• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • LGA: councils facing service and job cuts due to National Living Wage increase

    June 21, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Localism & Derivatives

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green · Recent Posts
  • — 18 Nov, 2011

You may not have noticed, but there was a vaguely regal air to treasury management this week.  On Tuesday afternoon, HM the Queen gave her Royal Assent to the Localism Bill, while on Wednesday morning Mr King reminded us of the stately pace of growth of the UK economy in the Bank of England’s quarterly inflation report.

There are a princely 241 sections to the newly renamed Localism Act 2011, but its crowning glory is its initial phrase: “A local authority has power to do anything that individuals generally may do.”  Subsequent sections clarify that this general power of competence doesn’t extend to anything that is already prohibited by legislation, but it does allow any action that was previously deemed ultra vires due to the absence of a specific enabling power.

So, while borrowing in a foreign currency without consent or securing loans on Council houses will remain illegal, local authorities should now be able to enter into financial derivatives, pool investments with their neighbours and cross-guarantee each other’s debts without fear of incurring the monitoring officer’s wrath.

Derivatives are causing the most heat at the moment, partly due to section 168 of the same Act enabling CLG to force over 100 housing authorities to borrow a combined £14bn next March under the reform of housing finance.  But local authorities have been using embedded derivatives for years – callable deposits, variable rates with collars and LOBO loans all involved the council taking on additional risk by selling options to the bank in return for a higher investment return or a lower cost of debt.

CIPFA’s latest edition of the Treasury Management Code of Practice, another arrival on treasury managers’ desks this week, recommends that public bodies only use standalone financial derivatives for reducing risk.  Examples would include using a forward rate agreement or an interest rate swap to fix the rate of future investment income without taking on the credit risk of locking into lending to a particular counterparty for a number of years.  This guidance also precludes councils from selling (or writing) options, but would allow an authority stuck with a uncomfortably high level of LOBO debt to purchase swaptions and therefore have the right to fix the rate at which it can replace any recalled loans.

Used sensibly, derivatives can add real value to a local authority’s treasury performance.  But memories of Hammersmith & Fulham in the late 1980s and ongoing controversies in the City of Milan and Jefferson County, Alabama will encourage authorities to adopt a cautious approach to this new freedom.

David Green is the Head of Sterling Consultancy Services, a provider of treasury management advice to local authorities and other not for profit organisations.  This is the writer’s personal opinion and does not constitute legal or investment advice.  It should not be relied upon when making investment decisions.

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS could back an investment Big Bang ‘so long as the price is right’ 7th Sep, 2021
  • Why build to rent has remained resilient despite Covid-19 28th Apr, 2021
  • PWLB changes and local authority creditworthiness 27th Jan, 2021
  • Levelling up and the LGPS 16th Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • LGA: councils facing service and job cuts due to National Living Wage increase
    • London boroughs facing £400m extra pressure on budgets due to inflation
    • ICAEW: ‘ARGA needs more powers over local authority financial reporting’
    • Lambeth chief exec to join public sector consultancy
    • Councils given £15.5m funding to help implement social care reforms
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 5 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 6 days ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 6 days ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’:The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. @London_CIV room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: Watford Borough Council & Three Rivers District Council, various roles:       Technical Accountant Career Grade: We are looking for a motivated team player to join our Finance Department. The post holder will gain experience across these… dlvr.it/SSWN8f

    Room151 1 week ago

    Inflation and the LGPS: Local government pension payments will rise significantly next year based on the inflation rate this September. William Bourne discusses whether funds should be looking for some protection by turning to[...] dlvr.it/SSVK9x pic.twitter.com/7zH9OkRo1d

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Wandsworth & Birmingham’s triple-A tips
  • Next story Death by Deleverage

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares