• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Chancellor offers LGPS pools more time

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in LGPS
  • — 26 Nov, 2015

IMG_2396_2Local Government Pension Schemes have been given five extra months by government to finalise their proposals for fund pooling.

The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) yesterday published its criteria for the shape of the pools, which it said should total no more than six with a minimum of £25bn each.

Originally, councils faced a deadline of February to submit final proposals, but that timetable has now been moved back to July, with only initial proposals expected by February.

Jeff Houston, head of pensions at the Local Government Association, told Room151: “We are glad the government has listened to us. We told them there was no way that funds would be able to get approval for final proposals through their committees before February.

“There is still a hell of a lot of work to do on this.”

John Wright, head of public sector at Hymans Robertson, said: “Some funds are making progress with the ‘who’ as well, but it is right that the timetable allows some leeway for funds to work out the right groupings and partnerships to get the best outcomes for the long term.

“The timetable makes some allowance for this but we should remember that the aim should be to identify the best proposals for the long term and taking time to get this right will pay dividends in the future.”

An analysis commissioned by government from consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers indicates that pooling mechanisms can be established within 18 months.

It said that liquid assets could be transferred over a relatively short timeframe, beginning in April 2018, but accepts that “illiquid assets are likely to transition over a longer period of time”.

William Bourne_2

William Bourne

However, William Bourne, director at pension adviser City Noble, warned that the timescale was still too short.

He said: “The experience of the London CIV and the LLPP (Lancashire and LPFA partnership) is that the proposed timing is extremely challenging.

“It will be even more so for pools comprising perhaps eight or ten authorities who may be widely separated geographically.”

In a document released yesterday, the DCLG made it clear that it would leave it to funds to determine their own governance structures, and would allow for both passive and active management.
It said: “The government recognises that both active and passive management have a role to play in the LGPS.

“However, authorities should only use active fund management where it can be shown to deliver value for money, and authorities should review how fees and net performance in each listed asset class compare to a passive index.”

Funds will, however, be required to explain the proportion of their fund they intend to invest in infrastructure, and their ambitions for the future.

Houston also indicated that more pools could yet emerge, in addition to the prospective ones already announced.

He said: “There are some discussions among funds in a ring around London. Wales also has its own proposal although it is up in the air as to whether this would be allowed – they currently only hold £12bn to £13bn.”

“One of the things we want to avoid is pools all assuming that they can meet the £25bn threshold just because they have been in discussions with a particular fund. For instance, Gloucestershire could go into any one of three or four.”

He added that discussions are continuing on how governance will work in practice, with some funds concerned about losing control over the selection of fund managers.

“If Greater Manchester goes into a pool with lots of smaller funds, then is it just one-fund-one-vote or is their weighting depending on the size of assets?” he said.

Bourne said: “The guidance hardly touches on the challenging issue of how elected councillors will be able to hold the pools accountable, beyond saying that authorities will need to set that out in their proposals. We still find it hard to envisage what an authority will do with an underperforming pool.

“Will they be able to move pools? Or sack the managers, who quite possibly under some structures would be officers in neighbouring authorities?”

Alongside the pooling criteria, the government also yesterday announced proposals to scrap current regulations placing caps on certain types of investment classes.

Instead, funds would be asked to publish an investment strategy statement allowing them to take a prudential approach.

Bourne said: “Under the new regime many of the specific 2009 investment regulations would be revoked. These include the restrictions on stock lending, the requirement to monitor performance of managers every three months, the requirement to use an adequate number of managers, and even the requirement to report against the Myners principles.

“We would have liked the criteria to include a test as to whether the proposed pooling would result in a better outcome for all pensioners. We remain concerned that while it may benefit those in poorer performing schemes, that may not be the case for the many in well-run ones.”

Share

You may also like...

  • How does LGPS identify “authentic” place-based impact opportunities? 9th Jun, 2021
  • Why doesn’t LGPS make more noise about diversity among asset managers? 14th Oct, 2021
  • The risks of de-risking LGPS 12th Jul, 2021
  • The opportunity in the renewables and grid support market as UK looks to ‘build back better’ 3rd Mar, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 3 days ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 5 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 5 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story James Bevan: Autumn Statement “more political than economic”
  • Next story Osborne’s capital receipts measure poses tough questions

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares