• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO

    August 18, 2022

  • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system

    August 18, 2022

  • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant

    August 17, 2022

  • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’

    August 16, 2022

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Will the bankers’ bonus clawback work?

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in James Bevan
  • — 5 Aug, 2014

jb-banner-grey

It’s quite right that the rewards that employees receive over and above basic remuneration should be linked to the success of their companies – and it’s clear that over shorter term periods it’s often hard to discern whether what is apparently good news is really what it seems to be. Thus results can be mis-focused or simply tell part of the story, as with the sale of Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) contracts that generated short-term benefits for the banks but as we know ended up with huge bills for compensation.
There’s also the interesting problem that risk-taking doesn’t always show up immediately, and the global finance community are clearly still building risks. For example in the US, as a result of the easy issuance conditions in the corporate bond markets, there is a glut of potential auto loan financing available and the terms of this credit seem to be remarkably easy. Thus car loans are now available for up to six years despite the reality that new cars are virtually guaranteed to depreciate in value rather than appreciate and six years is a long time to lend against a car. In a similar vein it’s interesting that the average duration of a US corporate bond at issue today is around 13 years but the average duration of an employee or director share option is between 30 and 60 months, with a maximum of around 10 years.
As a connected point, according to enlight research, while the average tenure of a US non-executive board member has increased towards is effective legal maximum of 9 years, the turnover of executive directors and in particular CEOs has increased significantly with the result that their average tenure is likely to be less than 5 years. These are important factors because at present, the US corporate sector may be issuing as much as $1500bn of long term bonds, and according to the latest flow of funds reports, the proceeds are going to finance share option schemes, dividends, stock buy-backs and M&A. However, it is clear that the people that are taking the decisions on these ever expanding and share price boosting distributions to equity holders (including themselves) are extremely unlikely to be in place when the debt that they issue now matures. In fact many will be explicitly prohibited from being in place. Counter-cultural it may be, but short board terms and tenure may be a contributory factor behind the under-investment and preference for financial engineering presently favoured by many companies.
With specific focus on the UK, although past bonuses can be clawed back even if spent, this will not apply retrospectively – with the rules only coming into effect from 2015 and not being applied to past problems. This is consistent with lawyers’ views on contracts and obligations but is a pity in that we can reasonably expect that there will be more problems emerging and no recourse to the bonuses paid despite the expectation that such bonuses should not have been awarded.
We can also note that the rule will only apply if there “is evidence of employee misbehaviour or material error”. This means that if a banker acts in good faith, there won’t be a claw back even if the decisions taken turn out to be poor.
More generally, the banks do now appear to “get the point” of what the government demands (not the case previously under Diamond/Cable spats) and we may suspect that the new rules will not involve too many future examples. We can all agree that the general effect of curbing reckless behaviour is sound and should be a useful step in curbing banker excess.
There is a risk that banks now become overly risk averse and lose international competiveness. But these risks should be manageable – and the clawback rules do close down one of the extraordinary eyesores that has contributed to the erosion of trust in banking and finance generally. So a step in the right direction, but perhaps a little timid and we should expect more measures in due course.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO
    • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system
    • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant
    • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’
    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 9 hours ago

    Liverpool faces further government intervention as commissioners find ‘whole-council failure’: The levelling up secretary has announced that he is “minded to” expand intervention at Liverpool City Council by transferring the authority’s financial… dlvr.it/SWvgGc pic.twitter.com/cB7YeHZ9lE

    Room151 1 day ago

    Recovery position: withholding tax and the LGPS: Partner Content: Paul Sprenger from WTax talks to Room151 about how Local Government Pension Scheme funds could be missing out on millions of pounds of withholding tax recovery opportunities.… dlvr.it/SWsTfQ pic.twitter.com/z6aVMcaqHe

    Room151 2 days ago

    Treasurer societies favour permanent extension to IFRS 9 statutory override: Two treasurer society presidents have indicated their preference for the current five-year IFRS 9 statutory override to be made permanent following the government’s latest… dlvr.it/SWr3G4 pic.twitter.com/MGf9M5zC8Q

    Room151 3 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. A report by Dev Gopal, director of finance, revenues[...] dlvr.it/SWmynD pic.twitter.com/ETDd7sQA48

    Room151 3 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. room151.co.uk/funding/luton-… pic.twitter.com/XvyTZckW6m

    Room151 1 week ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 week ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Housing associations increasingly seek alternative lenders
  • Next story LGPS consultation – and a whiff of camel

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares