• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Plans for LGPS London fund to go ahead while government explores merger

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · LGPSi
  • — 11 Dec, 2013

Council leaders in London have decided to press ahead with plans for a collective investment vehicle (CIV) to jointly manage their pension pots, despite a government consultation which could scupper the initiative.
At a meeting on Tuesday, a group of council leaders from across the capital voted to continue preparations for the vehicle, including taking steps to engage a project manager and legal and financial advisers.

The decision was taken even though local government minister Brandon Lewis has appointed consultant Hymans Robertson to examine a range of options for reforming the Local Government Pension Scheme, which could include the London funds.

A report to the meeting said: “The interest being shown by the minister presents a risk that government decisions/actions will impact on any decisions taken by leaders’ committee to pursue a CIV in London.”
One of the three options being considered by the consultation is to create a CIV covering the whole of England and Wales, which would mean that the London CIV would be redundant.

Speaking to Room 151, Chris Bilsland, finance director of the City of London Corporation, said: “The size of the London proposals – a pot of around £30 billion – fits well with the other options, which would see the creation a number of collaborative funds.
“But if the minister decides to go with a pooled approach across the whole of England and Wales, our preparatory work could help feed into the creation of any new vehicle.”

However, Hackney mayor Jules Pipe, chairman of London Councils, has written to Lewis to ask for an indication of his views of the London proposals, and whether spending an estimated £500,000 on set up costs would be a waste of cash.
In his letter, he said: “Whilst, of course, you will still have formal decisions to make on the matters you are consulting on, some indication of the reasonableness of the steps we are taking to improve the efficiency and performance of pensions in London would provide us with some additional assurance at this point.”

The proposals agreed by the London leaders would see a vehicle which would allow borough pension committees to continue to decide on the balance of asset types across their portfolio, while the CIV would engage fund managers to manage the investments collectively.

So far 20 funds in the capital have said they are keen to participate and are prepared to contribute between £25,000 and £50,000 to set-up costs. Another six are keen to participate but have not agreed whether to contribute to set-up costs, while six funds are undecided about joining, along with one that has said it does not want to take part.

The model for the London CIV would most likely be an Authorised Contractual Scheme, which would have preferable tax treatment by the Treasury, and is seen as being attractive to fund managers, insurance companies and pension funds that might otherwise look abroad to invest.
Leaders heard that, with close to full participation, annual savings for the capital’s LGPS funds would be in the region of £120 million per year, with annual running costs of around £4.8 million a year.

Share

You may also like...

  • Warrington outlines robust defence of out-of-borough investments Warrington outlines robust defence of out-of-borough investments 20 Feb, 2019
  • Local government leaders call for IFRS9 statutory override Local government leaders call for IFRS9 statutory override 7 Feb, 2018
  • Partners at loggerheads over Birmingham PFI deal Partners at loggerheads over Birmingham PFI deal 25 Apr, 2019
  • Ministry repeats business rates blunder despite tightened oversight Ministry repeats business rates blunder despite tightened oversight 3 Jun, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story CIPFA disciplines officers for negligence over Icelandic investments
  • Next story Has Wales banned money market funds?

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.