• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

LGPS: Passive management not a priority while deficits are the big issue

0
  • by Gavin Hinks
  • in LGPS
  • — 21 May, 2015

Joanne Segers, NAPFThere is no support for a move to mandatory passive management in the Local Government Pension Scheme, according to a survey. The news comes weeks after stories appeared in the press suggesting some funds may consider a legal challenge to any imposition of passive management.

Research released this week by the National Association of Pensions Funds revealed it could find no respondent in a survey who believed that mandating passive management was a priority for LGPS. Indeed more than a third of those surveyed said government’s priority should be tackling pension fund deficits. Among the concerns for the year is consolidating pensions boards while 4% of those polled said merger of funds was top of the urgent issues list.

In a speech at a conference on Tuesday NAPF chief executive Joanne Segers (pictured) said: “If bedding down local pension boards is the challenge for the LGPS this year, valuations will be the big challenge for 2016.”

But the big concern remains deficit funding. The deficit is currently estimated to stand at £47bn Among those question 72% said their funding position would improve or stay the same. Meanwhile in the event that funding levels deteriorate 39% of respondents said they would seek more contributions from employers, while 22% said employees would be targeted to contribute more.

Segers said: “This will put even greater pressure on employers at a time when austerity will be already presenting problems for councils and participating employers. Asking for extra money at a time when there isn’t any won’t be an easy, or welcome, ask.”

According to Segers the importance of the deficit means a consistent approach to measurement is required while innovation will be needed to manage deficits.

“The LGPS is a great scheme, but we know there’s room for improvement. And one of the great strengths of the scheme is that drive for continual improvement – that common ambition to deliver a lasting and sustainable LGPS that binds us together,” said Segers.

John Harrison, a director, multi asset at Henderson Global Investors and an independent investment adviser to local authorities, agreed with Segers. He believes LGPS now needs more attention to liability management and greater diversification in asset allocation.

Harrison said: “The NAPF is wholly correct to highlight tackling the deficit as the key issue facing the sector; unless we do so the LGPS will become increasingly unaffordable.”

He added: “The focus on cost reduction that was evident in the consultation exercises prior to the Election did not address this; it would be unfortunate if the new Government continued to focus purely on costs rather than on cost effectiveness.”

Harrison added that proposals for passive management is not well founded. “The interesting bit of the NAPF conference was the idea that ministers will come back to the question of how we will squeeze something out of the cost base of LGPS.

“The LGPS is already pretty cost effective so to focus on abandoning active management to go passive management is, I think, misguided.”

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS Challenges: Balancing Realpolitik and responsible investment 1st Mar, 2021
  • SCAPE plan: How to reset a discount rate 19th Jul, 2021
  • ‘100 greener days in office’ 19th May, 2021
  • Delivering net zero: Strathclyde plunges into Clean Growth Fund 21st Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 1 day ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story News Roundup: Solar farm investment, LGPS reform, welfare hardship, Royal Commission for property tax
  • Next story Agent151: A letter to Greg Clark, at DCLG

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares