• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

MPs reveal doubts about City Deal accountability

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Resources
  • — 12 Nov, 2015

The government has rejected accusations from a group of MPs that inadequate monitoring arrangements make it difficult to judge impact of City Deals.

Between 2012 and last year, the government signed 26 deals with cities outside of London to devolve spending and policy powers.

But this week, the Public Accounts Committee said that a failure to put in place monitoring and evaluation arrangements makes it hard to assess progress and compare approaches in different areas.

Committee chairman Meg Hillier, said: “Devolving power and responsibilities carries the risk of weakened accountability. The fact that the government cannot adequately explain where responsibility lies for the success or failure of City Deal programmes should therefore sound an alarm.”

She said a new round of devolution deals announced recently made it even more important to ensure that it was clear who should be held to account.

“Taxpayers must understand who is spending their money, how that money is allocated, and where responsibility lies if the system fails to deliver good value,” she said.

In a response, the Department for Communities and Local Government said: “Ministers have been repeatedly clear that devolution of greater powers requires clear accountability, including through directly-elected mayors responsible to local taxpayers.

“The committee is right to recognise that City Deals were the start of a revolutionary new way of working – putting an end to decades of centralisation – and we will ensure lessons learned can inform future devolution deals.”

A spokesman said that councils have to report back on their performance as agreed in individual deals and that individual government departments are responsible for monitoring and evaluating relevant projects.

Paul Woods, former chief finance officer at Newcastle City Council’s, which signed one of the first City Deals, told Room151: “In City Deals that I am familiar with, the leaders of the participating councils demonstrate strong ownership of their deals are very clearly accountable.

“Most of the round one City Deals don’t involve the up front payment of government money – in Newcastle we got the power to grow business rates and keep that local future growth to invest in infrastructure.

“It is important that there is accountability, of course, but locally, rather than nationally in the context of devolution. The local ownership of City Deals that exists ensures that this accountability is in place.”

Rob Whiteman, chief executive of the Chartered Institute for Public Finance and Accounting, said: “As decision making across a range of local public services starts to align more closely, the committee’s report rightly focuses on the need for there to be clear lines of local accountability, so that taxpayers know how and where their money is being spent – and who is responsible when things go wrong.”

Photo (cropped): Gordon Wrigley, Flickr.

 

Share

You may also like...

  • Andrew Hardingham: Holidays await but the ‘in’ box is brimming over 17th Aug, 2021
  • “Localism, localism, localism”, or simply time for better funding 19th Apr, 2021
  • ‘Funding cuts have changed the scale, shape and scope of local government’ 31st Jan, 2022
  • Mike Thatcher: constructing a new role for local government 27th Jan, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 2 days ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 3 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story New pension pool emerges
  • Next story James Bevan: Equity markets, sentiment, German data, China & fund flows

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares