• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Northern LGPS warns asset pooling plans are unlawful

0
  • by Chris Smith
  • in 151 News · LGPS
  • — 3 Apr, 2019

The country’s biggest Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) pool has hinted it could take legal action unless ministers rethink guidance on asset pooling.

Northern LGPS has told local government minister Rishi Sunak it has “serious concerns” over proposed changes to pooling which it says go beyond ministerial powers and will cost millions of pounds if implemented.

The guidance, the pool claims, will result in a one-size fits all approach which would impact its ability to achieve best value for fund members.

The letter was accompanied by legal advice from Jason Coppel QC concluding the government would lose if Northern LGPS was to seek a judicial review at the High Court.

It warned: “In our view, the courts would conclude that, if issued in its current form, the draft guidance was ultra vires the secretary of state’s power.”

The warning was made in response to draft guidance issued in January by the government.

The letter – signed by Paul Doughty, chair of Northern & Merseyside Pension Fund, Brenda Warrington, chair of Greater Manchester Pension Fund, and Andrew Thornton, chair of West Yorkshire Pension Fund – said a proposed requirement to set up an FCA-regulated company was “unnecessarily prescriptive”.

More generally, it said that  “There is no evidence given in the consultation as to why the prescriptive requirements of the new guidance are beneficial to stakeholders.”

The pool’s legal advice said the draft guidance is a huge departure from the government’s original idea to introduce a less prescriptive, deregulated regime through the Local Government Pension Scheme (Management and Investment of Funds) Regulations 2016.

It said: “…the draft guidance purports to be guidance but it contains, in key respects particularly in relation to the need for a FCA-regulated company, directions as to how administering authorities are to engage in pooling”.

The formation or appointment of an FCA-regulated company would involve unnecessary and unjustified expenditure of up to £15m, the legal opinion added.

“Northern LGPS considers that incurring these additional costs would be inconsistent with the fiduciary duty of its constituent administering authorities to manage the assets of members, employers and taxpayers in the most cost-effective way.”

The advice added that the extra costs fall squarely within the scope of the New Burdens Doctrine, meaning the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) should fund them.

It also said that the guidance was preceded by an unlawful consultation

The QC added: “Should judicial review proceedings be commenced, it would also be for the secretary of state to demonstrate through evidence that his consultation was conducted whilst his policy was at a formative stage (in circumstances where the MHCLG appears to have been committed to this course for some time) and that adequate reasons for the proposal were advanced.”

The trio said the scale of Northern LGPS meant the draft guidance is “sub-optimal” for their needs and set out other areas for the government to consider:

The removal of the value-for-money criterion from the latest draft guidance would undermine the original point of LGPS pooling reform, it claimed;

The assertion that individual funds should be prepared to suffer an increase in their costs in order to benefit other funds in the pool or the wider LGPS is clearly at odds with authorities’ fiduciary duty, according to the pool.

Northern LGPS said it had been supportive of the pooling reforms but could not back the current proposals.

The letter said: “We have serious concerns both about the manner in which the [draft guidance] was presented for consultation and its contents. 

“We also believe that the original policy objectives behind asset pooling have been either overlooked or disregarded in the draft guidance; they certainly do not feature formally in the draft guidance and we are not aware that the government has changed those objectives.”

The group warned: “The government will no doubt be aware that in various fields of the law, judicial review proceedings have been brought to challenge the exercise of executive powers where the courts have determined that consultation exercises have been procedurally unfair to the extent that they have been unlawful.”

As previously reported by Room 151, the guidance would give administering authorities a deadline of 2020 after which they should not normally make investments outside their LGPS pool.

The guidance will limit the types of investment that member funds are allowed to retain.

It is the latest phase of the pooling process started by former chancellor George Osborne, designed to cut costs and encourage local government funds to invest in infrastructure projects.

by Chris Smith

Share

You may also like...

  • ‘100 greener days in office’ 19th May, 2021
  • What’s in store for the LGPS in 2022? 7th Jan, 2022
  • MRP could inflict ‘massive harm’, LATIF North delegates told 22nd Mar, 2022
  • Ryan Boothroyd: Post-covid world holds opportunity for long-term LGPS investors 28th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
    • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override
    • EAPF criticised for water company investments
    • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy
    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 5 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 6 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 6 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Finance professionals need to be on top of the detail but senior people must also address strategy
  • Next story Brexit fears push rates lower, sparking £2bn PWLB borrowing spree

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares