• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

LGPS: Chancellor’s regional pooling questioned

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in LGPS
  • — 8 Oct, 2015

LGPSGeorge Osborne this week announced that he wants to see Local Government Pension Scheme investments pooled on a regional basis – an approach immediately questioned by leading figures in the sector.

Speaking to the Conservative Party conference in Manchester this week, Osborne seemed to partially pre-empt the outcome of the forthcoming consultation on LGPS pooling by backing the creation of regional pools.

He branded the pools “British Wealth Funds” and said they would help increase the sums invested by LGPS funds in domestic infrastructure projects.

“At the moment, we have 89 different local government pension funds with 89 sets of fees and costs. It’s expensive and they invest little or nothing in our infrastructure.” he said.
“So I can tell you today we’re going to work with councils to create, instead, half a dozen British Wealth Funds spread across the country.

“It will save hundreds of millions in costs, and crucially they’ll invest billions in the infrastructure of their regions.”

Nick Greenwood, pension fund manager at The Royal County of Berkshire Pension Fund, told Room151: “It is disappointing that the chancellor has apparently announced the outcome of the consultation before it is launched.

“I am not sure that a regional approach is the right one, as there is a risk that poor performance in one pool could lead to contribution increases that impact council tax across a whole region.”

Mike Jensen, chief investment officer of Lancashire County Pension Fund, said: “The suggestion that this should be regional is a bit odd, given the concentration of the bigger funds in the North and West Midlands, but the idea is obviously in tune with our thinking, hence our joint venture with London.”

But Linda Selman, head of local government investment at pensions investment consultancy Hymans Robertson, said the chancellor’s position may be more flexible than it first appeared. “Our understanding is that while there is a preference from government for regional pools, this is not set in stone. If there are other ways to make savings then they are still on the table,” she said.

A spokesperson for the Conservative Party confirmed that the chancellor’s announcement was not prescriptive, and that the size and shape of the pools was only “rough”.

Selman said that LGPS funds currently have around 1% of around £200m of investments in infrastructure. Raising that to around 10% to match some foreign pension funds would bring in a maximum of an extra £20bn to the sector.

“Dividing that between six or more regional pools may make it slightly less easy to achieve diversification of investment – a national infrastructure pool may provide more opportunities and could still sit alongside regional arrangements,” she said.

Greenwood warned that the ability of individual funds to set their own investment strategies and asset allocations could be eroded under the proposed new arrangements.

“Unless competitive tension is created there will be an inevitable move to lacklustre performance due to index tracking and similar asset allocation for everyone.”

Competition could be created, he said, by the publication of cost and performance league tables and the ability for funds to move between pools.

The Conservative Party spokesperson said there will be no compulsion for funds to invest in infrastructure.

Jeff Huston, head of pensions at the Local Government Association, said that the chancellor had “seen the appetite large pension funds in the US and Canada have for infrastructure and wants to create the same sort of environment here”.

However, he said Osborne’s branding of the new pools as wealth funds was “unfortunate as their primary purpose remains the payment of pensions not investment in any particular asset class”.

UNISON general secretary Dave Prentis said: “The chancellor shouldn’t use our pension funds as a convenient way of making up for the infrastructure investment that no longer happens. Nor should they be used as replacement capital for the government’s privatisation programmes.

“PFI has been a disaster for both the pension funds investing in it and the public authorities who are now having to pick up the costs. Yet another abuse of our members’ pension funds cannot be allowed to happen.”

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS: responding to the new normal 8th Mar, 2022
  • Fears that members are ‘opting out of LGPS over cost-of-living crisis’ 14th Jun, 2022
  • LGPS: “Are we 100% funded?” 15th Jun, 2021
  • Increasing opportunities in infrastructure 19th Jul, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 10 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 day ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 1 day ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Business rates reform: View from the experts
  • Next story Business rates reform raises uncertainty for council revenues

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK