• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Stephan Van Arendsen: Allocation strategies for the LGPS

0
  • by Guest
  • in LGPSi
  • — 17 Mar, 2014

Stephan Van Arendsen is senior manager, corporate finance, at Cheshire West and Chester Council, administering authority for the Cheshire Pension Fund. This article was originally published in Issue 2 of Room151 Quarterly magazine. 

Every three years the role of every administering authority within the Local Government Pension Scheme comes to the fore. As the valuation process is undertaken, officers and trustees have the task of evaluating the overall status of the fund and employers, as well as agreeing contribution strategies that are fair and affordable. With increased financial pressure on all employers within funds, and not just the traditional tax raising bodies, these conversations are becoming more difficult when treated in isolation.
Of course, agreeing a contribution strategy that supports a fund’s deficit recovery plan is only one of the levers available to administering authorities as they seek to meet their overall funding objectives- the other is the question of what our assets are trying to achieve?
In considering this basic principle it is important to remember why the LGPS exists and what the primary objective all administering authorities is: we have made a pension promise to pay pensions to scheme members when they arise. We are not investment managers, we are here to ensure we have sufficient assets available when required to pay pensions. This principle is fundamental when we consider the direction of travel that the LGPS has taken since 2010. All administering authorities have seen a huge increase in the number of employers within their funds due to the outsourcing of traditional council functions to the private sector and third parties, plus the movement of schools to academy status.
Each of these employers, in addition to those already within the LGPS, has, in effect, their own balance sheet. But as the range of employers within funds is expanding we are seeing that they have a range of characteristics and funding objectives. For example, within the £3.5bn Cheshire pension fund, traditionally 85% of the liabilities have been held by four tax raising bodies. The objectives and deficit recovery plan for these four councils dominated investment strategy and asset allocation decisions with the objective being to move from an 80% to a 100% funding level over, say, a 20-year period.
Move to the present day and the Cheshire fund has more than 150 employers, the objectives for each employer vary significantly and the administering authorities need to respond accordingly both in determining contribution strategies and developing investment strategies and subsequent asset allocations that suit these different needs.
These differences can be illustrated with a comparison: why would a tax raising body that is 80% funded, with a strong covenant and 20- year recovery plan, have the same investment strategy, and take the same level of investment risk, as a private sector company that has a seven-year contract with a local authority and was set up with a 100% funding level?
At an objective level, the aspirations of both employers are fundamentally different, but most importantly for administering authorities, the risks that they present to funds are also fundamentally different. It is on this key point that the Cheshire fund believes that a different approach is required to the development of investment strategies within the LGPS in order that funds meet their primary objectives of having sufficient assets available to pay pensions when they fall due, and also meet one of the minister’s primary objectives in the recent call for evidence, which is to manage deficit recovery more effectively.
This different approach to the funds’ investment strategies and asset allocation is based on the conclusion that a single strategy is no longer sufficient to meet the overall needs of a fund and its individual employers.
The Cheshire Fund has therefore worked over the last 18 months with its investment consultant and actuary in order to define the key issues for each employer in the fund based on its:

• Funding level
• Strength of covenant
• Cash flow profile
• Maturity profile; and
• Proposed contribution strategy.

This has allowed the fund to group all of its employers into one of four notional pools which have their own characteristics and objectives. The next stage in this process has been to determine for each pool the optimum risk based strategy that will enable the objective of reaching a 100% funding target to be reached.
Again, this work has been undertaken following the completion of an ‘interim valuation’ in 2012, and these investment strategies have been set up to compliment the contribution strategies that will come into effect from 1 April, 2014 as part of the 2013 valuation.
The strategies that have been developed are:

• high growth – for a majority of the large employers in the fund who still need a level of growth from their investments (has 70 or 80% growth assets depending on employer)
• medium growth – well funded or recently set up employers (certain admission bodies and housing associations (50% growth and 50% defensive assets); and
• low growth – employers who have closed or left scheme (100% gilts)

While such a change is significant, this approach presents the fund and its employers with a more tailored suite of strategies that will support both parties in meeting their pension objectives.
Having concluded that a range of investment strategies that better reflect the individual risk characteristics of each employer, as well as containing defined ‘flight paths’ to meeting a 100% funding target over time, the fund has also taken the opportunity to enhance this risk based approach still further with a formal set of de-risking triggers being applied to each strategy.
So, for a strategy that has an overall funding level of 80% at this time, there are defined funding level triggers at various points up to 100%. Under this process, as the funding level in an investment strategy is reached, for example 84%, the fund will aim to capture this gain by reducing its exposure to growth assets in the strategy and increasing its defensive allocation. It is hoped that not only will this allow the fund to capture some of the upside from an increased funding level by reducing the exposure to more risky growth assets, but it also offers the fund greater downside protection.
It is on these principles and benefits that the fund has developed the concept with its trustees and communicated the approach to its employers who, importantly, have been advised that the de-risking approach will complement their contribution strategies.
Feedback from employers as part of the 2013 valuation process has been positive and all have engaged fully in the new approach. The appreciation of the fund managing their long-term pension risk through positive and innovative investment strategies has allowed a true collaboration to take place that will see both the objectives of the fund and employers alike to be met. It is on this premise that the Cheshire pension fund continues to see the development of appropriate investment strategies and asset allocations as key in helping it meet its primary objectives.

Share

You may also like...

  • LPP kicks off first fixed income fund LPP kicks off first fixed income fund 7 Mar, 2018
  • Climate change and economic growth Climate change and economic growth 20 Dec, 2012
  • Executive pay is the governance target for LAPFF Executive pay is the governance target for LAPFF 19 Apr, 2017
  • LGPS pooling delays and the hope for clarity from the chancellor LGPS pooling delays and the hope for clarity from the chancellor 17 Nov, 2016

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    All three days of #LATIF & FDs' Summit are available on our webcast channel gotostage.com/channel/room151

    Room151 4 days ago

    FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’: As Room151’s FDs’ Summit conference explores local government’s investment in commercial property MPs once again lable it a “significant risk to government”. Once again MPs… dlvr.it/Rr7lZx pic.twitter.com/jPvcZjDAS4

    Room151 5 days ago

    Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine: Sponsored article: Salman Ahmed argues monetary policy, a global vaccine rollout and fiscal stimulus are likely to put “upward pressure” on bond yields. Much like the latter half of 2020,[...] dlvr.it/Rr60nt pic.twitter.com/qsymBWmKmV

    Room151 6 days ago

    ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom: Recent speculation that the UK may be heading toward negative interest rates prompts questions for treasury officers managing local authority funds at LATIF. Speculation is rife that the UK… dlvr.it/Rr3Mrj pic.twitter.com/wtxYAB20PO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Interest rate and gilt supply projections
  • Next story Impact of Scottish independence on banks and treasurers

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK