• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Contentious settlement aims to soften the blow of losing grants

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Resources
  • — 11 Feb, 2016

Communities secretary Greg Clark this week pulled a £525m rabbit out of the hat to soften the impact of proposed cuts to local authority grants. Meanwhile the settlement faces claims of political bias as well as questions over where the extra funding has come from.

In its first four-year settlement for councils, Clark announced a series of extra cash and tax raising freedoms in response to complaints about the speed of cuts outlined in December’s provisional settlement.

The package includes £150m transition fund aimed directed at county councils and rural districts whose revenue support grant had been earmarked for the sharpest initial reductions under the provisional proposals.

Communities secretary Greg Clark said: “Today’s settlement means every council will have, for the financial year ahead, at least the resources allocated by the provisional settlement.

“In addition, we will provide transitional funding for the first 2 years of the Spending Review period for councils as they move from dependence on central government grants to greater financial autonomy.”

The £525m funding increase over the provisional settlement is made up of:

  • £150m in transitional funding each year for 2016/17 and 2017/18 (£300m in total)
  • £25m in removing the tariff / top Up adjustment over 2017/18 and 2018/19
  • £91m in additional Rural Services Delivery Grant over 2016/17 and 2017/18
  • £109m in potential higher council tax increases for district councils over the four years

Calculations made show the biggest winners from the transition fund will be county councils in Surrey (£24m), Hampshire (£19m) Herts (£16m), Essex (£14m) and West Sussex (£12m).

The transition fund has provoked accusations of political bias from the Labour Party, with Labour’s local government spokesman Steve Reed saying that the government had engaged in a “blatant misuse of public money in a shameless attempt to buy votes and buy off Tory MPs”.

“The government is covering up where this money has come from and won’t explain why almost all of it is being handed to Tory councils just weeks before council elections across the country,” he said.

Labour analysis shows that £255 million of the transitional grant – 85% – has been allocated to Tory councils.

Lee Geraghty, deputy director of local government consultancy LG Futures said that the award was understandable.

He said: “The transition grant is a reflection that those councils did worst in the provisional settlement – they expected to be hit but not as hard.”

But Neil Benn, director of Pixel Financial Management, said: “In the original settlement, metropolitan and deprived areas were given shallower cuts than posher areas, but when you added in council tax, business rates and New Homes Bonus, everyone was positioned the same. However, now Clark has rowed half way back from his intention that everyone’s spending power should fall by the same amount.”

Local Government Association chairman Lord Porter said: “The LGA has been working hard with the Government on behalf of all councils – both publicly and privately – to highlight the financial challenges they face over the next few years.

“We are pleased it has listened to our fundamental call for new money to be found to smooth out funding reductions for some councils in 2016/17 and beyond without any other councils losing out further as a result.”

However, there was mystery over where the government had found the extra cash from, with Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy chief executive Rob Whiteman calling on ministers to “provide clarity over where the money is coming from to allay fears of more cuts elsewhere”.

Benn said that his calculations had identified a gap between the total awards to local authorities in the provisional settlement and figures in the Departmental Expenditure Limits announced in chancellor George Osborne’s Autumn Statement.

He said: “A cynical interpretation would be that they held a few million back and used money to give to mates after consultation.”

Geraghty also said that he had identified a gap in the original figures, but questioned whether this had been part of a political sleight of hand.

He said: “They got hammered on settlement day by the counties and shire districts. Now they are getting hammered by the metropolitan councils. It’s like a referee giving decisions against both sites – if Clark had just given the money from day one then neither side would have complained so much.”

Clark has given councils until 14 October to respond to the offer of a four-year settlement.
No other information on how the four-year offer would work was provided within the details of the final settlement.

There was no mention of any incentives or moves to mandate authorities to spend their reserves, which Clark has previously hinted would accompany a four year settlement.

Welcoming Clark’s announcement, Richard Harbord, former chief executive of Boston Borough Council, said: “The final settlement announced by the government will make the next two years a little less difficult.

“Many authorities will find it very difficult but overall local government should manage.”

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • ‘Funding cuts have changed the scale, shape and scope of local government’ 31st Jan, 2022
  • Will new public procurement rules offer the best commercial results? 19th Jan, 2021
  • 151 officers must remain at the top table 22nd Jun, 2021
  • “Localism, localism, localism”, or simply time for better funding 19th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 5 hours ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 10 hours ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 1 day ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 1 week ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 week ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story The return of negative subsidy
  • Next story News Round-up: Right to Buy, investment freedoms, outsourcing surge, tourist tax and money market funds

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares