• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Right to Buy figures “will not stack up”

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Resources
  • — 15 Oct, 2015

Arrangements outlined in this week’s Housing and Planning Bill for councils to pay for an extension of Right to Buy could leave authorities short of money to invest in new housing, according housing finance experts.

The government’s bill proposes a mechanism which would force authorities to pay an upfront annual levy based on the estimated value of any high value housing likely to become vacant during the year.

But research carried out on behalf of the Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) found that calculations released by the government seriously overestimate the sums generated through such sales.

CIH chief executive Terrie Alafat said: “We support the government’s ambition to give people the opportunity to achieve their aspiration of home ownership, but if affordable housing is being sold, it is absolutely crucial that it is replaced on the same terms. However, our research appears to confirm our fears that the figures simply will not stack up.”

The Conservative Party’s 2015 general election manifesto said that £4.5bn a year could be raised by forcing councils to sell the most expensive third of their homes as they become vacant.

It said that this would compensate housing associations for discounts of up to £100,000 offered to housing association tenants buying their homes, as well as providing cash for local authorities to replace lost stock.

But the CIH research found that he government’s workings were based on out of date data and over-optimistic assumptions.

It said that while the government assumed turnover would be 7% and lead to 15,000 sales annually, its research indicated the figures would be 3.5% and between 2,100 and 6,800 respectively.

This would generate between £1.2bn and £2.2bn a year – less than half of what the government hopes to raise.

The CIH also says that although it believes demand for Right to Buy will be lower than the government estimates, compensating housing associations fully for the discounts would leave virtually no money for replacing council homes.

The report said that the government’s optimistic assumptions, combined with a requirement in the legislation for councils to pay up front for estimated sales, could leave councils likely to face a big shortfall in their housing revenue accounts.

“In other words, the payments may be unrelated to actual sales, with the risk that either across the board or for individual authorities a value is set which is not achieved by the sales which actually take place,” the report said.

“While of course the details of how this might work are not yet available, if these powers were to be used to require LAs to make payments on levels of sales that are not in practice backed by actual receipts, then those payments would inevitably further constrain authorities’ ability to invest in their stock, both in maintaining the existing stock and in constructing new housing.”

It said that the move also undermines the integrity of the HRA “self-financing” agreement with councils which the government entered into with councils in April 2012.

Sarah Lines, senior associate at law firm Anthony Collins, told Room151: “I think this will cause some serious cash flow issues for councils. The government has thought of every single out and it won’t be possible for councils to get round this.

“Treasurers are already having to consider the effect of the government’s proposed rent reductions on their business plans.  This is now likely to make things worse.”

The bill does not define the “high value” thresholds above which councils would be forced to sell their stock, giving that power to the secretary of state through regulations.

However, it does allow the secretary of state to repay an amount that has been overpaid by an authority through the new arrangements via section 62 (relating to council tax payments) or section 11 (relating to capital expenditure) of the Local Government Act 2003.

Share

You may also like...

  • Council finance managers embrace cloud technology Council finance managers embrace cloud technology 8 Jan, 2014
  • £100m council property investment strategy to look outside boundaries £100m council property investment strategy to look outside boundaries 29 Jan, 2019
  • Community Asset Transfer helping reduce costs Community Asset Transfer helping reduce costs 14 Jun, 2012
  • Councils warn of uncertainty following one-year settlement decision Councils warn of uncertainty following one-year settlement decision 14 Aug, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 1 day ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 2 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 3 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Agent151: Bad behaviour
  • Next story Treasury adviser questions rivals over LOBOs

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.