• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

How the Right to Buy undermines estate regeneration

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Blogs · Recent Posts
  • — 21 May, 2013

 

Agent 151 is a senior local authority finance director and S151 officer writing exclusively for Room151. 

My Housing director is busy pulling out his hair.  Faced with the almost impossible residual task of sorting out the worst estates, he has very sensibly decided that the best thing to do is knock them all down and start again. And quite right too!

Through clever, modern design it is possible to build a mixed ownership development that intensifies land use, removes a variety of social problems, and creates what is essentially a nice place to live.  And now that the capital funding arrangements have changed, we can use the headroom in the HRA to fund all of this.  All good so far.  The fly in the ointment is Right to Buy.

Since 1980 over two million people have taken up the offer to purchase their home from the state at a knock-down price.  It has been suggested that the Right to Buy, introduced by Margaret Thatcher’s government in the 1980s, was a policy designed to win votes by playing to the feudal ambition of every British householder to own their own home.   Whether this ambition ever existed before the policy did is a point for debate.  In many countries in Europe and elsewhere in the world there is a completely different model of ownership in which being a tenant is the norm and landlords are regarded as businessmen.   My lovely old Dad, a Londoner, never owned a house in his life and never wanted to.  Whatever the truth of it, one thing that cannot be disputed is that the rational British council tenant responded to the policy with alacrity wherever there was a tempting capital gain to be made.  Indeed, town halls up and down the country were struggling to keep up with the traffic in the 1980s and early 1990s.  Volumes slumped when discounts were reduced and in any case all of the best properties went rather quickly.  Councils have been left with the properties that are so awful they can’t be sold and estates peppered with properties snapped up by buy-to-let landlords.

In the interests of balance, I should say that communities in which owner-occupiers, private tenants and council tenants live cheek-by-jowl are regarded by many as an improvement upon council ‘ghettos’.  The personal wealth generated by the Right to Buy has possibly contributed to driving economic growth in a way that public spending in other forms may not have been able to achieve.   However, disposing of a property on a lease did not relieve councils of their responsibilities as a landlord, and this created an administrative headache and a mountain of debt to collect as service charges and repairs costs were disputed and left unpaid.  Buy-to-let landlords taking on ex-council properties have driven up the benefits bill.  Worse still, and I promise you we are now getting close to my point, the homes lost to the public sector were never replaced, and this has contributed to the present housing crisis.

In April 2012 the government re-invigorated the Right to Buy by introducing new incentives.  Since then tenants have been eligible for up to £75,000 off the value of their property, and this represents a quadrupling of the discount in many areas.  In the recent budget the government decided to increase that figure to £100,000 in London, and to introduce some additional measures to warm things up: a pledge to simplify the Right to Buy application process, lowering the eligibility criteria so tenants can apply to buy their homes after 3 years instead of 5, introducing a £3.5 billion Help to Buy equity loan scheme, and a Help To Buy mortgage guarantee scheme.  Presumably the motivation for this move is both ideological and based on a belief that it will stimulate short term growth, helping to kick-start the economy.  Anyway, the re-invigoration plans have had the desired effect: DCLG has just tweeted that over the past year nearly 6,000 people have taken up the Right to Buy, more than double the previous year.  But the renaissance of Right to Buy is causing some councils a real headache.

So what is my Housing director losing hair over?  Let’s have a look at how the regeneration of council housing estates might work under the new system.   You temporarily re-house your tenants while you knock down the old no-go-area estate.  Put up brand new, modern council housing side by side with other tenure types, including some new private sector homes built for sale or part ownership schemes.  Move your tenants back in.  And then watch these lovely council properties fly out of the door as the Right to Buy applications flood in, scooping your tenant a hefty discount and losing you a lot of your council housing capacity.

So you lose a few homes, but you do get a capital receipt for them, right?  I’m afraid the answer to this is complicated, so pay attention.   Some of the receipt goes to cover the council’s costs.  This consists of an amount to cover the housing debt that would have been supported by the income from the properties sold, an amount for transaction and administration costs, and an amount which compensates councils for giving a bigger discount under the new rules.  Got that?  Then the council must pay the government its share of the money.  This is an amount equal to the capital receipt which the Treasury would have expected from the Right to Buy sales prior to the new scheme.   Once these costs are deducted, the remaining receipt (the ‘net receipt’) is available to fund replacement affordable rented homes.  I told you it was complicated.

There’s more.  If you want to retain the net receipt you need to enter into an agreement with CLG that commits you to use it on providing affordable rented homes.  Fair enough, you may say, but you will also be agreeing that the receipts will not constitute more than 30% of your investment in those homes.  If any of the receipts have not been used after three years they have to be returned to the government with interest.

In practice local authorities will be scuppered by the requirement that receipts cover only 30% of replacement costs and by the lack of availability of other sources of funding as headroom in the HRA erodes.  Not to mention that in some parts of the country housing directors will be left wondering exactly where they might find some land to build replacement homes upon.

So now I have a Housing director who wants to build homes outside of the HRA.  And I don’t blame him!  We are looking at options together while he still has some hair left.

Share

You may also like...

  • The euro, brinkmanship and market distress The euro, brinkmanship and market distress 24 Nov, 2011
  • Preparing the accounts Preparing the accounts 15 Apr, 2014
  • ESG presents LGPS with investment innovation opportunities 3 Mar, 2021
  • Dan Bates: An extra £1.6bn is welcome but boosting council resilience will need more 22 Apr, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 11 hours ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 14 hours ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 1 day ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 1 day ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 1 day ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 1 day ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 2 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 2 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 1 week ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Uncertainty for global investors
  • Next story Where’s UK economic growth going to come from?

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.