• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Thoughts on the Fed and their agenda

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan
  • — 8 Jul, 2014

jb-banner-grey

The latest US jobs report will have supported the optimistic view of the outlook for the US economy, but we need some caution given that much of the jobs growth came from the public sector and average hourly wage inflation on a three month annualised basis remains below the average for the period following onset of the global financial crisis, albeit that the economy is doing significantly better than it was a few months ago.

To put the jobs data in context and looking forward, for the US economy to achieve a rate of real growth of GDP of 2%-2.5% for 2014 as a whole, annualised GDP growth for the second half of this year needs to be substantially above 3%, and the latest jobs data are only just consistent with this hypothetical target. On the basis of the latest jobs numbers, US GDP growth in 2014 will likely be a little lower than it was in 2013 and the pattern of there being two strong quarters followed by two weak quarters and then two strong quarters, which has been in place since 2009, remains intact. For the economy to achieve at least 3% GDP growth for 2014, there likely needs to be half a million new jobs growth per month on average from here.

Equity markets are optimistic on this front and anticipate that interest rates will need to rise to head off inflationary risks and see the revival of China’s economy as an additional reason for the Fed to consider some form of tightening.

Based on the data, there is even a rationale for the Fed to consider tightening right now, given that although the average rate of GDP expenditure growth in real terms has only been 1.7% since end 2008, and 0.7% since 2005, demand pressure measures of capacity utilisation suggest that the economy may already be operating at a rate that is slightly above its ‘natural rate’, with the result that the current account deficit has seemingly ceased improving and some signs of non-traded goods price inflation have begun to appear, including with regards to property rents. But this doesn’t mean that the Fed may actually want to tighten here, as Mrs Yellen has been signalling over recent weeks, and central banks are giving the impression that few if any of those engaged in QE would raise interest rates without nominal GDP growth having accelerated to a 5% or perhaps even a 7% annualised rate of growth. We may suspect that many central banks probably expect or believe that as soon as they signal ‘proper tightening’ there will be a poor market reaction as in 1994, certainly in fixed income markets, that will both damage wealth and raise effective borrowing rates within their economies – and it looks to be the case that most central banks do not intend to tighten before there is considerable momentum within their economies and this 5–7% nominal GDP ‘target’ seems to be about the norm. Moreover, given that trend GDP growth in the USA may now be around 1.7%, and only 0.5% in Japan, these 5-7% nominal GDP targets imply that inflation rates will likely have to go a lot higher than they are today before the central banks will actually react.

We may also suspect that most governments around the world hope for a dose of unanticipated inflation to erode the real value of their debt burdens, and there is therefore probably a political bias within the developed world economic systems towards inflation rates rising over the medium term. But hope is one thing, delivery potentially another, and it may be quite difficult for developed economies to achieve sustained higher inflation rates.

Meanwhile, a clear consequence of US QE is the extent to which the US corporate sector has re-geared itself. For example, in 1986 when Kaufmann et al were fretting about rising debt levels in US corporations, the total debt liabilities of incorporated non-financial businesses in the US stood at 37% of annual GDP. By the end of the NASDAQ boom, this ratio had increased to 45% of GDP, and by 2007, at the height of the global credit boom, corporate indebtedness had risen to 49% of GDP. Today, the ratio is 56% of GDP – an all-time high, and data from SIFMA suggest that US corporate bond net issuance is now running at the equivalent of 9% of GDP per annum, and this is 50% higher than it was only two years ago and perhaps as much as five times the post-WWII average.

Importantly, this massive corporate borrowing is being used to fund stock buy-backs, dividend payments and perhaps as much as $500 billion of stock option related pay-outs per annum. These operations are in turn producing considerable wealth gains for equity owners, and in so doing in effect discourage investment in the real economy, and hence the fall in trend GDP growth.

It’s also worth noting that during 1998-9 and the peak of the NASDAQ Bubble, corporate bond issuance was relatively high by historical standards but High Yield debt issuance amounted only 15–20% of total issuance, and during the bond issuance boom of 2006, only 16% of the debt issuance was High Yield, but today, 30%-32% of corporate bond issuance is High Yield.

Based on these figures, with the corporate sector’s debt burden rising at more than three times the rate of nominal GDP growth, the implied financial fragility of the US corporate sector has increased markedly over recent years, both in terms of total indebtedness and also the likely ‘credit quality’ of much of the borrowing but whereas in the early 1990s, the average maturity of corporate debt issuance was well below 10 years and in the mid-2000s, the average maturity was around a decade, today the average maturity is almost 14 years. This suggests that companies which have succeeded in issuing debt are well protected from most risks bar an absolute collapse in nominal GDP and an outbreak of deflation, and the flip-side question is why, given that most investors appear to believe that inflation rates will rise over the long term, so much funding was provided to support issuance of ultra-long duration low yielding bonds.

At present US companies have about $800bn of ‘free cash’ which in the event of Fed tightening could fall to around $400bn, assuming that capex trends remain soft and if corporate bond issuance were to return to a more ‘typical’ $600bn per annum following a tightening of policy be the Fed.

Currently, stock buy-backs are costing the corporate sector roughly $500bn per annum, dividends around $300bn and share option schemes $400bn. But if Fed tightening led to a halving in bond issuance, companies would only have around $100bn available to pay for buy-backs and the exercising of share options. The latter could fall on the back of lower share prices, and without buy-backs lower share prices might well be achieved but this would not be an objective of the Fed.

The conclusions that we can draw are that despite lacklustre GDP growth this year, there is a high probability that the Fed will feel that it needs to continue tapering, but that there is little danger that they will actually raise interest rates until nominal GDP growth accelerates appreciably. Nevertheless, rising demand pressures and weak trend growth rates will likely leave the Fed with a ‘quantity’ tightening bias. While such a bias may pose no particular threat to corporate solvency, despite the bond issuance mania of recent years, any form of tightening (via quantity or even price) that leads to a slowdown in corporate bond net issuance will have a very marked and possibly quite painful impact on asset markets. Fed tightening could both change the supply and demand balance in the fixed income markets directly and lead investors to reconsider the idea of buying long duration low nominal yield corporate debt. This could then lead to an unraveling of the market’s enthusiasm for higher-geared equity markets. There are signs that the Fed is finally tapering quite aggressively and US liquidity is suffering, but markets are calm. Should there be any sign that the corporate bond markets are struggling, this should be taken as overall cause for concern over risk asset markets.

Share

You may also like...

  • James Bevan: The deflation picture James Bevan: The deflation picture 19 Jan, 2015
  • Euroland next steps Euroland next steps 6 Dec, 2011
  • The problem for Spain, part 3 The problem for Spain, part 3 25 Jul, 2012
  • Mr Carney’s likely to support low yields but 10yr gilts are at risk Mr Carney’s likely to support low yields but 10yr gilts are at risk 11 Feb, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 3 days ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 4 days ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 4 days ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 4 days ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 5 days ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 5 days ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 5 days ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 6 days ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 6 days ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 6 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 1 month ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 1 month ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

    Room151 1 month ago

    2021: Better income outcomes?: Sponsored article: Investors should be mindful of structural challenges posed to income generation as a result of rapid thematic change. Jon Bell looks at the prospects for the coming year.[...] dlvr.it/RndRsw pic.twitter.com/TxVk8aXkMq

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Pickles counter fraud funding, single investment pot, Miliband pledge, Housing slowdown impact…
  • Next story Q&A with Nigel Kennedy

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK