• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Audit questions Aberdeen’s income generation record

0
  • by Jim Dunton
  • in 151 News · Resources
  • — 19 Feb, 2020

Aberdeen City Council has a patchy record of planning and monitoring its service-boosting income generation proposals – many of which fail to meet their budgeted targets, an internal audit report has found.

The report to members of the council’s audit, risk and scrutiny committee also warned that a focus on bottom-line budgets for functions risked “alternative actions” taking place in lieu of originally-agreed measures in a way that “may not be sustainable or achieve the intended outcomes”.

David Hughes, Aberdeen’s chief internal auditor, said the authority had set out “income generation opportunities” of £2.32m in 2017/18, an additional £1.77m the following year and a further £1.64m in 2019/20 as part of efforts to support service delivery amid rising costs.

But he said not all income-generation proposals had been “sufficiently clear” and noted there was only “limited evidence” of planning in advance for the delivery of projects to raise additional income.

“The objective of this audit was to provide assurance that budgeted income generation is based on robust assumptions and is being realised,” he said.

“This has not always been the case.”

He continued: “Whilst budgets are regularly monitored, there has been no specific monitoring of detailed options in 2019/20.”

The report said that in-year changes to Aberdeen’s budget amounting to £11.36m had been agreed by the authority’s corporate management team in 2017/18, including the reversal of some savings and income-generation options agreed by the council earlier in the year.

It added that “further post-budget adjustments” had been made in 2018/19 relating to restructuring and the allocation of procurement savings.

Hughes’ report said that while committees had been advised that virements had been made in quarterly financial statements, councillors had not been provided with enough detail or given the option of reinstating earlier savings plans or income generation options.

“These changes were insufficiently transparent, and represent a breach of financial regulations in respect of budget virements,” he said.

Hughes said that plans and project teams were in place for only two of four agreed new revenue streams or savings programmes introduced for the current year that were selected for internal audit.

He added that two of six previous years’ options had not progressed, “indicating they had also not been through rigorous planning and project-management in order to deliver the anticipated outcomes”.

Hughes said that in some cases prudent estimates had been calculated based on officers’ knowledge of the potential market.

“In others it was not clear that the viability of the option had been fully explored in advance,” he said.

“Supporting calculations were only available for four out of the 10 options. For the remainder, officers charged with their delivery were unclear of the basis for the budget adjustment due to service and staff changes, or were otherwise unable to provide supporting detail.”

The report said advertising and sponsorship income was one area where Aberdeen had consistently fallen short of targets.

It said an anticipated £180,000 in sponsorship income had been incorporated into the council’s 2018/19 budget – on top of £150,000 to be generated from advertising and £140,000 from the sponsorship of roundabouts.

However, the audit report said the additional £180,000 was not achieved and as of June last year income of just £26,000 was recorded.

It said that an advertising and sponsorship strategy had yet to be produced and there was “no list of available assets (except for roundabouts) on which sponsorship could be placed”.

Elsewhere the report pointed to an “absence of plans” for how the council’s building standards team would achieve its target of generating an additional £50,000 in 2019/2020 income following the end of a contract with another local authority that had contributed to the target in previous years.

The report also said that from 2017/18 onwards Aberdeen had targeted the collection of an additional £200,000 a year in council tax arrears through investment in additional staff.

It said that specific plans to demonstrate how additional income would be generated and monitoring to show how it had been were “not available”.

The report said that although council tax income increased between 2016/17 and 2017/18, it was not possible to separate any benefit from additional staff from other changes including growth in the tax base and reductions in available discounts. It noted that the collection rate for council-tax arrears did not change.

Hughes said Aberdeen’s finance function had put a new process in place for documenting plans for 2020/21 budget proposals.

“It will be implementing additional monitoring of delivery of milestones for significant material budget options (those in excess of £250,000),” his report said.

Share

You may also like...

  • Room151 launches survey on IFRS 9 override and MRP impact 9th May, 2022
  • Liability benchmark ‘should not be mandatory’ 29th Apr, 2022
  • Councils & carbon: COP26 an opportunity to confront climate change at a local level 28th Oct, 2021
  • What has been happening to the outlook for UK bank rate? 26th Oct, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Richard Harbord: Cannock Chase reveals the risks in business rates appeals
  • Next story Sponsored Q&A: Funding Circle’s Sachin Patel on investing in SME loans

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares