• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Chris Buss: 151s and the sliding scale of development risk

0
  • by Guest
  • in Chris Buss · Development · Resources
  • — 11 Apr, 2016

Risk aversion in the public sector is shifting. But each model of housing development presents it own particular kind of challenge. Chris Buss runs through the options.

Building capital

Building capital

How much of a risk taker are you? By nature I’m naturally cautious, particularly with money – even more so when it’s not mine. Thus, I’m not one that would by nature follow the maxim of you need to “speculate to accumulate”.

That’s not to say that I don’t believe you need to invest to make a return, it’s just at what point does the nature of the investment become too risky, even if the promised, or supposed, reward is superficially attractive.

For much of my career in local government the public sector has become risk averse, largely to avoid, in part, public opprobrium when things go wrong, as it does spectacularly on occasion. However, I sense that this risk aversion is now changing.

In part this is due to the need to seek greater returns to balance reductions in direct government funding, or the indirect impact of government actions such as rent reductions.

But in part it’s also a reaction to the greater commercialisation of the public sector, with the sector taking the view: “Why should the private sector get all the upside (or profit)?”  One area in particular this is happening is in the provision of new housing.

Downturns and reform

Since the early 1980s the traditional housing delivery model has been that a local authority might assist a developer by selling land to them or, on occasion, assist them to acquire land. But the risk of development, and conversely the reward, for selling was a matter for the private sector not a council.

For those of us of mature years we can think back to the early 1990s when a number of large developers were financially burnt by the collapse in the property market. This reaffirmed in our consciousness that, whilst the property market may look like a one-way bet, and despite the trend of ever rising prices, it’s a fact that prices do go down as well as up in the short and medium term.

And it’s a fact that no one can predict the next down turn.  In addition, there’s the risk of reforms imposed by government such as recent rule changes on stamp duty which might impact returns.

Sliding scale

So what’s a reasonable level of risk with regard to housing for a council to take?

At one end of the scale we can have a council as the deliverer of council homes – a phrase that most people understand rather than the Orwellian nonsense of what is an affordable home.

A council would normally own the site, demolish what’s there at present (often if it’s a small scale development which involves converting redundant store sheds, garages or drying areas), get a scheme designed and then get a builder to build it with a council keeping ownership of the new housing.

Relatively risk-free you might think, until you find that the site surveys didn’t pick up on some contaminated ground, or sewer, which increases build costs to such an extent that viability becomes an issue – and that’s before the government changes the sums further by forcing a rent cut leaving such a scheme with a funding shortfall.  Even the simplest of schemes is not risk free.

As we move up the scale, in terms of both size and diversity of scheme, life becomes riskier, but potentially more rewarding for those willing to take the risk, as we come to the more typical development model.

In exchange for additional or reprovided social housing – often vested with a registered social landlord rather than a council – a developer builds out the private housing and keeps the sales proceeds.  In this scenario (which I’ve over simplified for reasons of space) the risk rests with the developer, but then so does the reward. The primary risk the council faces is the scheme not being built due to market conditions, and a potentially blighted site in a down turn.

Traditionally, local authorities sold land with a “light touch” in terms of planning, allowing the developer to negotiate a consent with the planning department and capturing all the value that crystallises when planning is granted.

However, by investing in planning briefs or full planning permissions, councils can capture all the uplift created by planning permission for itself, thus increasing capital receipts.

Whilst this requires up front revenue costs to secure planning permission, this is more than covered by increased value and, in many cases, the costs can be recovered (as revenue) as a condition of sale.

Moving up the scale we come to the joint venture where both a council and the developer pool risk and reward.

The extent to which this happens will vary depending on the nature of the scheme, the level of investment being pooled and a wide range of other factors.

Clearly a council is taking more risk in this scenario, but hopes to take some of the reward that would otherwise go to the private sector. The joint venture option will often require up front investment from a council which can be at risk.

The far end of the scale is where a council provides both the new council housing and, often through an owned vehicle, funds the council housing through building for sale private units.

This is effectively taking the developers on at their own game, hoping the council can read the market as well as the developers and be able to sell at the right price to cover the build, marketing and finance risks involved in the overall project.

Thresholds

I’m aware of local authorities being involved in housing development at various stages along this sliding scale of risk, and it’s clearly for each authority to decide its own risk appetite, almost on a project by project basis.

There’s no right or wrong answer as each of us will have our own risk threshold and level of expertise available to justify that risk threshold.

However, for those tempted to go for the higher risk thresholds, and at the risk of teaching you to suck eggs, make sure you do the due diligence and don’t assume that housing is a one way bet in terms of values.  Remember, at the end of the day no one loves a section 151 officer who loses the investment capital.

Remember, If it goes wrong it won’t be councillors who will be looking to carry the can. It will land fairly, or otherwise, on your desk.

Chris Buss is  finance director and deputy chief executive at Wandsworth Borough Council.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • CFO secrets: Revisiting ‘purpose’ helps ensure your finance function is fit for the job 11 Sep, 2020
  • Chris Buss: 100% business rates retention is a Meccano set without a spanner Chris Buss: 100% business rates retention is a Meccano set without a spanner 6 Mar, 2017
  • Officer outsourcing could save a small fortune Officer outsourcing could save a small fortune 17 Jul, 2013
  • Chris Buss: 151 officers, strategic development and local skills – part two Chris Buss: 151 officers, strategic development and local skills – part two 10 Mar, 2015

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results?: The government has issued a green paper on reforming procurement rules. Helen Randall and Rebecca Rees examine the proposals and argue they may not go far enough. The Cabinet… dlvr.it/Rqtw6T pic.twitter.com/9GiVTkL08U

    Room151 7 days ago

    The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk: Sponsored article: Lauren Sewell examines the prospects for long-term borrowing as Brexit settles and vaccines are deployed against Covid-19. On the 9th October 2019 Whitehall sent… dlvr.it/RqZXCr pic.twitter.com/PzgOZOGQ0k

    Room151 7 days ago

    ESG in liquidity: Sponsored article: Gavin Haywood looks at the integration of ESG in Federated Hermes’ money market funds. Federated Hermes has over 300 public sector clients invested in our AAA rated money[...] dlvr.it/RqZX5f pic.twitter.com/E87sBXsay8

    Room151 1 week ago

    New realities of investing cash and liquidity: “What to do now?”: Sponsored article: Brian Buck looks at the “unique challenge” for cash management strategies. As investors assess the ongoing impact of the pandemic on their business, levels of cash and… dlvr.it/RqVbk9 pic.twitter.com/ZElVASmEUV

    Room151 1 week ago

    Extra finance promised by the government receives a broad welcome: Sponsored article: The financial pressures facing local authorities this year continue to pose challenges for council treasurers. While the launch of the UK’s Covid-19 vaccination… dlvr.it/RqTzTF pic.twitter.com/HCjH0pyHR5

    Room151 1 week ago

    A savvy approach to managing your cash: Sponsored article: Caroline Hedges examines the need for active cash management to achieve a higher than average return. Last year saw the already mountainous pile of negative-yielding debt around the[...] dlvr.it/RqTzMK pic.twitter.com/uP0RQYTJLt

    Room151 1 week ago

    Putting alternatives at the heart of multi-asset portfolios: Sponsored article: Nick Edwardson looks at the assets that provide the “most attractive opportunities”. We believe that asset allocation is the primary driver of investment returns and that the… dlvr.it/RqQ2Qt pic.twitter.com/WLBzvRRRUQ

    Room151 1 week ago

    Thriving in the pandemic: Avoiding the stragglers: Sponsored article: George Crowdy looks at the sectors providing opportunities for sustainable investment. Throughout much of 2020, we talked about why sustainable investing has thrived in the pandemic,… dlvr.it/RqQ2NQ pic.twitter.com/dxiPWKFsPl

    Room151 1 week ago

    The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark: Sponsored article: Amy Browne examines the importance of investing in mental health in the workplace. We are living through a public health emergency in more ways than one. Physical health[...] dlvr.it/RqQ2Jx pic.twitter.com/o6yRSCX3oF

    Room151 1 week ago

    Brexit: What the EU trade deal means for the UK economy: Sponsored article: Hetal Mehta looks at the impact of Brexit on economic prospects. Four and a half years after voting to leave the EU, on Christmas Eve the UK finally[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDt pic.twitter.com/No62srfE8h

    Room151 1 week ago

    Cash dethroned: The quest for liquid yield: Sponsored article: Peter Hunt and George Carne ask how treasury departments can balance the need for yield and liquidity. The massive stimulus and waves of liquidity provided by central banks[...] dlvr.it/RqLBDj pic.twitter.com/05g6Zhu1kU

    Room151 1 week ago

    Richard Harbord: Delayed “capital determinations” make section 25 opinions a new crunch point: The severe pressure on local government budgets now means section 151 officers confront a tricky call on  whether they can make a judgement on the robustness… dlvr.it/RqLBDV pic.twitter.com/vTAbDKFzkI

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB Consultation: Analysis straight from Dickens: Helen Radall and Paul McDermott present a legal examination of the new PWLB borrowing rules as Charles Dickens might have imagined it. Free and easy PWLB (“Marley” to his friends)[...] dlvr.it/RnmwLq pic.twitter.com/yFxcPrQqEG

    Room151 1 month ago

    Room151’s top stories from a momentous year: 2020 was the year in which local government grappled with Covid-19, funding strains, controversy over borrowing rules and the threat of financial collapse. It has been an exhausting and historic[...] dlvr.it/RnlpZg pic.twitter.com/g3myNyox6J

    Room151 1 month ago

    Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning: Many will rush to erase 2020 from their memories but, writes Tracy Bingham, there were also many lessons about finance teams, strategic planning and leadership. 2020: A year we’d… dlvr.it/RnlpY2 pic.twitter.com/m7G1krrtCu

    Room151 1 month ago

    Settlement must address ‘precarious’ local government finances: Dan Bates crosses his fingers for “no nasty surprises” in this week’s funding settlement but argues the “bigger prize” is post-Covid financial certainty. Thursday (17 December) should be the… dlvr.it/Rnj9dG pic.twitter.com/KLKjjuBqJE

    Room151 1 month ago

    PWLB consultation: Big change on the way but there are ‘grey areas’ and opportunities: The consultation on PWLB borrowing has concluded creating a new landscape for funding property acquisition. Our experts look at the implications. Tracie Langley The… dlvr.it/RndRvJ pic.twitter.com/KEqXEBmEfq

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story News round-up: council tax rises, Swindon’s solar bond, PWLB fair value figures, Housing association merger talks
  • Next story Manchester Roundtable: the flight from banks, collaboration and best practice

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK