• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

MMF investors bank on liquidity

0
  • by Jo Tura
  • in Recent Posts · Treasury
  • — 22 Nov, 2012

The second of a two part series following plans to change money market fund regulation. 

Recommendations issued by the International Organisation of Securities Commissions last month are attempting to address the fear that MMFs are systemically important, and could be subject to runs in times of financial market turmoil.

Together with low yields and a reduction in viable counterparties, the possible new swathe of regulations set to cover money market funds is just the latest in a long line of worries for the industry.

Of the 2008 financial crisis IOSCO noted recently: “Although money market funds, which provide a significant source of credit and liquidity, did not cause the crisis, their performance during the 2007-8 financial turmoil highlighted their potential to spread or even amplify a crisis.”

Money market funds are being defined as ‘shadow banking’ products, an assertion disputed, in general, by the fund management industry, which claims MMFs are investment products.

Arlingclose senior client director Andrew Larkin thinks differently. “Our clients use them as a liquidity product, not for investment. They use them instead of call accounts.”

And therein lies the main beef that treasurers have with a potential move to a variable, or floating net asset value. If £1 today is worth 99p tomorrow a money market fund may no longer have a valid use as a liquidity product.

The issue is caught up in a number of other worries for treasurers. A reduction in the number of attractive counterparties means that less banks are available for depositing funds. A high risk environment and high profile losses such as those in the Iceland case make general collective fund investment an unlikely home for treasury funds. Holding MMFs themselves is potentially more subject to duplication of counterparties if more than one is held, as they have reduced holdings down to mainly highly-rated core European paper.

Notable proposals from IOSCO were:

• holding back shareholders funds for a period after withdrawal

• increasing capital requirements for MMF groups

• setting up an insurance fund

• changing CNAV to partial VNAV

Treasury consultants have been quick to issue guidance. It is important for treasurers to note that a final position on the recommendations is unlikely to be reached until late 2013, said Dan Willson, assistant director at Sector. A grandfathering period for funds to alter their positions may not be completed until 2014.

Clients’ greatest fear is that of the unknown, added Willson. “Our biggest role is about education,” he noted, “helping clients to understand the risks. If you have an AAA-rated money market fund that is toward the bottom of the risk scale. These funds are not there to push the envelope, they are looking for strong security and high liquidity and the yield is a by-product of that.”

Arlingclose is also keeping a watching brief. “It is probable that most, if not all, of the solutions would cause an increase in the funds’ cost base, the corollary of this being a reduction in yield for investors,” explained Larkin. “The challenge for both the industry and regulators is forming a plan that keeps investors content that the funds will be able to maintain their objectives of security, liquidity and yield. Whilst investors may be able to stomach lower returns, many may shy away if the product’s liquidity characteristics are compromised.”

Share

You may also like...

  • Complexity and cost the barriers to Libor loss recovery Complexity and cost the barriers to Libor loss recovery 12 Sep, 2013
  • Senior council officers voice doubts over retail investment exposure Senior council officers voice doubts over retail investment exposure 21 Mar, 2019
  • Danny Mather: How Warrington council invested in a brand new bank Danny Mather: How Warrington council invested in a brand new bank 12 Apr, 2017
  • Printing money: not as straightforward as it sounds Printing money: not as straightforward as it sounds 24 Jan, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 21 hours ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 2 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 2 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling: Day traders coordinating their efforts through the social media platform Reddit have not only boosted the stock of US GameStop, but also badly hurt hedge funds engaged in huge bets[...] dlvr.it/RsGdVV pic.twitter.com/NTMC3j6J2u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Room151 panel backs unitary councils and devolution: Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to local government, according to Sir Bob Kerslake, chair of the Peabody Trust, but “ …we need to move to unitary government and[...] dlvr.it/RsFPNv pic.twitter.com/lT4eCi0TmV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Maximum business rates levy 50p in the pound
  • Next story Mr Carney at the Bank of England

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.