• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Reflections on austerity and the Rogoff & Reinhardt stuff

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan
  • — 9 May, 2013

CCLA_James_Bevan_twitter1

There are of course a lot of “mays” and mights”, but on balance we can expect high government debt to be a constraint on the economy, although whether the likely implied constraint was ever enough to justify some of the tougher austerity measures that some governments have seemingly adopted on the basis of the RR study is unlikely.  In reality, we expect that there was a degree of political dogma involved that was being concealed behind the RR work.

Meanwhile, those that have sought to disprove or refute the RR work have often drawn attention to the UK’s seemingly quite reasonable (particularly by the standards of the time) rate of economic growth following the Napoleonic and other wars against the French in the Eighteenth and early Nineteenth centuries, which had left the British government massively indebted. But we may suspect that had other things remained equal, this high debt probably would have – and perhaps indeed did – reduce the economy’s rate of growth over the subsequent generation.

Of course we shall never know whether it did, and if it did by how much, because there were so many moving and changing conditions.  Apart from the likely ‘peace dividend’ of a drop in military expenditure, there was the re-opening of international trade links and the expansion of global trade into new regions.  There was also a lot of relatively exogenous innovation and invention, particularly Trevithick’s refinement of the steam engine in 1815 into a high pressure device that could power the industrial revolution. This was a key moment in boosting the supply side of the UK economy – just as it took the internet to unleash the full power of the computer, so it took the refinement of metal boring and Trevithick’s work to make steam engines properly useful.  Equally, the Repeal of the Corn Laws in the UK in 1846 supported a greater level and faster rate of urbanization which in turn boosted the prospects of manufacturing industries, at the expense of the rural economy, leading to what became known as the ‘great depression’.

These supply side reforms clearly lifted trend growth within the economy quite significantly and will therefore have obscured whether the high public debt burden mattered or not.  Similarly, and much closer to the present day, the arrival of the internet and the capital spending cycle that it initiated in the early to mid 1990s allowed the Clinton Administration to preside almost accidentally over a massive improvement in the US fiscal position with seemingly minimal effort.

But perhaps there are two key issues associated with the debate on RR’s work that are surfacing. First, it is apparent that there is a general and widespread tiring of austerity, with some key politicians calling for policy change. Against this back cloth, budget deficits in many Euroland economies are expanding again, the UK’s deficit has stopped contracting, the Japanese deficit is set to rise again, and if we do get a new global deflation scare later this year, it seems unlikely that the US will continue with its austerity drive.

Secondly, whilst high public debt burdens are likely a problem and this probably justifies moderate austerity over the medium term, solving indebtedness really requires a focus on growth, productivity and value added growth, and deregulation to support the supply side of the economy as with repeal of the Corn Laws. Having the economy grow out from under its debt burden, as the US showed is possible in the mid 1990s, is likely to have more political durability although there are still net winners and losers.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 3 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 3 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 4 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 4 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 5 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 5 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 6 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 6 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Reflections on ECB policy
  • Next story £16.5bn black hole, Adult social care funding, Watford waste, LAMS, MMF exposures, SIBs

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares