• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Active managers still in the game

0
  • by Gavin Hinks
  • in LGPS
  • — 4 Dec, 2019

Under performance and high costs have given active management a bad press, some of it well deserved. But it appears to be on the brink of a renaissance with some LGPS managers seeing it as a force for good.

Investment officers at the Room151 LGPS Asset Allocation Forum in November revealed that despite the rise of passive managers, there is still a place for their active counterparts.

While active management has received criticism, speakers at the forum, held at the London Stock, certainly believed it could be worth a punt under the right circumstances.

Some even thought that the dominance of ESG (environmental, social and governance) factors opens up new opportunities for active managers.

Mark Mansley, chief investment officer at Brunel Pension Partnership, offered an emphatic endorsement: “We do fundamentally believe in active management as an option for investors.”

Human touch

Active fund management—the use of a “human element” (analysis, research, individual judgement) in fund management—has fallen out of favour in some circles, due to the failure of many managers to match or better index linked funds.

REGISTER for Room151’s free LGPS Quarterly Briefing

In July the Financial Times reported that $30bn had been pulled so far from US and European active funds in 2019, the highest rate for three years.

In May, Morningstar, a firm of financial analysts, reported that the volume of assets passively managed in the US now equalled that of actively managed funds, around $4.3trn.

In the UK, of the £1.2trn under management, around a third is passive, according to the Investment Association.

Passive management looks like it minimises risk and has certainly grown in favour, but there are those who see real benefits in active management.

Four

According to Mansley, there are four major reasons why active management should be reconsidered.

Firstly, despite problems with performance, evidence is available to show that certain active approaches do work.

Secondly, passive management is a “naive” approach to risk management; active can be more sophisticated.

RESEARCH: Good stewardship in action
Help Room151 identify exemplar stewards of companies, assets and charities.

Next, the old complaint about the higher price of active management compared to passive has been undermined by a diminishing cost differential.

Lastly, active management offers “powerful opportunities” for stewardship. Related to this, active management also offers a way to enforce “good market conduct”, one of the key principles for FCA regulated firms.

According to Mansley: “We should be challenging the passive managers much more strongly on that. Are they actually contributing to well-functioning markets?”

Ingredients

The argument for active management was bolstered by Jason Fletcher, chief investment officer at LGPS Central, who also conceded that there is a “long tail” of active managers who fail to beat the market.

Fletcher’s argument is that success is really down to spotting the ingredients for outperformance among active managers.

According to Fletcher, a high active share metric is a good indicator of out-performance. Others point out that active share stats can also enable asset owners to spot “closet” passive managers.

Fletcher observes that there is also evidence that when managers have “skin in the game” they do better.

But, he warned, managers should be linked to the downside as well as the upside of their management decisions.

The personalities of active managers can also make a difference. According to Fletcher: “Managers that outperform tend to have high conviction. On the other hand, they have the humility and the ability to learn from mistakes.”

LGPS funds work well with active management because of the economies of scale they offer due to their size.

And as long-term investors, LGPS can reduce costs by reducing investment turnover.

Fletcher also says there are other advantages to active management.

The economy benefits because index funds tend to favour only large, well-established companies. 

“Essentially, we’re giving money to the biggest companies in the world…who may not actually need that money, and we’re giving them the lowest cost of financing,” said Fletcher.

And he echoed the earlier point that active management enables better engagement with companies, especially on ESG (environmental, social and governance) issues.

Gift

According to Piers Hiller, chief investment officer for Royal London Asset Management (an investment manager providing both active and passive arrangements), the advent of ESG as a headline issue “has been a gift” to the active management industry.

The reasoning is this: It reminds active managers that they have to deliver “long-term outcomes”.

And it can also follow responsible investments. The great advantage, Hillier points out, is that if capital is tied up in passive funds it cannot be sold; it tracks an index.

Active managers, faced with concern about ESG factors, can sell up and move capital to a company that has its act together.

“Active managers have a place, in some ways, in making sure that we’re allocating to those that are [thinking about the impacts on the environment and society as a whole], but are also prepared to change and evolve.”

Disruption

There is also a case that active management is better suited to a world where technology has so disrupted markets that the classic finance theory of mean reversion—an asset price always reverts back to its long-term mean value over time—no longer holds true.

“Mean reversion does not exist in a disrupted world,” according to Geraldine Sundstrom, managing director and portfolio manager for asset manager PIMCO. 

And yet, passive management is growing in popularity when it is an inherently backward looking form of investment, unlike active.

“We’re moving towards passive, we’re moving towards quants,” Sundstrom said, “which can only look at the past.

“But the shale oil revolution will not mean revert. The Amazon effect means that real estate, the retail sector and shopping malls will not mean revert.”

Passive management may have qualities to boast about. It has provided lower cost investment and offered more reliable performance.

However, earlier this year the Financial Conduct Authority concluded passive management may have undermined corporate governance in companies and led to a decrease in “informed trading”.

At the LGPS Asset Allocation Forum it was clear that some experts still believe that, in a world concerned by long-term outcomes and ESG factors, there is still a place for active management.

The Room151 Weekly Newsletter covers local government treasury and pension investment, funding, development, resources and technical finance. Register here. 

The LGPS Quarterly Briefing focuses purely on pension fund investment. Register here.

Share

You may also like...

  • GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling 8th Feb, 2021
  • Should LGPS divest from fossil fuel assets? 26th Apr, 2021
  • LGPS: Top stories 2021 15th Dec, 2021
  • LGPS: Lessons from pooling around the world—there’s good and bad news 25th Oct, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 days ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Court ruling leaves councils facing compensation bills for water overcharging
  • Next story Doug McMurdo: LGPS, the Stewardship Code, good governance and protecting capital

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares