• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Agent151: The DWP dictionary

1
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Resources
  • — 1 Sep, 2015

Lord Freud, the welfare reform minister, recently wrote an article extolling the virtues of ‘collaboration’. Agent 151 nearly spat out his cornflakes.

In a bold move by DWP, Lord Freud has announced that the meaning of the word ‘collaboration’ has been successfully redefined to fit better with its business model.

A spokesperson for the Oxford English Dictionary denied that the meaning had in fact been officially amended but warned that over time nearly all words take on new nuances and that some can, in fact, come to mean the exact opposite.

For example, the word ‘wicked’ can mean both ‘evil’ and ‘very good’; the word ‘peer’ can mean both ‘a person of equal status’ and ‘a member of the nobility’; and the word  ‘resign’ can mean both  ‘to quit’ and ‘to get a new contract’. DWP added that it also had plans for the words ‘successful’, ‘consultation’, ‘universal’, and ‘welfare’.

No, none of that is true, before you rush out and tweet it. But Lord Freud, minister for welfare reform, has been writing about the importance of collaboration, which is just as surprising.  “If you can garner support from the people implementing the change, your reform is more likely to succeed”, he declares in an article for Local Government Chronicle.

This is nothing short of a Damascene conversion, as there was no ambition to garner support from councils in the early stages of the universal credit programme.  Indeed, DWP’s track record on collaboration concerning universal credit has been nothing short of appalling.

It began with a top-down policy diktat. The welfare system had to be reformed and universal credit, in which councils would play no part, was the answer.

On that decision it is hard to find any trace at all of collaboration with other organisations, and especially councils.

Stephen Baker, chairman of the Local Government Delivery Council and chief executive of the Suffolk Coastal and Waveney District Councils, sums the problem up nicely: “…over the years councils have had to respond to various national initiatives which invariably start with a proposed solution.

“This typically results in either attempts to shoehorn in or adapt a ‘one size all solution’ with all the associated costs – the worst possible outcome for customers.”

After that uncompromising start, several decisions were made that had very significant consequences for councils.

The consultation responses on the localisation of council tax benefit all suggested keeping it as part of universal credit. This was ignored. Issues were raised about the Single Fraud Investigation Service. They were ignored.

The NAO’s early review of the universal credit programme was damning on many counts, but on the subject of collaboration recommended that: “The Department should set clear expectations about how interdependent programmes should work together both within the Department and across government.” In other words, the NAO found that DWP wasn’t collaborating effectively with anyone at all!

I can picture Lord Freud jumping up and down at this point, waving his arms. “What about the pathfinders!” he is saying. And he is right: the pathfinders turned out to be the best thing about the universal credit programme.

Through the pathfinders, which worked mainly because of local collaboration between councils and Job Centre Plus staff, many of the initial problems were ironed out.

But let’s be honest: at the time the pathfinders were established, no-one at DWP thought they were important. Huw Meredith, Local Authority Liaison, DWP UC Programme, recently admitted that if the DWP were to repeat the process of changing the welfare system they would recognise earlier the true delivery partner status of local government; implement co-production earlier; and aim to build greater confidence and transparency from the outset.

We should welcome Lord Freud’s acknowledgement of the importance of the role of councils in making universal credit work.

However, let’s not get carried away. As recently as July 2015, Ipsos Mori carried out research on behalf of DWP that found that ‘lack of clarity’ for councils about the timescales for universal credit was causing ‘uncertainty’, ‘preventing certain decisions being made’, and ‘hindering the amount of preparation that can be done’.

Somewhat hilariously, a DWP spokesperson said in response: “As this survey shows… we are working closely with [councils] to ensure this runs smoothly.”

Share

You may also like...

  • “Localism, localism, localism”, or simply time for better funding 19th Apr, 2021
  • Room151 launches Audit Committee Masterclass 28th Oct, 2021
  • CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards: Deadline extended 29th Apr, 2021
  • ‘Funding cuts have changed the scale, shape and scope of local government’ 31st Jan, 2022

1 Comment

  1. salford says:
    2015/09/04 at 10:34

    Highly enjoyable. Thank you Agent 151 !

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 21 hours ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 21 hours ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 7 days ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Newham’s special purpose vehicle, council expenditure, pay rises not certain, enterprise zone jobs boost
  • Next story Reserve cap plans face criticism

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK