• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Stephen Hughes on finance and the future for local government

1
  • by Jo Tura
  • in Interviews · Recent Posts
  • — 19 Nov, 2013

Stephen Hughes is chief executive of Birmingham City Council and was speaking here to Jo Tura for the first issue of Room151 Quarterly magazine. 

Room 151: How big a part has your finance background played in the chief exec role?

SH: Critical. It’s probably what got me the job in the first place. I came here in February 2004 and four months later the Conservative Lib Dem coalition took over from Labour here. I did a couple of things that year, one being the refinancing of the NEC debt. I did a particular piece around the accounts which saved a one-off £11m just by looking at some technical thing: I put a deminimis level on accruals. I’ve done that at each authority I’ve been in. That money was used to support the employees who lost their jobs at MG Rover in 2005.

Then, because the administration had not really thought through a full programme in advance (this was to be expected because they were two opposing parties), the first year was largely spent dealing with an overspend in social care. I’d already sorted out a similar problem at Brent, so with help I was able to get that turned round. When doing the parties’ first budget I guessed they would want to spend some money so as part of the budget preparation we found £7m to use as ‘partnership priorities’. This was a way of identifying a resource which would enable them to do the things they wanted without having to go round slashing things here there and everywhere. The consequence of all of that was we had joint discussions between the two parties to agree a budget and there was one budget for 2005/6, not two. The two parties had gone in assuming they’d devise separate budgets then bring it together. That set the tone for the rest of the administration.

In June 2005 Lin Homer, then chief executive, left to go to the Home Office and they asked me to be acting chief exec. I think that was because I had demonstrated my usefulness. So how important was finance in getting me the job? It was the whole reason. And their approach, their banner, was fiscal discipline; they wanted to focus on making better value for money. You would expect a new director of finance to find a few things like that but the core of what I was doing was the business transformation and that made the difference: the partnership with Capita, and plan to save £1bn net over 10 years and significant changes in services.

Room 151: How much money has the transformation work saved the council?

SH: The original target was £100m net of the investment, cashable savings over 10 years starting in 2006. We’re on target to achieve that but the actual saving is greater because that would translate to £100m a
year. But over the last three years we’ve saved £377m through a range of things like service redesign and reductions. We’ve had a vast increase in the productivity of staff, supported by the changes that we made. Nebulous, non-cashable savings really came home through the savings exercise that we’ve done over the last three years. So I think the total amount saved is huge. It has modernised the council and made us more capable of being flexible and changing in a way that we weren’t previously.

Room 151: As everyone is looking at West Somerset* and saying it’s too small, is it possible for a council to be too big? Is Birmingham too big?

SH: Certainly if you want to run it on a command and control model, it’s too big. You’d get clogged up with decisions right at the top because you couldn’t possibly know everything that’s going on. It’s too big if you’re going to use the heroic leader approach to service delivery, because there’s no way you can
get to meet everyone. You have to have distributed leadership and influence negotiations so it’s not the chief exec that runs the organisation – everything is the team. That’s the nature of the organisation, it’s so big that it only works as a collaborative effort.

 

Room 151: Should there be more financial autonomy for councils like yours?

SH: I’m on the record as saying we believe we’ve got much greater capability for delivering things. If you
think about how funding streams are fragmented before they get delivered at a local level, each of the central government departments have a series of programmes to achieve and when they hit the ground here they’ve gone through so many routes from Whitehall to Birmingham that there is hardly any
connectivity at all. A good example of that is schools and employment where you have three departments – Department of Education, DWP and BIS, all providing different interventions. Of course, we are doing some of it too. Our argument, and Heseltine’s, was that if you brought all that money together and gave local control, you’d get much better results. It’s not that centrally-driven programmes aren’t good, it’s that they lack the connection to other programmes in the place. With the money comes responsibility back up to government departments and Parliament. We’ve not been very good at convincing government that, first of all, we have passion for our place – we don’t want the money to be irresponsible with it, we actually care. We have to convince them to trust us more with it.

That comes back to the thing we talked about on different types of councils having different capabilities. If government looks at West Somerset* and says ‘there’s no way we can give them the responsibility for delivering all these government programmes because they haven’t got the capacity’, yes. But we’re different from West Somerset* – we have got the capacity and capability. There’s also an argument for self-sufficiency. One issue we have around the economy is the incentives are wrong. We work to create jobs and get people off the dole, but all the benefits go to DWP, Treasury or someone else.

We’re quite keen on something similar to the Manchester earn-back model, but there might be a more radical solution. Suppose the government took away all of our grant, left us with retained business rates, council tax and some percentage of locally collected VAT receipts. There would be a number of advantages. Firstly we wouldn’t have to worry about what grant we’d get next year, giving some stability.
And you’d have an inbuilt incentive, because there’s a close correlation between improvement in employment and those things, and VAT. I don’t expect anyone would do this, but I throw the thought out there because there are different models of how local government could be financed. We don’t have to be this massively grant-dependent organisation. It’s the grant dependency which creates the instability in planning ahead and the scale of savings we have to make.

Room 151: What makes a good Section 151 officer?

SH: The traditional view is of the man who never gives anything away, but I think the job is more about finding solutions to the challenges. So finance role: vital. Always has been, always will be. Being a good S151 is a balance. You have to understand and be firm about your statutory responsibilities because that’s what the 151 bit means, but if that’s all you do, you will just be seen as a blocker and people will work round you. To be at the heart of an organisation, the finance director has to be seen as
the person who will solve the problems. That’s equally true of the lawyer or the HR person but the finance man has a particular role because you can’t do anything without some money.

Room 151: The relationship with central government is the interesting one perhaps?

SH: We have really difficult decisions to make. We’re doing service reviews and all of that but it isn’t helpful when the context for the debate is trivialised. My Leader has put out his jaws of doom graph about the savings we need to make over 2010/11 through to 2017/18. When Cameron was in town opening a free school or something he was asked what he thought and he said ‘Well, you’ve only had a 0.7% reduction in your spending power.’ True. For one year. In 2015/16 we’re going to have a 15% cut in grants in one year. Then there was the bit about ‘All you need to do to solve your problems is sack the chief executive’. There’s a left wing equivalent of that where people locally think all we have to do is sack our private sector contracts. We have to get beyond the political ping-pong to a common understanding of the scale of the challenge and therefore the real policy choices that we need to make.

We know what’s going on. My Leader is saying it, Merrick Cockell is saying it, the LGA is doing its rewiring public services thing and there are Leaders from every political party saying the same. Local
government gets it, but time is short. This is a really serious situation, it’s not about batting allegations around saying who is being efficient and who isn’t. It’s beyond that discussion, the numbers are beyond
that. 2015/16 is the big crunch time and that’s 18 months away now.

* Correction: In the printed version of Issue One of Room151 Quarterly we made reference to North Somerset in the third questions of the interview, a reference which was later repeated by the interviewee. We had intended to refer to West Somerset (as corrected above in the online version of the interview). 

The article was first published in Room151 Quarterly magazine. Didn’t receive a copy? Local authority heads of finance, resources, procurement and chief execs can email subscriptions@room151.co.uk for a complimentary subscription. 

Share

You may also like...

  • Pension power: beyond net zero 4th Feb, 2022
  • Finding private sector solutions to the housing crisis 16th Mar, 2022
  • Jackie Weaver calls for more ‘hyper-localism’ to revitalise local government 9th Feb, 2022
  • How a digital revolution is upon us 7th Feb, 2022

1 Comment

  1. The Chamberlain Files says:
    2014/03/11 at 13:29

    […] Cover Images: Wton Partnership / Room 151 […]

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 1 day ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 2 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 3 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 4 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 4 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Treasurers weekly briefing #2
  • Next story Lending a hand

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares