• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

All change again at the PWLB

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Recent Posts
  • — 23 Mar, 2012

We learned in the budget this week that the Public Works Loan Board will be changing the interest rate at which it lends to local authorities again this year. Not content with having tinkered with new loan and/or repayment rates in November 2007, April 2010, October 2010, and (for one day only) on Monday of next week, another change has been announced to take effect from an as yet unknown date in the coming financial year.

In return for receiving three-year forecasts of local authorities’ borrowing requirements, the PWLB will give a 0.20% discount on new loans that fall within the forecasted amount. Loans will still be available for sums in excess of the forecast, or if no forecasts are provided, but they will be at the normal rates.
The Treasury has termed this discounted rate the “certainty rate”. It gives no certainty to local authorities though, as rates will still change twice a day based on underlying gilt yields, i.e. the cost of central government borrowing. But the hope is that Treasury and the Office of Budget Responsibility will get better information from councils to build into their forecasts of public spending and the national debt. Improved data collection from central government departments and the NHS has led to local government spending often being mentioned as the reasons behind revisions to national economic data.

Whitehall is also a little worried about plans by several local authorities to issue capital market bonds instead of borrowing from the PWLB. Raising the margin between gilt yields and PWLB rates in October 2010 from 0.15% to 1.0% was expected at that time to raise an additional £1 billion for the Exchequer in the next three years. But with five new local authorities getting credit ratings in recent months, and a number of new LOBO loans having been borrowed last year, the government doesn’t want to lose any more interest income.

The new margin for councils that play ball will therefore be 0.80% above gilt yields. It is probably no coincidence that this is exactly the level at which the Greater London Authority issued a £600 million bond last year. And under the strange method that central government sets its budgets, reducing the PWLB rate is also expected to raise an additional sum for the Exchequer, although just £45 million this time.

I’m rather doubtful that Treasury will get the certainty it is looking for though. Since loans borrowed above the forecast level will be more expensive, there will be an incentive for local authorities to over-forecast their borrowing needs. Coupled with the long standing tendency for capital programme managers to over-forecast and under-spend anyway, an aggregated over-enthusiastic forecast could conceivably worry ministers enough to consider the use of their reserve powers to limit local authority borrowing. Some caution in setting your forecast is therefore advised!

There is also much uncertainty over when the “certainty rate” will be implemented. PWLB will take time to change its computer systems, while HMT, CLG, CIPFA and LGA will debate the exact nature of the information to be requested from local authorities. Councils thinking of deferring their borrowing decisions until after the discounted rate is available might therefore want to think again. In six months time, underlying gilt yields could easily have risen more than the 0.20% they are expecting to save.

David Green is the Head of Sterling Consultancy Services, a provider of treasury management advice to local authorities and other not for profit organisations. This is the writer’s personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice. It should not be relied upon when making investment decisions.

Share

You may also like...

  • Impact Awards: Shortlist revealed 2nd Jun, 2021
  • Room151’s 10th Anniversary: A treasury decade that saw borrowing double and investments transformed 25th Nov, 2021
  • LGPS annual reports: there must be a better way 10th Feb, 2022
  • Cash flow forecasting key to treasurers 25th May, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Never mind the Budget, it’s HRA-Friday
  • Next story False dawn or well-founded optimism?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares