• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: LGPS deficits are “all important”, but are they really what they seem?

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in LGPS
  • — 28 Jul, 2015

For a long while I have had a bee in my bonnet about the reporting of pension funds. There are a number of aspects that it seems to me are troubling.

First of all, people talk about public sector pensions as if they are all the same. There are actually 54 different public sector pension funds and they are run in one of three ways; they are either a funded scheme, a notional scheme or pay as you go.

In the dim and distant past when money was plentiful and the public sector world large and peaceful, certain parts adopted pay as you go schemes. The best example of this was the police service.

As time went on, and the number of pensioners grew, the burden on police authorities became unsustainable.

At one point, some 10 years ago, I remember a chief constable of one force saying that unless the funding system changed in five years he would stop policing and become a pensions administering authority. Central government has had to help.

Teachers have a notional fund where the sums are kept aside, but not actually invested, and the fund management is a book exercise.

The LGPS is a good example of a funded scheme and, despite all the noise, remains an excellent vehicle for dealing with pensions.

The current deficit quoted for all 89 funds in LGPS is £47bn. And indeed, when the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) polled its members the deficit emerged as a major concern. Funds are valued regularly in a thoroughly scientific way by actuaries and I have no issues with that.

However, there is a question mark over how much the deficit figures can be relied upon. Factors such as the likely level of pay increases chosen by actuaries, as well as the choice of discount rate, may vary considerably from what actually happens, and the actual returns achieved by fund managers.

I note in passing that most funds have a positive cash flow and even under the current regime many are 70-80% funded. Pension Funds are a long-term business and in reality I believe that the deficits will never reach those currently projected.

Interestingly, this is a time of change in the local government pension world. By now all authorities will have set up their independent pension boards with a governance and scrutiny role.

Two other issues were singled out in the NAPF poll by respondents for these new bodies. There is uncertainty about their role and a challenge in ensuring members are properly trained.

As a chair of two of these boards I disagree that there is uncertainty about the role. This is clearly defined, but it will be interesting to see how effective the boards will be in scrutinising costs, governance, administrative performance etc. At present although all authorities have met statutory requirements some are going for the minimum necessary and that is a shame because this is a real opportunity to moves things forward.

There are additional issues. There is an almost obsessional interest in the costs of investment management met by the funds, in particular, how much of this cost is in hidden transactional charges and whether costs are being inflated by unnecessary transactions.

I have to say that there is nothing new in all this, but I believe that the best interests of council tax payers is served by having Local Pension Fund Authorities to ensure that good value and good pension fund returns are achieved.

Pension funds have to accept that return and risk have a correlation and the new pension boards should be monitoring investment costs of the various managers. There is, of course, an argument that above normal performance is relatively worth paying for, but governance is the key to keeping costs in check.

In the long term though the calculation and dealing with the deficit is all important. I would urge some detailed research on this.

It does not serve council tax payers well to fund deficits unnecessarily when the money could have been used on services. This is a priority and it is my personal belief that the £47bn is not a real figure and that we could do better.

Share

You may also like...

  • CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards: Deadline extended 29th Apr, 2021
  • Inflation and the LGPS 19th Jun, 2022
  • Cryptocurrencies: Are they an asset class for LGPS funds? 6th Jul, 2021
  • LGPS: Top stories 2021 15th Dec, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Former derivatives trader ‘deeply uncomfortable’ over LOBOs
  • Next story David Green: Dispatching with LOBOs

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares