• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Ambitious LPFA joins Pensions Infrastructure Project

0
  • by Jo Tura
  • in LGPSi
  • — 21 Feb, 2013

The London Pensions Fund Authority has become the tenth founding investor in the Pensions Infrastructure Project (PIP).

The PIP is now backed by the LPFA, seven corporate pension funds and two council funds (West Midlands and Strathclyde). Each signatory will at first invest £100m. The fund is expected to invest in a variety of infrastructure projects.

Mike Taylor, chief executive of the London Pension Fund Authority, explained: “We don’t believe the market has provided the sort of funds we want to invest in, hence the push to create a fund to invest in infrastructure.”

Several of the founding funds behind the PIP are, said Taylor, on the cusp of private/ public companies. They include BT and the Railways Pension Scheme. The LPFA itself provides Local Government Pension Scheme benefits to ex-employees including those of the Greater London Council and the Inner London Education Authority.

Aggregating the smaller pools of assets under one large umbrella makes sense for infrastructure investing, said Taylor, providing the correct scale for projects along with lower fees, better access to expertise and increased bidding power.

The LPFA has also been gunning for a pan-London pension fund to unite the 32 boroughs. An interview with incoming LPFA chairman Edmund Truell in this week’s Financial Times Fund Management section reported the superfund as a done deal writing: “The merger comes at a time when many funds are struggling with deficits”.

Taylor said that the merger is what the LPFA “has been working towards, it has been conjectured for quite a while”. If the London boroughs all volunteered to join a London fund a change in the law governing the separate pension funds would not be required, added Taylor.

Finance directors at the London Boroughs have expressed varied opinions on a combined fund in past interviews for Room 151. Jonathan Hunt, tri-borough director for treasury and pensions for the London Boroughs of Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham and Kensington and Chelsea said that he was not for pooling assets. “Each local authority has to remain sovereign, particularly over pension funds,” he said. “Any change to that would require a change of legislation.

Chris Buss, finance director at Wandsworth said: “An amalgamated scheme wouldn’t work for us because we are high performers. If you’re a low performing scheme you might wish to join in to it but why should we as a high performing scheme go in with a low performing scheme because all that is going to do is cost our council tax payers?”

However Camden’s Mike O’Donnell, who currently shares some pensions back office with Wandsworth said: “I have long been a supporter of amalgamation of some of the activities of some of the schemes in London. Funds of £800m to just under a billion don’t have the opportunity to look at investment in the way larger funds do.”

Share

You may also like...

  • John Harrison: The future of active management in the LGPS John Harrison: The future of active management in the LGPS 19 Apr, 2017
  • What central bank policy can tell us about 2014 What central bank policy can tell us about 2014 9 Dec, 2013
  • Peter Worth: Investment management costs bite less on LGPS Peter Worth: Investment management costs bite less on LGPS 17 May, 2017
  • Demographics: Population bulges present a strategic challenge to LGPS Demographics: Population bulges present a strategic challenge to LGPS 19 Apr, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 1 day ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 2 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 2 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Accounting for investments – an alternative view
  • Next story West Country Merger, London Shared Legal, RBKC, Surrey, City Deals

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.