.

Looking ahead, a new phase of fiscal consolidation would likely dampen demand growth, and if it were on a scale seen in 2010-11, when the tightening was worth around 1.5% of GDP per annum, it would certainly negate the need for monetary policy to slow the economy down to a pace of growth consistent with stable unemployment.

By way of context, the current government’s fiscal plans imply an enormous fiscal squeeze in the next few years, with tightening in 2016-17 on a par with, or even more exacting than, that seen in 2010-11, with that tightening largely in the form of spending cuts, rather than higher tax.

On the practicalities of fiscal consolidation, it can’t be clear whether the general election in May will leave a government with a clear mandate to undertake the scale of fiscal tightening required to deliver a smaller, or non-existent, budget deficit.

At present, spending is historically high while tax revenues are more or less in line with their historical average and although high public spending looks anomalous, the scale of the spending restraint undertaken in the past few years has already reduced spending (in real terms) in areas other than pensions and health, by around 8%. Any realistic plan to reduce public spending towards historical norms would have to involve spending cuts to those areas and politically, that seems challenging for any government.

The alternative, to bring tax revenues up as a share of GDP (to historically high levels), may seem more plausible. But that would involve broad-based increases in taxes that may also prove deeply politically unpalatable. For example, to achieve an increase in tax revenues worth 2% of GDP would require either increasing the income tax rate by 6.4%, or increasing the VAT rate by 6.3%.

So although there may be much discussion about the need to tighten fiscal policy after the election, such tightening will be challenging to implement. If it is implemented, then the case for monetary tightening would be equivalently reduced.But if it is not, then markets may start to become concerned about the persistence of a large fiscal deficit and rising public debt.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Bank shareholders suffer while staff “have it good” Bank shareholders suffer while staff “have it good” 7 Jun, 2012
  • Looking ahead: Investment market prospects for 2019 Looking ahead: Investment market prospects for 2019 21 Jan, 2019
  • Mr Carney at the Bank of England Mr Carney at the Bank of England 27 Nov, 2012
  • US fund flow and US profitability US fund flow and US profitability 12 Mar, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 1 day ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 2 days ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 2 days ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 2 days ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 3 days ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 3 days ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 3 days ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 4 days ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 4 days ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 4 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 1 month ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 1 month ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

    Room151 1 month ago

    2021: Better income outcomes?: Sponsored article: Investors should be mindful of structural challenges posed to income generation as a result of rapid thematic change. Jon Bell looks at the prospects for the coming year.[...] dlvr.it/RndRsw pic.twitter.com/TxVk8aXkMq

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Melanie Dawes becomes DCLG permanent secretary
  • Next story Q&A with Andrew Burns, president of the Society of County Treasurers

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK