• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGPS infrastructure partnership invests £1.8bn in renewables

    December 12, 2019

  • Brunel appoints global high alpha managers

    December 11, 2019

  • City of London completes £250m debt deal

    December 11, 2019

  • Mystery bidder appointed on £250m waste contract

    December 11, 2019

  • Investors withdraw from property fund

    December 11, 2019

  • Highland councillors back tourist tax

    December 11, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Mr Bernanke’s position in perspective

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan · Recent Posts
  • — 31 Jan, 2012

In early 2002, then Fed Chairman Greenspan delivered a robust ‘Humphrey Hawkins’ address that was hugely supportive of equities by promising rapid economic growth for the economy but, in so doing he essentially sacrificed the bond markets. As it turned out, the economy was already weakening at that time (Greenspan had simply been wrong in his assessment of conditions) but the subsequent weakness in bond prices (rise in yields) caused by the comments can only have undermined the real sectors, with the result that by 2003, deflation fears had returned to the global economy.

When Mr Greenspan, and Mr Bernanke, who was then in effect his understudy, realised what had happened, their response to the deflations scare in early 2003 was to use direct money market operations to control the short end of the curve, the promise of long periods of low rates to tether the middle of the curve, and talk of low long term inflation expectations to hold down long term rates.

There are at least two schools of thought as to why the Fed has launched a new ‘extraordinary measures’ monetary campaign now. First, there is the view that the Fed want to achieve a rise in inflation (despite the fact that he also announced a 2% inflation target at the same time) that erodes the real value of the nation’s private and public sector debt burdens over time, albeit at the expense of savers, and that holding bond yields down as inflation rises (so real yields are negative) is part of delivering recovery.

A second view is that Mr Bernanke wants to force other major economies into easing and that Fed rhetoric and action may usher in competitive QE in Europe, Japan and China, at least because further QE in the US should be expected to be bad for the dollar and to avoid relative currency appreciation against the dollar, other regions would need to follow Mr Bernanke’s lead.

At one level, progressive easing strategies that are global in nature are clearly required to ensure adequate systemic liquidity, but on the other hand such initiatives can create competitive devaluation cycles, which can be viewed as dangerous and ultimately self-defeating. In addition, history shows that periods of monetary instability or global inflation (were that to result) do not generate good asset market returns.

Perhaps more worryingly, in terms of risks to markets and economies, if there were to be competitive QE cycles in western developed debtor economies, it may be that Emerging Markets quickly establish capital controls, which would serve to create yet more instability.

As a backcloth to the central bank policy initiatives, it is clear that most policymakers are distinctly nervous if not pessimistic, particularly outside the core of Europe. The gossip is that in private meetings, many describe the Euro project as doomed and most expect a global recession of some form – possibly quite severe – before too long. The IMF’s forecasts have been consistent with this notion and although it is fashionable to dismiss these people as being inaccurate historically, it is notable that their forecasting errors have usually been on the too optimistic side (for political reasons). If they still have this bias, then we can assume that in reality they are really quite pessimistic at present, and we are seeing policy easing, albeit gradual in Asia and Australia and we have the FRB and even the BoE joining in. However reluctantly and unquantifiable, the ECB has been dragged in this direction.

Of course, the Central Banks may be wrong. Mr Draghi may have saved the world and global production trends may be picking up on a sustained basis. If this is so, the facts will have changed and we should expect Central Banks to change their policies.

It is for this reason that we believe that the current valuation/liquidity inspired rally in risk asset markets faces two quite opposing threats. Either the world economy is in a much worse state than the consensus realises (i.e. the Central Banks are right but the Investment Bank economics departments are wrong) with the result that earnings forecasts will need to be savagely reduced. Alternatively, the Central Banks are wrong and QE3 will not need to occur. If the latter is true, we can expect pressure on bond yields and then markets will quickly lose their valuation support.

Against this backcloth, we anticipate that long term equity investors should be focused on stocks supported by strong balance sheets, robust free cash flows and priced to offer high and rising dividend flows.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Looking ahead: Investment market prospects for 2019 21 Jan, 2019
  • Andrew Lovegrove: Evolving and resourcing our treasury strategy 11 Jul, 2016
  • Euroland deposits and loans, part 2 Euroland deposits and loans, part 2 12 Jan, 2012
  • Here today, gone tomorrow 28 Nov, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Court rejects NHS trusts’ claim for millions in business rates relief: A judge yesterday threw out a claim by 17 NHS trusts that they are charities and should receive millions of pounds of business rates relief. Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation[...] dlvr.it/RL8F7D pic.twitter.com/fxt6Sor3Q7

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Authorities turn away from PWLB in favour of borrowing from peers: Councils borrowed just £80m through the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) during the first full month since the Treasury’s rate rise, a mere 4% of August’s total. Just two authorities[...] dlvr.it/RL8F57 pic.twitter.com/zIOf1KlNpc

    Room 151 4 days ago

    County introduces new rules after £9.1m funds gaffe: A report to Hertfordshire’s most recent audit committee meeting said the “treasury control failure” had come to light in August, one day after the multi-million-pound redemption was not received.… dlvr.it/RL5DP0 pic.twitter.com/6LvY71zUew

    Room 151 4 days ago

    News just in - #WorkingtonWoman is believed to represent roughly half the electorate in Workington.

    Room 151 5 days ago

    LGPS urged to put the ‘social’ back into ESG: LGPS committee members and managers have been asked to elevate the importance of the “S” in ESG (environmental, social and governance) to help protect workers’ rights as the world confronts[...] dlvr.it/RL1c9p pic.twitter.com/xv590d3qm8

    Room 151 5 days ago

    Room 151’s top 10 news stories of 2019 room151.co.uk/treasury/room-… #localgov

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Room 151’s top news stories of 2019: As an eventful year for local authority treasurers draws to a close, Room 151 takes a look at the top 10 stories from the sector during 2019. 10. Spending watchdog[...] dlvr.it/RKy49q

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Council files £130m claim against PFI contractor for post-Grenfell estate costs: London Borough of Camden is suing a former PFI partner and its main subcontractors for £130m for costs relating to the evacuation of one of its housing estates the week[...] dlvr.it/RKkR8C pic.twitter.com/zIfQcikMjq

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Review highlights ongoing financial management issues at Northamptonshire: Northamptonshire County Council’s new section 151 officer should draw up plans to repatriate powers from government commissioners amid ongoing problems with financial management,… dlvr.it/RKjLkN pic.twitter.com/tQIxMDawQV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Q&A with the Co-op: LA banking, Vickers & PFI
  • Next story LTRO buys breathing room for Euroland

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK