• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

How the Right to Buy undermines estate regeneration

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Blogs · Recent Posts
  • — 21 May, 2013

 

Agent 151 is a senior local authority finance director and S151 officer writing exclusively for Room151. 

My Housing director is busy pulling out his hair.  Faced with the almost impossible residual task of sorting out the worst estates, he has very sensibly decided that the best thing to do is knock them all down and start again. And quite right too!

Through clever, modern design it is possible to build a mixed ownership development that intensifies land use, removes a variety of social problems, and creates what is essentially a nice place to live.  And now that the capital funding arrangements have changed, we can use the headroom in the HRA to fund all of this.  All good so far.  The fly in the ointment is Right to Buy.

Since 1980 over two million people have taken up the offer to purchase their home from the state at a knock-down price.  It has been suggested that the Right to Buy, introduced by Margaret Thatcher’s government in the 1980s, was a policy designed to win votes by playing to the feudal ambition of every British householder to own their own home.   Whether this ambition ever existed before the policy did is a point for debate.  In many countries in Europe and elsewhere in the world there is a completely different model of ownership in which being a tenant is the norm and landlords are regarded as businessmen.   My lovely old Dad, a Londoner, never owned a house in his life and never wanted to.  Whatever the truth of it, one thing that cannot be disputed is that the rational British council tenant responded to the policy with alacrity wherever there was a tempting capital gain to be made.  Indeed, town halls up and down the country were struggling to keep up with the traffic in the 1980s and early 1990s.  Volumes slumped when discounts were reduced and in any case all of the best properties went rather quickly.  Councils have been left with the properties that are so awful they can’t be sold and estates peppered with properties snapped up by buy-to-let landlords.

In the interests of balance, I should say that communities in which owner-occupiers, private tenants and council tenants live cheek-by-jowl are regarded by many as an improvement upon council ‘ghettos’.  The personal wealth generated by the Right to Buy has possibly contributed to driving economic growth in a way that public spending in other forms may not have been able to achieve.   However, disposing of a property on a lease did not relieve councils of their responsibilities as a landlord, and this created an administrative headache and a mountain of debt to collect as service charges and repairs costs were disputed and left unpaid.  Buy-to-let landlords taking on ex-council properties have driven up the benefits bill.  Worse still, and I promise you we are now getting close to my point, the homes lost to the public sector were never replaced, and this has contributed to the present housing crisis.

In April 2012 the government re-invigorated the Right to Buy by introducing new incentives.  Since then tenants have been eligible for up to £75,000 off the value of their property, and this represents a quadrupling of the discount in many areas.  In the recent budget the government decided to increase that figure to £100,000 in London, and to introduce some additional measures to warm things up: a pledge to simplify the Right to Buy application process, lowering the eligibility criteria so tenants can apply to buy their homes after 3 years instead of 5, introducing a £3.5 billion Help to Buy equity loan scheme, and a Help To Buy mortgage guarantee scheme.  Presumably the motivation for this move is both ideological and based on a belief that it will stimulate short term growth, helping to kick-start the economy.  Anyway, the re-invigoration plans have had the desired effect: DCLG has just tweeted that over the past year nearly 6,000 people have taken up the Right to Buy, more than double the previous year.  But the renaissance of Right to Buy is causing some councils a real headache.

So what is my Housing director losing hair over?  Let’s have a look at how the regeneration of council housing estates might work under the new system.   You temporarily re-house your tenants while you knock down the old no-go-area estate.  Put up brand new, modern council housing side by side with other tenure types, including some new private sector homes built for sale or part ownership schemes.  Move your tenants back in.  And then watch these lovely council properties fly out of the door as the Right to Buy applications flood in, scooping your tenant a hefty discount and losing you a lot of your council housing capacity.

So you lose a few homes, but you do get a capital receipt for them, right?  I’m afraid the answer to this is complicated, so pay attention.   Some of the receipt goes to cover the council’s costs.  This consists of an amount to cover the housing debt that would have been supported by the income from the properties sold, an amount for transaction and administration costs, and an amount which compensates councils for giving a bigger discount under the new rules.  Got that?  Then the council must pay the government its share of the money.  This is an amount equal to the capital receipt which the Treasury would have expected from the Right to Buy sales prior to the new scheme.   Once these costs are deducted, the remaining receipt (the ‘net receipt’) is available to fund replacement affordable rented homes.  I told you it was complicated.

There’s more.  If you want to retain the net receipt you need to enter into an agreement with CLG that commits you to use it on providing affordable rented homes.  Fair enough, you may say, but you will also be agreeing that the receipts will not constitute more than 30% of your investment in those homes.  If any of the receipts have not been used after three years they have to be returned to the government with interest.

In practice local authorities will be scuppered by the requirement that receipts cover only 30% of replacement costs and by the lack of availability of other sources of funding as headroom in the HRA erodes.  Not to mention that in some parts of the country housing directors will be left wondering exactly where they might find some land to build replacement homes upon.

So now I have a Housing director who wants to build homes outside of the HRA.  And I don’t blame him!  We are looking at options together while he still has some hair left.

Share

You may also like...

  • Economic and market briefing: GDP Releases Economic and market briefing: GDP Releases 22 Nov, 2012
  • The LTRO in perspective The LTRO in perspective 2 Mar, 2012
  • Update pending Update pending 23 May, 2012
  • To boldly go… To boldly go… 1 Jul, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’: As Room151’s FDs’ Summit conference explores local government’s investment in commercial property MPs once again lable it a “significant risk to government”. Once again MPs… dlvr.it/Rr7lZx pic.twitter.com/jPvcZjDAS4

    Room151 2 days ago

    Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine: Sponsored article: Salman Ahmed argues monetary policy, a global vaccine rollout and fiscal stimulus are likely to put “upward pressure” on bond yields. Much like the latter half of 2020,[...] dlvr.it/Rr60nt pic.twitter.com/qsymBWmKmV

    Room151 3 days ago

    ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom: Recent speculation that the UK may be heading toward negative interest rates prompts questions for treasury officers managing local authority funds at LATIF. Speculation is rife that the UK… dlvr.it/Rr3Mrj pic.twitter.com/wtxYAB20PO

    Room151 5 days ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 1 week ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 1 week ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Uncertainty for global investors
  • Next story Where’s UK economic growth going to come from?

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK