• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Business rates reform: View from the experts

0
  • by Editor
  • in Resources
  • — 8 Oct, 2015

Version 2The chancellor’s statement on business rates has caused a stir in local government. Speaking at the Conservative Party Conference George Osborne revealed new reforms allowing local authorities  to retain their business rates revenues. Councils will also be allowed to vary the levy to compete for business. A third element in the changes will allow some councils to raise the rate level to pay for infra structure projects.

The changes would place the £26bn raised from rates back in the control of local government. Currently only 50% of rates raised from business is distributed back to local authorities with the rest retained by central government.

But reaction has been varied. Room151 invited comment from a range of local government finance experts.

 

Guy Ware,
Interim director of finance, performance and procurement at London Councils

“We asked for it, and the chancellor’s statement is to be welcomed. Of course, the devil will be in the detail. Isn’t it always?

“Individual councils won’t keep all the rates they collect; there will be a redistribution system that limits the potential rewards from business growth. A host of detailed issues needs resolving – but we should seize the opportunity to help develop solutions that work.

“The chancellor also announced the death of “core funding”. It was dead already: on current plans Revenue Support Grant would disappear by 2020, and business rates will raise around £11bn more than we would be allowed to spend – which is exactly why the chancellor is looking to give us ‘additional responsibilities’.

“Some interesting questions follow: Which transfers can best ‘soak up’ the surplus? How might that support devolution proposals across the country? And might fixing this bit of the machinery open the door for more fundamental fiscal reform?”

Chris Buss
Director of finance and deputy chief executive, London Borough of Wandsworth.

“The announcement by the chancellor localising business rates, together with the extra responsibilities promised, should come as no surprise.

“It was clear, by projecting the unprotected reduction in government expenditure to 2020 there was no longer any cash for general grant and, by then, rates income will be at a level where they had to be spent on something extra.

“As many other commentators will say, the devil is in the detail and it will be particularly interesting to see how it works out for areas, such as London, where there are areas like the City and Westminster with major surpluses on business rates and others, currently in receipt of major top ups.

“Some form of scheme will be required to deal with this otherwise when this is added to the next round of cuts, as RSG goes, we will be looking at an English local authority with the finances of Detroit.”

Paul Woods
Chief finance officer, North East Combined Authority

“This year, councils estimate that £23bn of rates is collectable.  Of this £11.5bn is paid to central government which, with inflation and growth, councils as a whole would be able to keep.

“Core Revenue Support Grant of  £9.5bn, less spending review cuts, would end.   To deliver austerity savings, Treasury would need to cut other funding (such as New Homes Bonus and public health funding) and transfer additional responsibilities to local government to be funded from business rates.

“Business rates are unevenly distributed around the country (e.g. Westminster council generates £1.8bn, over fifty times that of some of the poorest councils) and bear little relation to the demands on councils to provide statutory services.

“The current grant system also compensates for inequality of councils tax base including the compensation for council tax exemption for student housing.

“So any effective and fair redistribution adjustment will need to take account of the need to equalise for differences in business rates and council tax base earning potential.  If it is does not, then fears that this change will further widen the funding gap between resources and service demand pressures in rich and poor areas would become a reality.”

 

Stephen Fitzgerald
Local government finance consultant

“The government views its policy on business rates as a considerable success.  Having introduced localisation in part, the chancellor’s latest announcement means they are now going the whole way.

“This is something the representatives of local government have been arguing for, at the national level, for some years.

“Those local authorities in areas with a high business rate base, and potential for further growth, will be celebrating. However, for councils with a low business rate tax base and high reliance on revenue support grant the position looks difficult.

“Essentially, we are seeing the final act in a move away from a ‘needs based’, formula driven, local government finance system, to one based on rewarding economic prosperity.

“It remains to be seen how resource equalisation fits into this picture, which will be made clearer when announcements on the detail are made.

“The government will need to think carefully about its equalisation approach so that the new arrangements will not simply mean that the rich get richer and the poor become poorer.”

 

Frank Wilson,
Strategic director for resources at West Oxfordshire District Council and Cotswold District Council

“The announcement made by the chancellor that he will move to fully relinquish the Treasury’s grip on business rates is a welcome step in the devolution of local government finance.

“Indeed, the abolition of the levy, and ability to keep 100% of business rates above the baseline, formed the cornerstone of a number of devolution proposals so, by agreeing this upfront, the chancellor has already signalled his intention to give councils one of the big levers of growth.

“Of course, we all recognise that giving us the full business rates take comes at a price. The DCLG portion was merely recycled back to us via the RSG system, so this goes too as part of the deal. There will be no new money – at least initially.

“Having lived through the birth of the current retention of business growth system we know broadly how a mechanism will be devised to get us to a ‘fair’ starting point with a system of tariffs and top up’s – but with the abolition of the levy without the loss of the safety net this part seems a positive step.

“The start up point sounds like it will be another zero sum game – there will be winners and losers from where we stand now – but thereafter it seems that, subject to seeing the detail (where the devil will be), winner takes it all.

“Personally I think this is right. The seven years between the start of the new system and reset in 2020 seemed too short. If we really want to generate business growth with bold decisions around infrastructure we need to be able to think long-term financing and seven years is woefully inadequate in this respect. This announcement seems to signal no reset in the future, but time will tell, along with any implications it has for the existing reset.

“The spending review was going to be interesting anyway – it just got a whole lot more interesting.”

Richard Harbord
A local government consultant and former chief executive of Boston Council

“The Chancellor’s speech had very little detail and we will need to wait full comment can be made. It is a re-run of Eric Pickles speech to the Local Government Association when he said 100% of rates would be retained by 2017-18.

“There are a number of questions. There is reference to continuing tariffs and top ups, but no clues as to how that will be financed. No detail of the five-year transition or what happens to areas that do not have growth. No clue as to how the central list will be dealt with. This is very important as it is so large. It should be apportioned between authorities, not go to the centre.

“Osborne said it would be fiscally neutral so Whitehall Grants would cease. No clue as to the grants would go other than the block grant, which is fading away now. If that is not enough, new duties will be transferred. Might this be police or public health?  The speech showed no understanding of the situation in two tier authorities.”

Photo (cropped): Gareth Milner, Flickr

Share

You may also like...

  • Loans: The legal checklist for supporting enterprise 24th Sep, 2021
  • What’s the benefit of using the PSAA? 17th Aug, 2021
  • ‘Funding cuts have changed the scale, shape and scope of local government’ 31st Jan, 2022
  • What lies ahead for UK markets? 2nd Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 20 hours ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 23 hours ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 2 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 3 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 4 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 7 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 1 week ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story South West pension funds pursue CIV
  • Next story LGPS: Chancellor’s regional pooling questioned

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares