• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

LGPS governance consultation moots s151 responsibilities split

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · LGPS
  • — 17 Apr, 2019

Local authorities could be required to remove pension fund responsibilities from section 151 officers under forthcoming LGPS governance reforms.

The suggestion is among a raft of measures mooted within four main proposed governance models on which the LGPS Scheme Advisory Board (SAB) launched a consultation this week.

The proposals follow an initial fact-finding exercise carried out by pension consultant Hymans Robertson, following their appointment in January to explore governance improvements.

One of the options under consideration would see much greater ring-fencing of LGPS activities from their host authority, including a requirement for funds to appoint their own section 151 officers.

Hymans said: “The measures suggested would promote the understating that the pension fund budget is different from other areas of the council’s budget in that it is funded directly from the pension fund and impacts the long term, but not short term, budgets of all participating employers, not just the administering authority.”

Under the ring-fenced model, the section 151 of the administering authority could retain responsibility for the pensions function with recommendations on budget made by a pension fund officer to the pensions committee – which would be responsible for agreeing the budget.

However, the document went on to say: “Alternatively, the pension fund could have a separate section 151 officer to reduce conflicts currently faced by section 151s”.

The document said that further work is needed to determine whether changes to the section 151 officer role could be encouraged by regulatory bodies “or whether it is possible and/or desirable to find a mechanism by which these could be mandated”.

However, the radical suggestion that the section 151 officer role could be split is likely to face stiff opposition from some quarters.

The results of Hymans’s initial fact-finding exercise found that section 151 officers of administering funds believe that current arrangements are effective and that “given pooling, further structural change would not be welcome”.

One section 151 officer, who wanted to remain anonymous, said: “I don’t know what has triggered this work.

“The creation of additional posts or administration would inevitably add costs to running funds.

“We shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that most funds are increasingly fully funded and we are in a very good place as a sector.”

Chris Buss, former deputy chief executive of London Borough of Wandsworth, questioned whether a “one-size-fits-all” approach would be useful.

He said: “I think there is an advantage, in authorities where the pension fund is intrinsically linked to the authority – such as in London boroughs – for a section 151 officer to have a broad overview.

“In areas where counties have been split up and funds now cover a number of authorities, there is less argument for retaining a combined role.”

Speaking to Room151, Bob Holloway, SAB pensions secretary, said: “One of the primary aims of this project is to get to the bottom of any of the anecdotal evidence that there are instances where section 151 officers are conflicted.

“They have a financial stewardship roles and sometimes that doesn’t sit neatly with their LGPS role, particularly at valuation time.”

However, he admitted that if the project recommends a splitting of the section 151 role, there was likely to be “some resistance”.

Under the ring-fenced option, according to the Hymans report, funds could set their own budget, with charges for support services from the host authority included up front.

“This removes the common practice whereby pension fund expenditure is paid though the host authority’s revenue account to be recharged at a later date,’ the document said.

An alternative model included in the document would see the scheme manager decision-making function delegated to a joint committee of all authorities participating as employers.

Assets and liabilities would still sit with the administering authority.

Under this system, “section 151s of the constituent local authority employers retain a fiduciary duty to the local taxpayer” but an inter-authority agreement “would distance them legally from budget setting responsibilities in respect of the pensions function”.

The third option would ape that currently used by South Yorkshire Pension Fund, which has an independent scheme manager function, with all decision making passed to a combined authority.

The combined authority would exist for the sole purpose of administering the LGPS fund, would be comprised of councillors from constituent local authorities, and would produce its own accounts.

Finally, another model would use guidance or amendments to the LGPS regulations 2013 to provide greater clarity on minimum staffing levels, pension committee representation, and ensuring a greater voice for all fund employers.

Hymans is aiming to prepare a summary of results for the SAB meeting in July.

Writing for Room151 in February, SAB secretary Jeff Houston said the fact that the current system “does not lead to problematic examples of conflicts of interest is testament to the professionalism and expertise of officers and the non-partisan, scheme focused approach of elected members.

“However, as in all things, there is room for improvement.”

Share

You may also like...

  • Room151’s 10th Anniversary: LGPS shifts from alternatives to pooling and Covid 3rd Nov, 2021
  • LGPS webinar: Central bank management of bond purchasing could affect all asset classes 1st Mar, 2021
  • GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling 8th Feb, 2021
  • Why doesn’t LGPS make more noise about diversity among asset managers? 14th Oct, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 17 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 17 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 7 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story LGPS Q&A: London CIV’s Mike O’Donnell
  • Next story Iain Campbell: The challenge of measuring carbon emissions

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares