• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Complexity undermining good governance, says LGPS adviser

0
  • by Gavin Hinks
  • in 151 News · LGPS
  • — 27 Aug, 2019

Underlying governance for the Local Government Pension Scheme is so complex it could provide an “excuse” for non compliance with guidance and advice given to administering authorities, according to an expert.

The comments follow a recently published review which looked closely at governance models used across local authority pension funds. The review, commissioned by the Scheme Advisory Board, was followed last week by the publication of a Local Government Association (LGA) document outlining the multifaceted nature of LGPS governance.

William Bourne, director of the investment advisory firm Linchpin, writes in a blog post that the involvement of so many bodies is “the underlying issue” for LGPS governance.

“The outcome is grey areas in the guidance and advice which provide anyone who doesn’t wish to comply with an excuse not to,” Bourne writes.
He adds: “There are too many fingers in the pie.”

Bourne also contradicts the idea that local pension boards (LPBs) are the “ultimate” decision makers for pension schemes.
“Anyone involved will know that that is a misrepresentation of reality, where LPBs have zero executive powers and almost no sanctions they can impose.” He adds that the governance structure nonetheless makes it “too easy for other parts of the LGPS to pass responsibility on to LPBs”.

The governance review, undertaken by Hymans Robertson, lists four key recommendations, but Bourne writes: “I wish the Hymans proposals well but to make a real difference somebody (the SAB?) needs to reduce the number of bodies involved in the LGPS.”

Bodies integrated into the LGPS decision making process include The Pensions Regulator, local pension boards, pension officer groups, technical groups, the Communications Working Group, the Local Government Pensions Committee, the Scheme Advisory Board and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. The Scottish Pensions Liaison Group is also involved as are Scottish ministers and the Scottish Public Pensions Agency.

The Hymans review was tasked with assessing the effectiveness of current governance arrangements and to consider alternatives or improvements that could be made.
After conducting a poll, Hymans found broad preference for a governance model dubbed the “greater ring fencing” model.

Hymans made four recommendations. These included the use of a “outcomes-based approach” with “minimum standards” rather than a “prescribed governance model”. Hymans also listed critical features of this approach including “clarity on roles and responsibilities for decision making”.
Other recommendations included “enhanced training” for s101 committees and section 151 officers. The review also called for an update of relevant guidance.

Hymans heard from those surveyed for the review that no new bodies were required in the governance process and also concluded that governance structures were “not the only determinant of good governance”. Those surveyed also favoured a “set of standards that all funds are required to achieve” that do not impose “disproportionate burden” on administering authorities.

Bourne received some sympathy for his views as did the review’s recommendation for “minimum standards”. John Jones, senior adviser with MJ Hudson Investment Advisers, said he favoured a governance framework based on principles and “outputs” rather than one that was “too rule bound” or based on check lists.

The Pensions Regulator (TPR), Jones added, focused “too much on the latter and the danger is that the bigger picture is missed.”
Jones said he agreed “there are too many bodies providing oversight”.

“The TPR is not yet fully familiar with the LGPS and local authority decision making. They should take a step a backwards and focus on other corporate funds when there are other bodies with more experience and knowledge.”

Jones added “there is a need for the SAB to take a stronger lead where LGPS governance is concerned.”
He said: “CIPFA too should take a bigger role where s151 officer responsibilities are concerned and this is now in hand.”

Get the Room 151 LGPS Quarterly Briefing

Room151 Conferences & Events

Share

You may also like...

  • Lessons from Ukraine: are defence exclusions ‘responsible’? 7th Mar, 2022
  • How does LGPS identify “authentic” place-based impact opportunities? 9th Jun, 2021
  • LGPS & COP26: The expected, the needed and the opportunities 26th Oct, 2021
  • LGPS annual report: Little drama but investment costs at £1.29bn 21st Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 6 hours ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 11 hours ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 1 day ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 1 week ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 week ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Stephen Sheen: The state of local government audit
  • Next story Javid brings forward Spending Review

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares