• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Spending Review: Hokey cokey with the chancellor

0
  • by Guest
  • in Resources
  • — 2 Dec, 2015
Image: Gareth Milner. Flickr

Image: Gareth Milner. Flickr

Councils face a social care funding gap and the collaboration needed to tackle it will require letting go of vested positions as well as the harnessing of all resources and a spirit of generosity, writes Mark Cook.

In, out, in, out, shake it all about: The government’s programme of funding reform and devolution for local government gathered further pace with this year’s Autumn Statement and Spending Review.

For councils, it means the prospect of more resources in some respects, and also less in other ways. Fundamentally, this will require getting in tune with the government’s economic strategy for councils and the state of fiscal independence that they will have to strive to achieve by 2020.

The chancellor had his own moment of “turn around” with tax credits, but it will be interesting to see which councils will be doing their own frantic spinning and which will be plotting a clear path to a new equilibrium.

All is not healthy with Social Care, nor will it get better

Councils responsible for social care will now be able to levy a social care “precept” of up to 2% on council tax. We are told that if councils make full use of the levy, it could raise up to £2bn a year by 2019 to 2020.

The government will also increase the Better Care Fund, in pursuit of the health and social care integration agenda. However, the precept is discretionary and not all councils will be willing, or able, to implement it.

For some, the long-term reduction in revenue support grant will imperil their viability, so we do not expect this to be the final resting place for the area of services where councils most struggle to control demand.

Business rates autonomy

Uniform business rates will go, so that, by the end of the current Parliament, councils will be retaining 100% of business rates revenues.

Councils will also have the power to cut business rates and make their area more attractive to businesses.

In addition, combined authorities with elected mayors will have additional powers to raise business rates provided they fund specific infrastructure projects supported by the local business community.

This means that every council will have to have its own economic development plan, in which it will be well advised to collaborate across the tiers and with its neighbours, if the full benefits of growth are to be realised.  That willingness to work together is still not evident everywhere.

Selling off capital assets – is that really sensible?

The announcement by the chancellor that councils will be able to keep 100% of their capital receipts (excluding Right-to-Buy properties) may act as the incentive that the chancellor wants for councils to release land to provide new housing or regeneration.

However the capital receipts from such asset disposals will have to be used to fund qualifying “reform projects”. Further details from the DCLG will be released in December, which councils will need to consider first.

Councils are, however, also likely to consider that the retention of assets in order to generate revenue streams may actually be a better option for safeguarding their longer-term viability, possibly in partnership with suitable partners, both in the social housing and the private sectors.

We are currently very active in this area, and we will be advising how the government’s 100% capital receipts policy can be further enhanced in the context of such arrangements.

Devolution by evolution

With further devolution of government functions announced for the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, and the recent deals in Liverpool and the West Midlands, we see more combined authorities sweeping across England and more powers being transferred – all to be exercised by an elected mayor holding the loop between participating councils and local LEPs.

With new fundraising powers for them, we should not underestimate the power of regional government through the back door, and the possible demise of two-tier local government at a county/district level. The revolution goes on, spurred by Comrade George.

Education

The chancellor plans to phase out that great institution – the LEA, but this will have consequences for those councils that still maintain good relationships with their local schools.

How will they form constructive relationships with academies and MATs, working together in delivering local social welfare? And will there be more spin-outs of education support services?

If so, we have advised on a number of models and we know what has worked so far. It may be too late to do much with what remains in-house, so the way forward is to create new collaborative partnerships.

Knees bent arms stretched

Councils will have to do some interesting manoeuvring to respond to the latest challenges that face them.

Whilst it is good that we have a pothole fund to help keep local traffic flowing, the gap in funding for social care is what will keep many awake in the next year, including those individuals and families who need support.

The collaboration required to address this will require letting go of vested positions and a real desire to harness all resources, in a spirit of generosity in very difficult circumstances. That, for us, is at the crux of what local government has to mould for it to have a future that we all so believe in.

Mark Cook is a partner at solicitors Anthony Collins. This article first appeared on the Anthony Collins website.

Photo (cropped): Gareth Milner, Flickr.

Share

You may also like...

  • CIPFA backs alternative tool for measuring councils’ financial resilience CIPFA backs alternative tool for measuring councils’ financial resilience 9 Jul, 2019
  • ‘Firm and concerted action’ needed to improve governance 6 Oct, 2020
  • LGA slams EU procurement regulations LGA slams EU procurement regulations 16 Aug, 2012
  • Alison Griffin: Can we afford not to be more commercial? Alison Griffin: Can we afford not to be more commercial? 9 Jan, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 4 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 4 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 5 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 5 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 5 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 6 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Guy Ware: Stockholm Syndrome and the Spending Review
  • Next story Q&A: Rob Whiteman, CIPFA chief executive on the Spending Review

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.