• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Trevor Castledine: The challenges of pension pooling

0
  • by Guest
  • in LGPS
  • — 8 Aug, 2016
Photo: David J, Flickr

Photo: David J, Flickr

NEW LGPS Quarterly Briefing
REGISTER for our FREE quarterly email covering LGPS interviews, guest opinion pieces, investment analysis and news roundups. First edition coming January 2017.  

With pooling submissions all in, the industry is now awaiting HM Treasury’s response. This shouldn’t mean, however, that pools cease working on how to put their plans into practice.

Whilst size and investment have led the headlines, governance is one of the most important factors to get right.

This is difficult: Where to strike the balance between maintenance of sovereignty for administrating authorities and that of delegated authority within individual pools? Ultimately, if pooling is to be effective, there needs to be a strong focus on the topic of control and effective delegation.

In our case – the Local Pensions Partnership (LPP) – we understood early that getting the governance right for our founder shareholders was the first key feature.

Crucially, we set out to create a pensions service organisation in much the same way as global leaders like the Dutch fund, PGGM. This meant that our activities were focused on building an offering that had the right governance frameworks in place; not just how we could combine assets.

This common purpose was vital in bringing officers, councillors and board members together and aligning interests. It has also meant that there’s now a good understanding between Lancashire County Council and the London Pensions Fund Authority of the need to allow LPP to flourish on its own.

Testing times

Following our launch date in April, there has been an opportunity to test how this works.

All parties are still getting used to their new roles and that transition will take time. However, the relationships set up in the early days of the partnership remain extremely positive with a will to address issues as they arise.

Of course, in moving from a public sector to a group company structure there are clearly challenges – many being just day-to-day – which funds may not yet have considered.

For example, from the outset LPP staff were saying: “We used to do this in LCPF/LPFA” or “What is LPP’s policy or process on…?”. Still, we believe that by relying on (and training) internal resource rather than external advisers, it sets us up strongly for future growth, as we develop experience in-house.

Many pools are inheriting strong in-house investment teams. However, the increased volume of work and the additional governance burden that Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) regulation will bring will test us all.

Certainly, we, like many others, are looking at our resources to be comfortable that we have the breadth and depth of skills required.

Finally, more stringent requirements about risk and compliance monitoring and separation of responsibilities come into play with FCA regulation. Pools will be faced with the need to boost existing capabilities or even create new teams from scratch as we have found necessary.

Appropriate monitoring and reporting is needed to build and maintain the trust required for effective delegation as well as to satisfy the ongoing responsibility of each authority.

Significant enhancement of existing systems in order to keep track of each participant’s assets and performance is likely to be necessary and decisions will need to be made about consolidation of custodians.

Striking the balance between effective controls and the creation of another level of bureaucracy is tricky in practice.

However, it brings a huge governance uplift. New stakeholders, new boards, processes, policies and procedures, whilst challenging, are worth the journey; as the outcomes for members and employers will be far stronger.

Cost savings

Along with governance, performance must be considered. Whilst the headlines are trumpeting cost savings as a key motivator for the whole pooling initiative the focus should really be on after-cost returns and risk levels. But demonstrating cost savings is, of course, necessary.

So, what’s the plan? Consolidate external managers? Bring investment teams in house?  Move from active to passive management?

All of these options could be adopted by funds and all bring implications way beyond those of a simple headline fee reduction.

The regret risk, in terms of reduced performance, is high and all decisions will be judged with the benefit of 20:20 hindsight. This makes a clear plan and a well documented decision making process important.

More challenging is how to actually track and report savings. Some asset classes typically have lower cost bases than others.

For example, direct lending is typically some tens of basis points per annum more expensive to access than traditional fixed income.

However, many funds may well be increasing allocations to direct lending for perfectly sensible portfolio construction and yield-seeking reasons. So, costs will go up, even if savings, versus managers’ “rate card” fees, are achieved.

The costs tail should not be wagging the investment performance dog. Pools will no doubt be compared to each other based purely on costs, whether we like it or not. Changes in asset allocation might give the illusion of cost saving where none has actually been achieved.

Consistency should be important to all pools. Should savings be reported, therefore, based on a static portfolio? If so, should that be the current portfolio, the pool’s own target or some nominal “default” portfolio? Should the focus be on absolute fee levels (perhaps by asset class) rather than savings achieved?

Implementation challenges

The simple phrase “pooling assets” hides immeasurable complexity. Different asset classes suit different pooling solutions.

Some assets, like listed equities, are easily transferrable and have transparent, reliable values, whilst this is less true for other asset types.

There are transition costs as well as the risk of inadvertently transferring value. How will new investments be allocated between pool members? What about undrawn commitments to closed-end funds, either legacy ones or new ones? How to manage differing treasury and cash flow needs?

We are all at different stages of this journey and there will be many more questions over the coming months.

Lancashire County Pension Fund and LPFA started this process together several years before the government mandate and our asset and liability management model is now up and running. Whilst all pools have varying models, many of the questions faced are similar. What is important is that we are all reaching for the same goal and sharing our learnings.

 

Trevor Castledine

Trevor Castledine

Trevor Castledine is deputy chief investment officer at Local Pensions Partnership.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

 

 

 

 

Pensioner Photo (cropped): David J, Flickr.

 

Share

You may also like...

  • Pension power: beyond net zero 4th Feb, 2022
  • Room151 Roundtable: LGPS Valuations and Risk 2022 2nd Dec, 2021
  • Making sense of climate risk reporting for LGPS 2nd Mar, 2021
  • LGPS investing: how impact funds can contribute to net-zero ambitions 15th Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
    • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase
    • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 hours ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 4 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 6 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 1 week ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story News Round-up: Gilt yields, LGPS Central, EIB £300m loan, LA outsourcing boom
  • Next story James Bevan: Reflections on an interest rate cut

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares