• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Audit timetable presents “significant challenge” to authorities, says report

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Technical
  • — 11 Dec, 2014

The report talks only of this being a problem for authorities to organise themselves better, but it is a huge issue on the audit side.

— Stephen Sheen, Ichabod's Industries

Only nine local authorities managed to publish their account by 31 July in 2013/14, raising questions over the ability of councils and auditors to meet a revised timetable, set to become mandatory by 2017/18.
A report published today by the Audit Commission said the new, earlier deadline will “present a significant challenge, particularly given that only 21 principal bodies have managed to publish their audited accounts by 31 July since 2008/09.”
And it added that moving the publication date forward by two months will require a detailed review of the final accounts process and discussions with external auditors to agree suitable procedures.

Commenting on the report, Stephen Sheen, managing director at Ichabod’s Industries, said: “The report talks only of this being a problem for authorities to organise themselves better, but it is a significant issue on the audit side.
“How will the firms be able to cope with the collapsing down of the audit period and still be able to assure authorities that the work is adequately staffed with expert and experienced auditors?
“Section 151 officers should be as much interested in this as to how to shorten their own timetable most effectively.”

The report revealed that in 2013/14, 352 of 356 (99 per cent) councils received an audit opinion on their accounts by the current deadline of 30 September 2014.
In addition, only one public interest report – where serious issues are identified – was issued by auditors during the year under its “council” category – to the Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey and the Chief Constable for Surrey .
Sheen said the latter figure demonstrates “either a spectacular success for the financial management of local government, which deserves acclaim, or a less than fully effective use of statutory powers by the auditors as agents of the public interest.”
He added: “The commission’s lack of comment on the statistic worries me that the latter is nearer to the truth.”

The commission also voiced concerns that the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014, which abolishes the watchdog from next year, makes no provision for the future national collation and reporting of the results of the local audit process.
It said that the reports have helped drive up financial reporting performance across local government.
The commission’s controller of audit, Marcine Waterman, said: “The timely presentation of audited accounts with an unqualified audit opinion is fundamental to good governance.
“It indicates that bodies have sound financial management arrangements and is the main way that they account for their use of taxpayer’s money.’
Sheen agreed, but said that there was an opportunity to improve the reports further by including more commentary on how the best performing authorities secured their achievements.
He said: “The way the report is written, improvements of recent years are largely attributable to the commission name and shame policy rather than a growing enthusiasm amongst finance practitioners for better practice.
“With the LGA having more of a role in future reports through the Public Sector Audit Appointments company, thoughts should be now be given to how to make the report a constructive one for practitioners.”

Photo (cropped) by Images Money

Share

You may also like...

  • Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’ Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’ 25th Feb, 2021
  • 2022 is the year for confronting ‘chaos’ in audit and accounting 14th Dec, 2021
  • Local authorities need to ‘invest in finance teams’ 27th May, 2021
  • MPs demand “urgent” action to repair local government audit 15th Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 3 days ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 5 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 5 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 1 week ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Birmingham cites unequal cuts in response to Kerslake improvement report
  • Next story William Bourne: Getting to grips with Local Pension Boards

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares