• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Buying back all PFI contracts won’t guarantee value for money, say experts

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Resources
  • — 28 Sep, 2017

Photo: Rwendland CC BY-SA 4.0, Link

Shadow chancellor John McDonnell’s plans to take Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contracts back into the public sector would not always provide councils with value for money, according to sector experts.

In a speech to the Labour Party conference this week, McDonnell said that PFI has racked up huge costs for taxpayers while handing out enormous profits to the private sector.

However, an adviser on a 2014 deal which saw a health trust borrow cash from a local authority to buy itself out of a PFI contract, said that taking a blanket approach could end up costing more.

Phil Lobb, lead partner for UK Public Sector Health at consultancy Deloitte, said: “The key point is the value for money test. Compensation for terminating these contracts would rarely represent value for money on PFI deals funded by bonds. Bank-funded projects might be slightly simpler.”

Three years ago, Lobb worked on a deal in which Northumberland County Council loaned £100m to Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust to exit a PFI covering two hospitals.

He said: “In our case, we demonstrated it would be value for money, but you certainly can’t say it would be possible on all projects.”

He said that one scenario where buying out PFI deals could make financial sense is where annual increases in unitary payments to PFI providers are based on a historically high rate of annual interest.

But council accountancy expert Stephen Sheen said discussions over interest payments due could be tricky.

“The government covers the minimum revenue provision on the original capital costs under PFI plus interest. But it is often a notional calculation. Unless there was an agreed fixed rate of interest, it could be a tricky conversation.”

Lobb also said that local government PFI deals had specific factors—absent from central government deals—which could affect the value for money calculation.

He said: “A council thinking of terminating a contract might save some money but lose the PFI credits which the government pays it. Why would you do it and end up in no better position?”

Misunderstood

Other experts voiced concerns that the benefits of PFI deals to the public sector are widely misunderstood.

Andrew Edkins, director of the Bartlett Institute of Real Estate at University College London, told Room151: “The PFI contracts might cost a bit more than traditional public sector funding, but the private sector is taking the risk off the hands of the public sector. They are contractually obliged to provide services to a set standard. Under traditional funding models, services tend to deteriorate because those budgets are an easy target for cuts.”

He said that research carried out by his department showed that PFI deals provided better service levels at a lower cost than through traditional funding.

It is uncertain that a public buy-back of PFI contracts would save money, according to Mark Pickering, director at treasury adviser Arlingclose.  He said: “It could go either way. There could be savings on the debt financing side, since government can borrow cheaper than banks, even allowing for an early redemption premium, but there may be extra costs on the service provision side as some of the private sector efficiencies within the contracts may be lost.”

Meanwhile, Bronwyn Maddox, director at the Institute for Government, said: “Breaking PFI contracts is legally difficult and expensive.

“It is not clear from Corbyn’s speech that Labour has a plan for handling this process, or for managing the organisations and contracts once they are back in public hands.”

The day after McDonnell’s speech, shadow health secretary Jon Ashworth rowed back from McDonnell’s assertion to conference delegates that all PFIs would be taken back into public hands.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “We need to look at every single PFI contract and see if we can renegotiate them and get a better deal for the taxpayer.

“This could take some time. It is not a thing that happens overnight.”

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Room151 launches survey on IFRS 9 override and MRP impact 9th May, 2022
  • Stewardship of public funds: the way forward 18th Feb, 2022
  • CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards: Deadline extended 29th Apr, 2021
  • Impact Awards launch to celebrate finance teams 25th Mar, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
    • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase
    • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 6 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 1 week ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’:The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. @London_CIV room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: Watford Borough Council & Three Rivers District Council, various roles:       Technical Accountant Career Grade: We are looking for a motivated team player to join our Finance Department. The post holder will gain experience across these… dlvr.it/SSWN8f

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story News Roundup: Investment adviser probe, property spending list, prevention precept, LGPS pool’s new chief
  • Next story Councils launch property investment schemes with £200m of PWLB money

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK