• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

London CIV’s plan for restructured investment options meets resistance

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · LGPSi
  • — 8 Mar, 2018

London LGPS funds have voiced concerns over investment responsibilities under reform plans proposed by the London Collective Investment Vehicle (LCIV).

The capital’s Local Government Pension Scheme pool is currently consulting on proposals to shake-up its governance and investment regime following a critical review released last year.

In response to the review, the LCIV has put forward a simplified model, giving funds a choice of three blended investment mandates in addition to a separate passive option.

The consultation document says: “Our assessment of the current model indicates that it will not achieve the 50bp per annum target originally specified.

“Almost no discretion has been granted to the LCIV to achieve the 35bp improved investment performance.”

It also said that sub-funds cannot be launched without sufficient seed money, which “creates delays and potentially leads to high ‘opportunity costs’.”

In a radical overhaul, the CIV proposes that investment options will be reduced to three strategies.

The first, dubbed “low cost” would combine passive equity funds with a “liability aware fund”.

The second, “basic”, option would divide 11 sub-funds into three baskets covering equity, fixed income and real assets which London authorities could allocate assets between.

The third “enhanced” option would mirror the second, with the CIV given greater powers on execution, tactical asset allocation, rebalancing and hedging.

Needs

However, a number of funds have voiced worries that the proposals would reduce their ability to allocate assets according to their needs.

A report to councillors drafted by Mark Maidment, London Borough of Wandsworth’s deputy chief executive and director of resources, said: “The concern is that asset allocation is the major contributor to fund performance and by forcing a blended option on individual funds this may negate any efficiency saving, create a de facto passive mandate and hinder their specific requirements.

“The blended option as portrayed will mean the CIV will allocate investments as it sees fit and not in accordance with individual funds strategic and/or specific requirements.”

Nigel Cook, head of pensions investments at London Borough of Croydon, said the CIV’s proposal “seems to imply that the local authority’s investment strategy will be subordinated to the choices made by the CIV, and the pension committee will have to be prepared to compromise”.

He added: “This runs counter to the government guidance on drafting and adopting an investment strategy statement (ISS), and the autonomy and statutory obligations of individual pension committees in respect of their individual authorities.”

Non-blended

A number of authorities are supporting the inclusion of a fourth non-blended mandate, an option proposed by the Society of London Treasurers according to Havering Council’s consultation response.

Maidment’s report said this would mean that “each manager within the pool would have a separate investment focus (e.g. income, growth, low carbon, concentrated/diverse, geographically focussed, etc.).”

Karen Shackleton, senior adviser at MJ Hudson Allenbridge, told Room151: “I do have some reservations about the blended solution, in that the limited number of sub-funds does not, at first sight, appear to offer the London boroughs sufficient flexibility to tailor their strategic asset allocation to their own fund-specific needs.

“For example, meeting cash-flow needs, diversifying equity risk without further compromising liquidity, or rolling out a low carbon investment strategy.

“However, the London CIV has asked for feedback from the London boroughs as part of its consultation process, so hopefully these concerns will be addressed following on from that discussion.”

Elsewhere in his response, Cook raised concerns about a statement within the consultation that “the CIV will not be able to accommodate individual environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies for each London local authority (LLA)”.

Cook said that this was “problematic and not acceptable”, suggesting instead a qualified majority approach to deciding ESG policy within the pool, and a “proactive approach” of creating sub-products that address different LLAs’ ESG requirements.

Consultation responses showed greater support from individual funds for proposals to reform the governance of the CIV.

The proposals would see a slimmed-down consultative shareholder group of 12 treasurers and pension chairs, along with two general meetings a year for all funds.

Cook said the governance recommendations should make it easier for the CIV to operate and mean a “less bulky and unwieldy oversight structure”, but warned that  “reduced representation will bring its own challenges and there is little detail on how a consensus would be reached”.

A statement provided to Room151 by a London CIV spokesperson, said: “London CIV is a pioneer in establishing pooled arrangements and we are now taking stock of how best to deliver the original vision for the CIV in the light of the wider changes that are happening in local authority pension fund management.

“We are having discussions with our stakeholders about how we respond to the governance review and no decisions have been taken as yet.

“As we are engaging with our stakeholders and listening to their views we do not want to prematurely anticipate the variety of possible responses that could result.”

The CIV’s proposals are set to be discussed by London council leaders later this month.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • NAO questions regional growth accountability NAO questions regional growth accountability 5 Dec, 2013
  • LGPS Roundtable: Geo-political risk and asset allocation LGPS Roundtable: Geo-political risk and asset allocation 19 Apr, 2017
  • News Roundup: Lancashire’s rating, refugee funding, planning in the High Court, pension boards News Roundup: Lancashire’s rating, refugee funding, planning in the High Court, pension boards 6 Aug, 2015
  • A new Stewardship Code holds implications for LGPS A new Stewardship Code holds implications for LGPS 3 Feb, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 3 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 3 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 3 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 3 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 4 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 4 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Quartet of councils lined up for Municipal Bond Agency’s first issue
  • Next story Guy Ware: The business rates retention row of ducks

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.