• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Punching back

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Funding · Recent Posts
  • — 31 Dec, 2012

Agent 151 is a senior local authority finance director and S151 officer. The agent writes exclusively for Room151 and is licensed to speak candidly.

If you take a pair of shears to local government funding, you might expect to see a commensurate decrease in the scale or scope of local government services, or some compensating tax increases.  In the event, neither of these things has happened to the degree that might reasonably have been expected.

Indeed, as remarked by the Minister for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles MP, in his local government finance settlement oral statement: “Local government has shown great skill in reducing its budgets. Committed local authorities have protected front line services. Little wonder then that at a time of retrenchment satisfaction in council services has gone up.”

The apparent weak correlation between funding levels and service delivery has strengthened central government belief that there is more scope to cut waste, as evidenced by the somewhat patronising 50 ways to save – Examples of sensible savings in local government issued by DCLG in December.  The exhortation not to use mineral water at meetings generated a good deal of hollow laughter in local government circles, but it illustrates the view clearly held by those in central government that councils are still not taking austerity seriously.

At the same time, examples are given in the document of local authorities that have been innovating and generating new efficiencies.  To quote the LGA response to the 2013/14 settlement: “It is generally recognised that councils have managed the cuts so far by maximising efficiencies and redesigning services.”   Indeed, Councils have in fact risen to the challenge in a magnificent way, generating millions and millions of Pounds in efficiency savings by coming up with new ideas and implementing them very efficiently with a minimum of fuss.  In my own council we have saved by sharing services with neighbours, investing to save in ICT, increasing the occupancy of council buildings through introducing new ways of working, improving processes and procedures, cutting out waste… I could go on.  The list is (transparently) available on the council website.

It is interesting to contrast councils’ performance in this respect with that of central government, which has been poor.  According to Tony Travers, the director of the Greater London Group at the London School of Economics, most central government departments have yet to deliver the savings they have promised, and the latest indications are that the trend in central government departmental expenditure remains upward.  More hollow laughter.

It appears that local government is its own worst enemy, in that the reward for good performance is more cuts.  In its document Funding outlook for councils from 2010/11 to 2019/20:Preliminary modelling the LGA warned the government that “If the same pattern of cuts to the public spending is replicated in the next Spending Review, councils will not be able to deliver the existing service offer by the end of this decade”. The warning has fallen on deaf ears.  Local government may have been exempted from the 1% additional cut in 2013/14, but is back on the list in 2014/15 to take a share of an extra 2%.  We do not yet know what the Spending Review holds for local government, but would anyone bet on local government taking a smaller share than other areas of spending like health and education?

Meanwhile, the government continues with its front-foot rhetoric, aimed, it would appear, at Daily Mail readers.  Councils are wasteful.  Councils must be restrained from irresponsibly putting up council tax.  Council managers are paid too much money.  Councils are not transparent.  Once again, local government is its own worst enemy when it comes to responding to such accusations, however baseless they may be.  Conflicted by its own politics, confounded by the complexity of the funding system and its own arguments (even DCLG found it necessary to issue a Plain English Guide to the Settlement), local government’s pronouncements on the subject of funding sound like little more than whingeing.  It is time for local government to try to win the media battle and drop its fastidiousness about Daily Mail politics.  When will the LGA take off the gloves?

Share

You may also like...

  • A property fire sale triggered by Prudential Code could ‘shatter’ confidence in local economies 7th Dec, 2021
  • Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit 30th Jun, 2022
  • How to be net zero by 2030 23rd Feb, 2022
  • Waste authority to issue green bond through UKMBA 2nd Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 1 day ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story RBKC & Wandsworth feel knock-on effect of UK rating
  • Next story 2012: risk assets up, charity down

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares