• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Business rates reform raises uncertainty for council revenues

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Resources
  • — 8 Oct, 2015
Business zone: Westfield, London

Business zone: Westfield, London

Uncertainty hangs over the fate of councils suffering from low economic growth in the wake of the announcement from the chancellor George Osborne that councils will be allowed to keep 100% of business rates.

In a speech to the Conservative Party conference on Monday, the chancellor announced the government would relinquish its half of business rates income and abolish the revenue support grant.

A spokesperson for the Department of Communities and Local Government committed to a redistribution mechanism to protect councils with low or negative business rate growth – but would not be more specific.

Guy Ware, interim director of finance, performance and procurement at London Councils, told Room151:  “Individual councils won’t keep all the rates they collect; there will be a redistribution system that limits the potential rewards from business growth.

“A host of detailed issues needs resolving – but we should seize the opportunity to help develop solutions that work.”

Currently, a system of “top-ups” and “tariffs” caps the amount that councils can gain or lose from business rate growth retention.

Straight after the speech, a Conservative Party source told Room151  that this system would be retained in some form. However, despite repeated requests, the Department for Communities and Local Government was unable to confirm this, saying that it was just one idea under consideration for a redistribution mechanism.

Ed Cox, director of think tank IPPR North, called on the Treasury to be clearer about how low growth areas would be protected.

He said: “Unless we retain some redistributive mechanism, there is a significant risk it will starve poorer areas of crucial support and allow wealthier ones to collect all the riches.”

Paul Martin, Solace spokesperson for local government finance and chief executive of the London Borough of Wandsworth, said: “Great care will need to be taken over the detail of the transition. In particular, during a period of sharp reductions in grant, it will be essential to ensure that no local authority finds itself in a more adverse financial situation as a consequence of this change. As with all policy, it will be as good as its implementation.”

What is known at this stage, however, is that the system will be phased in up to 2020, and that the Uniform Business Rate will be abolished. Councils outside combined authorities will be allowed to cut – but not raise – business rates, while city regions with elected mayors will be allowed to increase rates by 2p in the pound for specific infrastructure projects.

Melanie Leech, chief executive of the British Property Federation, warned that the reforms could even exacerbate inequality between richer and poorer areas.

She said: “It will be imperative for Treasury to engage with industry to ensure that this does not lead to a proliferation of different rates of tax across the country, which businesses will find difficult to negotiate and which could lead to uneven growth across the country.”

Osborne said that in return for being able to keep business rate income, councils would be expected to take on more duties, but again the details remain shrouded in mystery.

Cllr Gary Porter, chairman of the Local Government Association, welcomed Osborne’s announcement, but said that there was a flipside because councils would now be liable for 100% of business rate refunds.

“This makes reform of the appeals system even more urgent to protect councils from the growing and costly risk and appeals and ensure businesses are happy with what they pay,” he said.

Chris Shepherd, director at 31ten Consulting, is an expert on tax incremental finance (TIF) funding, which relies on funding infrastructure from borrowing against expected business rates income.

He said: “The impact on TIF is unclear. By councils having greater control over business rates one could argue that this has the impact of increased certainty, but on the other hand now investment through a TIF becomes a decision that has to be made in the context of wider funding and service investment decisions, for example children’s budgets and investment in adult care.

“TIFs were attractive because they sat outside these service level decisions, being essentially a growth tool.

“It would be a brave finance director who would reduce capital investment in core services whilst investing on the premise that this new investment would create growth.

“However, conversely this could have the impact of making the TIF tool a bit sharper, with the risk of a failing TIF reducing.”

Photo (cropped): Herry Lawford, Flickr.

Share

You may also like...

  • Impact Awards: A week to go before deadline 22nd Apr, 2021
  • 151 officers must remain at the top table 22nd Jun, 2021
  • What has been happening to the outlook for UK bank rate? 26th Oct, 2021
  • Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results? 19th Jan, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
    • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override
    • EAPF criticised for water company investments
    • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy
    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 5 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 6 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 6 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story LGPS: Chancellor’s regional pooling questioned
  • Next story Agent151: Bad behaviour

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares