• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Award winner: Essex pension chief on scrutiny and objectives

0
  • by Editor
  • in LGPS
  • — 22 Apr, 2015

Screen Shot 2015-04-20 at 10.05.48Essex Pension Fund recently became the Defined Benefit Pension Scheme of the Year. The man in charge, Kevin MacDonald, reveals how the award was won.

LGPS Funds have a long history of measuring investment performance. This has not however, always been accompanied by similar measurement of non-investment performance.

To address this, the Essex Pension Fund has sought to promote the use of a scorecard for its s101 committee to scrutinise. What was initially considered management information has become a cornerstone of how the officers interact with Cllrs and other representatives at a time when new governance arrangements commence.

Like a number of LGPS Funds, the Essex Pension Fund had for many years successfully functioned under the auspices of one body. In this case the Investment Steering Committee (ISC) was responsible not only for setting and reviewing investment strategy but also “non-investment” tasks such as determining the funding strategy and liaising with the Fund Actuary over triennial valuations and interim reviews.

Given the changing landscape, it was decided in 2008 that the Essex Pension Strategy Board (EPSB) be established. This became the s101 committee (as defined by the 1972 Local Government Act) and has overarching responsibility for the Essex Pension Fund. A new separate body – the Essex Pension Advisory Board (EPAB) – was established in February this year to fulfil the requirements of the PSPA 2013 re: Local Pension Boards.

Once established, the EPSB considered the Fund’s objectives. Although the investment strategy had always been allied to outperformance targets for specific mandates, objectives for wider Fund activity had not been formalised. Through workshops and away days with the input of officers and advisers, the EPSB agreed a twenty objectives across the following five categories: Governance, Investment, Funding, Administration and Communications.

With the objectives agreed, officers working with advisers and the Governance Team at Hymans Robertson, were then asked by the EPB to identify barriers to achievement and consider how progress could be measured. The outcomes were:

  • over eighty risks that were scored both before and after mitigating actions. These now form the basis of the Fund’s risk register; and
  • around seventy individual progress measurements to be included within a scorecard.

The objectives are kept under review and every year a business plan is agreed to highlight key actions. Included as recurring items on the EPSB’s agenda are:

  1. a quarterly business plan update;
  2. notification of risks with a changing score along with any new risks; and
  3. a “traffic light” scorecard report on progress against the objectives.

In practice this means that once set, each objective is assessed and progress evidenced. The table below gives an indication of how this approach works in practice.

Essex Pensions Matrix II_2

From time to time, the EPSB conducts a deep dive into a particular area to ensure that the objectives remain relevant and that the risks to those objectives are identified, understood and mitigated where appropriate.

As a consequence of adopting this process, the quarterly scorecard has become the key document supporting the scrutiny function. It consists of a summary “dashboard” (see picture) which highlights how many of the individual measurements are considered to have green, amber or red status. This is supported by a page for each objective.

Essex Scorecard_2

Most of the measurements are updated either quarterly or annually. A small number reflect the triennial valuation. In addition to those highlighted in the table above, other scorecard measures include:

  • administration cost per member compared to the CIPFA benchmarking average;
  • scheme member and employer survey results;
  • the receipt of compliments and complaints;
  • both internal and external audit outcomes;
  • investment returns at a high level (detailed scrutiny remains with ISC);
  • the timely publication of EPB and ISC agenda papers;
  • detailed performance against administration processing targets;
  • the timely completion of monthly investment accounting reconciliations and
  • the timely receipt of contribution income from employers

The scorecard allows the reader to both appreciate the full range of activities undertaken by the Fund (along with its officers and advisers) and gain understanding of what is and is not working. This is of particular value when new Members are introduced to the EPSB.

Evidential in nature, the scorecard captures progress (fast or slow), demonstrates transparency and prompts enquiry.

Kevin MacDonald is head of the Essex Pension Fund at Essex County Council

Share

You may also like...

  • The climate-impact: Why are green house gas emissions so important to LGPS? 21st Jul, 2021
  • Impact Awards: Shortlist revealed 2nd Jun, 2021
  • LGPS: stable outlook for employer contributions 24th May, 2022
  • Bereavement matters 20th Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Scores on the doors: manifesto housing pledges
  • Next story Derby’s s151 officer appeals summary dismissal

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares