• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Looking for a new England

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Recent Posts
  • — 18 Nov, 2014

In the aftermath of the Scottish ‘No’ vote it is hard to predict how things will settle down. Politicians, excited by the record numbers that cast their ballot, see it as an endorsement of the democratic process and, by extension, a vote for politicians in general. You can still see the warm glow in their cheeks when the matter comes up.

The referendum’s wave of energy is being directed into sorting out the question of what happens now; something for which all parties seem to have been spectacularly unprepared.
Amid the excitement hasty promises were made, and the Prime Minister, honourably, is determined that these will be honoured. No one knows whether the result would have been the same if promises had not been made, but if the ‘No’ margin had been a bit wider one could imagine certain senior English figures in a post-referendum frenzy of kicking themselves.

We in local government, however, must be very grateful that the promises were made because more devolution to Scotland by implication means more devolution of power in England, and that is something we have argued would be beneficial for a long time.
The implications for England came as a surprise to the government, and to almost everyone else. In his post-election speech David Cameron said, “…a new and fair settlement for Scotland should be accompanied by a new and fair settlement that applies to all parts of the United Kingdom”. He then revealed he hadn’t the faintest idea what this meant and that he had asked William Hague and a Cabinet committee to look into it. This was the signal for all and sundry to fall over themselves to get in on the act, contributing an abundance of ideas, most of which have been entirely parochial. In short, it has descended into a bun fight.

The first issue is the so-called West Lothian question: why are Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs allowed to vote on matters concerning only England when power is devolved to regional assemblies in those areas? With more powers going to Scotland, the question is thrown into stark relief: in a more federal system, who is going to govern England? Hence the chorus of voices yelling me, me, me!
We don’t want a separate English assembly – another layer of government and bureaucracy brings on the shuddering horrors in most of us. Fortunately, whilst this is the most logical solution it is also the least likely: it is too expensive, too elaborate, and way too threatening to Whitehall. No, I believe we can pronounce that one dead and read aloud a suitable poem while we bury it in an old cereal box at the end of the garden with the other short-lived pets.

Only English MPs voting on issues that affect only England is the evens favourite, only recently endorsed by a House of Commons commission. However, this idea is flawed, because it could potentially leave the country in an ungovernable position: a Labour government with a majority because of support in Scotland could be left unable to win any votes on English issues. Eat up those Rice Krispies kids; we’re gonna need another box!

The only viable solution is one that will be anathema to Whitehall power-hoarders: devolution to local government. And why not? Local government is demonstrably the most efficient part of the public sector. Cut after cut has, incredibly, been converted to higher satisfaction with services. Give it the Health Service to manage and it will deliver true integration of local health-related services, better outcomes, and massive efficiency savings. More power to raise taxes locally will deliver faster economic growth through better targeted employment incentives, improved investment in local infrastructure, and more housing.

The Prime Minister considers it “…important we have wider civic engagement about how to improve governance in our United Kingdom, including how to empower our great cities”. I would argue that the existing structures can take the load: there is no need to insist upon elected mayors or create new city regions, because we already have a system that has been stress tested to the extreme and has passed the test. Let’s sort out the Barnett formula so that funding is fair throughout the UK and get on with devolving power to councils.

Share

You may also like...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Dom Piper: Deconstructing a money market fund
  • Next story DCLG understanding of cuts impact questioned

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares