• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Q&A: Mike Weston on the Pensions Infrastructure Platform and LGPS

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in LGPS
  • — 24 Jun, 2015

Mike Weston, NAPFThe Pensions Infrastructure Platform (PIP) launched its second fund last week with at least one local authority on board. The Solar fund kicked off with £131m. Chief executive Mike Weston, who joined the Pensions Infrastructure Platform from his previous role as the Daily Mail’s chief investment officer, talks to Room151 about a proposed investment in the new Thames Sewer, a proposed £1bn multi-investment fund, and opportunities for local government schemes to get involved.

A not for profit owned by the NAPF, the platform was created to encourage infrastructure investment opportunities following discussion with HM Treasury and the Pension Protection Fund.

Q: Things with PIP went quiet for a while – what’s been happening?
As you are aware, we launched our first fund – the PPP equity fund which achieved first close in February last year. The fund , which is managed by Dalmore Capital, has a hard cap of £600m and will likely close in the autumn. We are on £510m at the moment. One of the investors that has come on board is Greater Manchester Pension Fund.

Launching that fund demonstrated it was possible to put PIP intoreality and engage with an established player in the market. That was a major stepping stone. After that, everyone took a big breath and thought what happens next? The first decision by the founder members was that they hadn’t had enough and wanted to go forward. That led to my recruitment along with an investment director and chief operating officer.

Q: And you launched your second fund recently?
Yes, the solar PV fund reached first close last week with £131m commitments from four of the founder PIP members. Strathclyde invested, but West Midlands didn’t because they already have significant solar investments and didn’t want to be overexposed. It will have a hard cap of £250m.

Q: What is the main challenge you have faced since joining?
Some of it has been dispelling some myths. It took a while to get PIP going because there was a perception among some funds – particularly in local government – that it was a secret arm of government and the treasury to pursue a central agenda. Nobody wanted to talk to us. We are not an arm of government.

Q: How does PIP work? What are the risk and return profiles?
We have 10 founding investors and between us we identify interesting opportunities. The advantage is that a manager can get to first close by talking to these investors and a limited marketing effort. After that, the manager can invest and market the opportunity to other pension funds.

Q:What other investment opportunities are you looking at?
We are awaiting a decision on the preferred bidder to build the Thames Tideway super sewer. We are involved with one of the bidding consortia through Dalmore – PIP has said it will contribute around £380m to the £1.25bn funding costs if the consortium wins. An announcement is due around the time of the Budget.

Q: What else are you working on?
A longer term aim is to transform PIP into an authorised asset manager in its own right so we don’t have to find commercial asset managers to invest for us. We know that individual funds need an intermediate body and the objective is that PIP is able to fulfil that role. The idea is that there would be mutual ownership along the John Lewis model. Our application to the Financial Conduct Authority has been submitted.

Q: What would that enable you to do?
Once we are authorised then we would aim to launch a multi strategy fund. We would be aiming to get a fund of around £1b with 15 to 20 individual investments. If we get a decent number of investments we can be a meaningful player in the marketplace. Scale is an advantage in infrastructure investment.

Q: Would you be seeking more investors?
We are open to take on more founding investors and for investors looking to get involved in individual funds. The founding investors are effectively providing development funding for the PIP. They have the ability to coinvest alongside funds and are able to opt out of particular investments. They tend to be bigger schemes.

Q: Do you think you have overcome some of the worries about the construction risk that was associated with infrastructure development?
In the case of the Tideway Tunnel project, there is a significant element of construction – it is the biggest building project after Crossrail and before HS2. But the construction risk has been mitigaged by the way the contract allocates cost overruns between various parties. It also has a government guarantee scheme in place. This makes it a low risk project. It shows that there can be construction risk but if mitigated in a sensible way then they are still attractive. It is all about an appropriate return for an appropriate level of risk. We would never go into speculative greenfield infrastructure projects.

Q: Is there any difference between the risk and return appetites of your private and public founding members of PIP?
There shouldn’t be any difference in reality. We are attempting to provide a particular type of investment and asset class to a portfolio. The only difference really is that most defined benefit schemes are closed to new entrants and are going through a derisking process – aiming for a higher allocation to low risk assets. Public sector funds are still open and have a positive cash flow but even they are looking to reduce risk and volatility.

Q: What can local authority pension schemes bring as founding members?
There are lots of debates about local investment – local authorities have good ideas about their localities and we can partner with them to do local investment. The local authority’s backing gives a real validation that the schemes are not just vanity projects. And if they are owned by a council then they are not the sort of scheme that is likely to be auctioned off by advisers in the city.

Q: London Pension Fund Authority was a founding member but pulled out of PIP? What happened?
Essentially, it just decided to work with Lancashire County Pension Fund. We are still friends, though. LPFA and Manchester could come up with a project and we could get involved.  We would only be too pleased to look at stuff. And if we find a scheme that is too big for PIP we would talk to LPFA and Lancashire. There is also the emerging London CIV – these emerging groupings are good for the sector as a whole.

Share

You may also like...

  • 2022 LGPS valuations: options, opportunities and objectives 31st Mar, 2022
  • LGPS annual reports: there must be a better way 10th Feb, 2022
  • Mike Thatcher: constructing a new role for local government 27th Jan, 2022
  • LGPS: Top stories 2021 15th Dec, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 3 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 3 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 3 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 4 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 4 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 4 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 5 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Greece Update: 48 hours to satisfy creditors
  • Next story Councils negotiate new model to finance housing

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares