• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

New code places data pressure on LGPS governance

0
  • by Editor
  • in LGPS
  • — 19 Mar, 2015

William Bourne_2

LGPS managers will be under pressure to address documentation and record keeping by the pension regulator’s new code of practice, says William Bourne

The Pensions Regulator’s (TPR) draft Code of Practice No 14 in respect of public service pension funds will become official guidance for all scheme managers under the LGPS Scheme on 1st April 2015. TPR Codes provide practical guidance and set out expected standards, but do not comprise a legal statement.  However, any manager choosing not to comply with the code would have to demonstrate that the legal requirements set out under the Pensions Acts 2004 and 2008 are met and the code’s provisions might be used as evidence in court.

TPR’s code is divided into the following sections: conflicts of interest and representation, knowledge and understanding, publishing information, internal controls, scheme record-keeping, maintenance of contributions, providing information to members, internal dispute resolution and reporting breaches of the law.

As long-established functioning pension schemes, LGPS managers and governance procedures will, in many cases, already have processes in place which meet the new TPR requirements.  However, not all scheme managers have yet appreciated what will be required of them after 1st April and, in particular, in the area of documentation and record-keeping.  The point we make is that TPR will expect schemes not just to meet them but to be able to demonstrate it, and this may require a change of emphasis in how LGPS managers document their activities.

Schemes should ensure that there is an agreed and documented conflicts policy and procedure, which includes identifying, monitoring and managing potential conflicts of interest. They should keep this under regular review while also demonstrating this is taking place.

On knowledge and understanding, “Schemes should keep appropriate records of the learning activities of individual pension board members and the board as a whole”. We are not convinced that all schemes currently do this for their existing panels or committees, let alone for the new pension boards.

Schemes should prepare and keep an updated list of the documents with which they consider pension board members need to be conversant. This will enable them to effectively carry out their role.  They should make sure that both the list and the documents are available in accessible formats.  Again, how many schemes keep such a list, let alone specifically set up for the new pension boards?

Pension board members should undertake personal training which needs analysis, and regularly review their skills, competencies and knowledge to identify gaps or weaknesses. They should use a personalised training plan to document and address these promptly.  Can schemes today demonstrate a personal needs analysis?

Schemes should continually review their data and carry out a data review exercise at least annually. This should include an assessment of the accuracy and completeness of the member information data held.  We would expect most schemes to review their data regularly but how many publish an assessment of the member data, let alone other data such as performance data?

Currently most public service pension schemes are exempt from such a requirement under s227 of the Pensions Act 2004 but this makes it clear that, even though they are legally exempt, they will be expected to create such a record. Consequently, public service pension schemes should develop a record for monitoring the payment of contributions to the scheme – ie. contributions monitoring record which must reflect any requirements in scheme regulations where relevant.  Schemes should also prepare this record in consultation with employers.

The 1 April deadline is fast approaching, and most LGPS schemes are simultaneously busy setting up their Local Pension Boards. The TPR’s own response to its most recent consultation on compliance and enforcement for public service pension schemes, which closed on 5 March, has not yet been published.  It is therefore almost inevitable that LGPS schemes will be given some time to comply with the new requirements.  However, officers with responsibility for governance and compliance will need to turn their attention to the new code before much time has elapsed.

William Bourne is a director at City Noble.

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS: Lessons from pooling around the world—there’s good and bad news 25th Oct, 2021
  • Ryan Boothroyd: Post-covid world holds opportunity for long-term LGPS investors 28th Apr, 2021
  • Avoiding the ‘flaw of averages’ in your LGPS actuarial valuation 5th Oct, 2021
  • ‘100 greener days in office’ 19th May, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 9 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 9 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Pension authority breaks new ground for LGPS management
  • Next story Barnet lands largest TIF outside an enterprise zone

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares