• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGA calls for more government funding to support vulnerable children

    May 23, 2022

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Risks seen and unseen

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan
  • — 16 Jul, 2014

jb-banner-grey

In the USA and UK, it looks increasingly likely that QE and the drive to report higher corporate earnings per share (using cash to buy back equities rather than fund productive capital investment) has driven a sharp slowdown in underlying productivity and value added growth. These developments are now also limiting both demand and supply side potential growth.

For most financial market participants, the focus on Fed tightening generally centres around an actual increase in the Fed Funds rate or some other interest rate – but practically, it may be a long time before the Fed can actually regain control of the Fed Funds rate and we may expect that central bankers generally fear raising interest rates and will probably seek to avoid doing so until their economies have sufficient momentum to withstand any adverse bond and/or equity market reactions – and this suggests that they will defer raising rates for as long as possible.

But in this game of bluff, double bluff and expectations management, we can note that the last financial market ‘crisis’ to be caused by an actual rate hike was probably 1994’s bond market and Mexico crisis. The Asian Crisis did not involve an actual rate hike by the Fed and the LTCM event in 1998 certainly did not. The Fed was raising rates around the time of the NASDAQ debacle but the actual peak in the markets actually occurred when the regulators closed down Freddie and Fannie’s then massive activities in, and support for, the corporate bond markets. Conversely, the Fed raised rates between 2004 and 2006 but the global credit boom only failed in 2007-8 when the frailties of CDOs based on matrix mathematics were revealed. Similarly, the sell-off that occurred in markets after QE1 ended did not involve higher rates, and neither did that at the conclusion of QE2.

It may therefore well be that the current credit boom that is driving both the corporate bond markets and by extension the equity markets, and global capital flows, whilst vulnerable to an increase in official rates, may be undone by quite a different event or variable.

One issue is the Fed’s Reverse Repos which were intended to be contractionary for credit, but have been expansionary because the benefit in terms of the implied added collateral within the system caused by the Fed releasing Treasury bonds into the financial system through its reverse repos outweighed the notionally contractionary influence of the commercial banks losing a few of their anyway abundant excess reserves. What this means is that when the Fed stopped doing these reverse repos and in fact reversed many of them in late May and the first two weeks of June, the impact on the system was contractionary (rather than expansionary as the textbooks would have predicted) given the shortage of collateral that this created, and indeed there was a surge in repo market failures as participants found it increasingly difficult to ‘deliver’ collateral. By way of background, after onset of the global financial crisis, the repo markets evolved to become the key short term credit market. But when the Fed removed Treasuries from the system in early June, it created collateral shortage that will have cost those involved 3% penalty rates. Interestingly, the Fed seems to have responded to the problem by conducting more Reverse Repos and by expanding its own asset purchases, with the result that money and credit data have looked much better.

We can draw two conclusions. First, central banking is increasingly tricky with policies causing unintended consequences and the chances of a mistake or unintended consequence is increasing. Secondly, if such a mistake were large enough, then the global financial system could suffer and whilst such a risk does not seem imminent, the risks are rising and we can expect to see volatility beginning to rise. Identifying just what might upset markets is hard, and may well begin with something quite small in itself – such as the Fed’s reverse repo transactions, and back in 2007, the rise and fall of matrix mathematics in product construction and before that the over-reliance on VaR to measure ‘risk’.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 4 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 4 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 4 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 4 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 5 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 5 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 5 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 5 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 5 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 6 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Two investment opportunities: challenger banks Vs the bond agency
  • Next story Aberdeen appointed for £50m alternatives mandate

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK